Bush moving to the middle?
The
Boston Globe reports that President Bush’s recent
campaign swing is a return to "compassionate conservatism."
The Globe reports:
In a narrowly divided nation, Bush appears to be attempting to keep
moderate Republicans and independents in his fold, said Bill Whelan, a
research fellow at the Hoover Institution, a think tank at Stanford
University.
Bush ran as a "compassionate conservative" in 2000, but has alienated
many political moderates with his hard-line approach to social issues,
Whelan said. By talking about prescription drug benefits and extending
the principles of the No Child Left Behind Act to high schools, for
example, Bush is emphasizing domestic policy issues, where Kerry is
more trusted by voters, he said.
"It's a function of the polls," Whelan said. "These are issues where
he does have a gap with John Kerry. It ties into reaching to the
middle-of-the-road voters."
Kerry calls on Brinkley
Drudge is reporting that Sen. John Kerry is calling on his personal
biographer Doug Brinkley to get him out of the lie that he was in
Cambodia on Christmas. Brinkley is reported to be preparing an article
for the NY Times that will state that Kerry was in Cambodia in
January.
Back in 1986, Kerry offered this testimony on the floor of the Senate:
"I remember Christmas of 1968 sitting on a gunboat in Cambodia. I
remember what it was like to be shot at by the Vietnamese and Khmer
Rouge and Cambodians, and have the president of the United States
telling the American people that I was not there; the troops were not
in Cambodia. I have that memory which is seared--seared--in me."
John O’Neil’s, author of UNFIT FOR COMMAND, comments on the
‘clarification:’
"John Kerry describes Christmas Eve in Cambodia as a critical turning
point in his life. We now know that his story is completely false. My
question is how many people do you know have invented a turning point,
one that is seared in his memory? While it makes sense for John Kerry
to come clean about the Cambodia story, it is one of several tales
that the Kerry campaign will have to face and clarify."
"By claiming we were engaged in a war crime and crossing international
borders, John Kerry damaged the credibility of all the commanding
officers above him and insulted the sailors who served with him," said
John O’Neill, member of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth."
Cambodia editorial proven wrong
As the Kerry Campaign and the DNC work overtime to cover Kerry’s
Christmas in Cambodia lie, an editorial to the Washington Times has
magically appeared. The letter is written by Stephen Hayes, who served
in Vietnam as an officer in charge of a swift boat during the same
time as Kerry. Hayes claims to have taken his boat (without orders)
into Cambodia as part of the Navy’s Coastal Division 11. He then says
that Kerry was also part of Coastal Division 11. Hayes says it is
‘plausible’ that Kerry and his boat also entered Cambodia.
Problem: Hayes’ editorial is incorrect. Kerry was not in Coastal
Division 11. He was in Coastal Division 13. The area patrolled by
Coastal Division 13 extended as far north as Sa Dec, which lies about
55 miles from the Cambodian border.
An editorial sent in by Scott Swett was also published in the
Washington Times which points out Hayes’ error and thus wrong
conclusion.
Here are the two editorials:
'I also went into Cambodia'
I served as Officer-in-Charge of a Swift Boat (PCF-71) in Vietnam and
my tour overlapped with that of John Kerry. With regard to your
editorial ("Kerry's 'Christmas in Cambodia'," Tuesday), I can tell you
that my crew and I also went into Cambodia (without orders). As units
assigned to Coastal Division 11, we patrolled the Ha Tien River and an
adjacent canal that ran along the Vietnam-Cambodian border and, on
occasion, crossed into Cambodia.
Mr. Kerry was assigned to Coastal Division 11 in December 1968, and,
while I don't recall who was where on Christmas 35 years ago, it is
certainly plausible to me that Mr. Kerry and his crew could have been
across the border that night.
STEPHEN D. HAYES
U.S. Navy (1966-1969)
Alexandria
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20040811-095729-7910r.htm
Cambodia conundrums
In his recent letter, "I also went into Cambodia," Stephen Hayes
claims that he, like John Kerry, entered Cambodia as officer-in-charge
(OIC) of a swift boat during his time in Vietnam. Mr. Hayes claims
"Mr. Kerry was assigned to Coastal Division 11 in December 1968."
That is not the case. Mr. Kerry was stationed at Coastal Division 13
in Cat Lo at the time, not Coastal Division 11. The area patrolled by
Coastal Division 13 extended as far north as Sa Dec, which lies about
55 miles from the Cambodian border.
Every surviving officer in Mr. Kerry's chain of command denies that
Mr. Kerry was ever ordered to Cambodia or possibly could have gone
there on Christmas Day 1968, as he claimed before the Senate in 1986.
Also, of the five crew members on Mr. Kerry's boat at the time, three
- Bill Zaldonis, Steven Hatch and Steve Gardner - are on the record
stating that neither they nor their boat were ever in Cambodia.
The other two have declined to comment. Swift Boat Veterans for Truth
documented this further in the material they supplied to television
stations with their recent ad, "Any Questions?": "At Sa Dec, where the
Swift boat patrol area ended, there were many miles of other boats (PBR's)
leading to the Cambodian border. There also were gunboats on the
border to prevent any crossing. If Kerry tried to get through, he
would have been arrested."
Given the above, I don't think Mr. Hayes' efforts are likely to solve
John Kerry's Cambodia problem.
SCOTT SWETT
Falls Church
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20040812-090519-2590r.htm
Veterans’ ad condemnation
Media is beginning a drum beat to have President Bush condemn the
swift boat veterans’ group, who have criticized Sen. John Kerry’s self
promotion that gained him his medals of service in Vietnam.
Bush said on the CNN television talk show, Larry King Live: "Senator
Kerry is justifiably proud of his record in Vietnam and he should be."
Bush referred to Kerry's Vietnam tour as "noble service."
Bush expressed his now often repeated theme that the problem is
independent uncoordinated political actions committees under 527 of
the Internal Revenue Code (such as Iowa Presidential Watch.) He
offered this statement on Larry King Live as well:
"They've said some bad things about me. I guess they're saying bad
things about him. And what I think we ought to do is not have them on
the air," Bush said.
Kerry spokesman, former Sen. Max Cleland and the rest of the Democrats
are taking the tactic of trying to tie the swift boat veterans to Karl
Rove because their major donor is from Texas and knows Rove. Rove is a
long time key political advisor to the President.
Cleland also calls the ads dishonest and dishonorable. Those are the
words that Sen. John McCain used when he heard of the ad.
Swift boat veterans are continuing to press their account of how Kerry
does not deserve his medals and that Kerry was a danger to all who
served with him.
Cheney: not more sensitive
Vice President Dick Cheney made the case that America does not need a
more sensitive war on terror, as Sen. John Kerry promised last week.
Cheney said, "America has been in too many wars for any of our wishes,
but not a one of them was won by being sensitive." "President Lincoln
and General Grant did not wage sensitive warfare nor did President
Roosevelt, nor Generals Eisenhower and MacArthur," he said. "A
'sensitive war' will not destroy the evil men who killed 3,000
Americans and who seek the chemical, nuclear and biological weapons to
kill hundreds of thousands more.''
The Kerry campaign came back stating that in March President Bush used
the word sensitive in a speech. "We must be sensitive about expressing
our power and influence.''
Kerry offered a counter dig at Cheney, who had draft deferments, and
Bush, who was in the National Guard. After one of his standard speech
lines later in the day, "I defended our country as a young man," Kerry
added, "when others chose not to."
Another of Kerry’s foot soldiers came out with the same line in a more
challenging way, Retired Air Force Gen. Merrill McPeak contrasted
Kerry's service in Vietnam with Bush's service in the Texas National
Guard and Cheney's lack of military service. "Do the president and
vice president really want to have a debate about who is more suited
to fight the war in Iraq and the war on terror?" he said in a
statement. "Do they really want a debate about which candidate has the
toughness to make America stronger?"
Cheney is expected to take the retired general up on his challenge,
"He [Kerry] has even said that by using our strength, we are creating
terrorists and placing ourselves in greater danger," Cheney said. "But
that is a fundamental misunderstanding of the way the world we are
living in works. Terrorist attacks are not caused by the use of
strength; they are invited by the perception of weakness."
MoveOn.org’s real goal
MoveOn.org has the real goal of defeating President Bush and its
winning ad is about reducing the numerous reasons that America
invaded Iraq down to just one: finding weapons of mass destruction.
MoveOn asked real people to get before their camera and tell why they
are not voting for Bush. The winner is Lee Buttrill, who just returned
from service in Iraq.
Here is MovOn’s latest e-mail concerning their wanting to raise money
to run it during the Republican National Convention:
Dear MoveOn member,
Over the last three days, more than 100,000 MoveOn members have voted
on the seventeen finalists in our Real People ad campaign. And
we have a winner. The top rated ad features Lee Buttrill, a MoveOn
member and Marine who has recently returned from Iraq. In this ad,
Sergeant Buttrill simply and eloquently says:
"We were given these ideas that there were weapons of mass
destruction...It was just a lie. That wasn't a proper use of American
troops. It wasn't a proper use of my life, or my friends' lives, or
the marines who I've seen die around me."
With your help, we can get this ad on TV during the Republican
Convention, countering their slick spin with this simple and powerful
indictment of Bush's failures as Commander in Chief. To see Sergeant
Buttrill's ad (and the other finalists) and pitch in to get them on
the air, go to:
https://www.moveonpac.org/donate/switchad_winners.html
Starting with the Republican convention, the Bush campaign and the RNC
are going to move into high gear. They have the resources - more than
a hundred million dollars. And they have the slick ads. But we've got
the voices of ordinary people telling the simple truth. And that could
make all the difference.
Amplifying these real voices is something we can only do together. The
Republican National Convention will be funded by Bush's big-business
friends. We don't have a few people who can give a lot, but together
we're a lot of people who can give a little. And that's part of what
will make this campaign unique: never before have both the content and
the funding for an ad campaign come from the grassroots membership of
an organization.
Taxing America
The Congressional Budget Office has released a report that states,
fully one-third of President Bush's tax cuts in the last three years
have gone to people with the top 1 percent of income, who have earned
an average of $1.2 million annually, according to a report by the
nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to be published Friday.
Households with incomes in that top 1 percent were receiving an
average tax cut of $78,460 this year, while households in the middle
20 percent of earnings - averaging about $57,000 a year - were getting
an average cut of only $1,090.
Kerry has continued to argue that he will be able to fund a trillion
and half of new programs by taxing the rich. Of course, those numbers
do not ad up. However, Kerry at his economic summit offered even more
programs of government control and incentives as the solution for
America.
Bush gained attention when he responded to a questioner about
reforming the tax code with a sales tax. Kerry picked up on that point
in his economic summit.
“To add insult to injury, just yesterday the other side talked about a
national sales tax. At least that's what they call it," Kerry said. "I
call it one of the largest tax increases on the middle class in
American history. This is from an administration that has offered
almost no new ideas for our economy -- and the few they have offered
have only hurt middle-class families."