GENERAL
NEWS:
Among
the offerings in today's update:
-
From New
Hampshire: The Union Leader takes on another
wannabe – Moseley Braun. Editorial says
“she isn’t serious,” but there is a
qualified black woman who has “a legitimate
shot” at someday being prez -- Condoleeza
Rice
-
In another
Union Leader editorial, the writers side
with Jeb Bush over George W. Bush in Cuban
decision
-
In Iowa,
Kerry says opposition to gay marriages is
example of GOP hypocrisy, engages Dean in
battle of Internet petitions
-
Don’t
expect Lieberman to get union support after
drawing “boos and cat calls” at AFL-CIO
forum last night – but labor audience also
ignores reality by applauding Gephardt.
Maybe the next union benefit should be
reading lessons so they understand it’s a
Dean-Kerry race
-
The other
eight Dems might as well quit – Dean says
he has the best chance to beat GWB, believes
young voters and independents will propel
him to the Oval Office
-
Chicago
Tribune: Organized labor promising
largest voter turnout drive in its history,
television ads scheduled to begin this week
in Iowa and New Hampshire
-
Kerry
campaign manager Jordan described as “just
ugly, mean spirited” for involvement in
mid-90s South Dakota “gay smear” campaign
episode
-
Columnist
Simon: Dean delivering clear message while
Lieberman’s is as clear as mud – says
Lieberman might be right, if anybody could
figure out where he stands
-
Despite
Gephardt’s strong union showing, Chicago
Teamsters – nation’s second largest local --
broke with national to endorse Kerry. The
reason: “We think Kerry has the better
chance to win”
-
State –
Four Quad-City area judges among 18 seeking
judgeship on Iowa’s highest court
-
Speaking of
union ad campaigns, the Washington Post
reports that nurses are everywhere – or at
least in IA and NH. The TV spots begin
tomorrow
-
While
father Ted supports Mass Sen colleague
Kerry, son Patrick Kennedy will be
campaigning for Gephardt this weekend in NH
-
From
yesterday, Des Moines Register editorial
asks: “Who is this Howard Dean guy?”
-
Chicago
Tribune reports on a cultural warrior’s
battle against “the nanny culture” –
and fight against PETA and their allies
All these stories below and more.
Morning
Reports:
...
State Fair
fever hits Iowa.
The story every media outlet has this morning
– fair activities start tonight with Iowa’s
largest parade down Grand Avenue in Des
Moines from State Capitol through
downtown district. Charlie Wittmack, the first
Iowan to top Mount Everest, will be marshal
... Sioux City Journal reports that voters
“resoundingly” rejected an attempt to change
current form of city government from
manager-council structure to commission
system. The proposal to change was defeated by
a 2-1 margin – 7,874 to 3,794…In western Iowa,
Democrat Paul Shomshor was elected to
the IA House to fill vacancy created when GOP
Rep. Brad Hansen resigned to go to law
school.
CANDIDATES
& CAUCUSES:
… Possible
wannabe outbreak in IA today. Various
reports indicate as many as five wannabes
could be in Iowa today – Dean, Graham,
Kucinich, Lieberman and Sharpton: Dean
in western IA – Glenwood, Red Oak,
Corning, Creston and Winterset –
before attending “MeetUp.com” event tonight in
Des Moines. Sharpton scheduled as
the headliner tonight (7 p.m.) at a
Harkin-sponsored forum in Sioux City. But
a half-hour earlier (at 6:30 p.m.), Graham
and Kucinich are scheduled to be in
the Iowa State Fair parade …Lieberman
expected at events in Indianola and
Des Moines. Tomorrow’s lineup - Dean
heads to northern and northwest Iowa.
Graham at Iowa State Fair in Des Moines.
Lieberman hosting “Have a Cup of Joe
with Joe” event.
… Kerry engages
usual targets – Dean and Bush -- during Iowa
visit. Headline from yesterday’s Omaha
World-Herald: “Kerry, visiting Bluffs,
calls GOP hypocritical” Excerpt’s from
report – datelined Council Bluffs – by
the World-Herald’s Robynn Tysver: “A
proposed national ban on gay marriages is an
example of Republican hypocrisy in action,
said U.S. Sen. John Kerry, a Democratic
contender for president. Republicans espouse
states rights except when they have a
hot-button agenda that they want to thrust
upon the states, said Kerry, who was in
Council Bluffs for a political rally
Monday. ‘Here all of a sudden they have one
of their push-button issues . . . so we're
going to tell the states what to do,’ Kerry
said. ‘It's a very unfortunate driving of the
wedge - that is the lowest common
denominator of politics.’ The
Massachusetts senator is considered one of the
front-runners in a field of nine for the
Democratic presidential nomination. He was in
Council Bluffs to attend a get-out-the-vote
rally for Paul Shomshor, a Democratic
candidate for the Iowa House of
Representatives …. Afterward, in an impromptu
press conference, Kerry spoke about his
opposition to a Republican proposal for a
constitutional ban on gay marriages. He also
talked about his opposition to President
Bush's tax cuts, and he criticized the
president for going to war without a plan for
peace…Kerry can’t even launch an
Internet petition without engaging Dean.
Headline from yesterday’s Sioux City Journal:
“Kerry launches petition to oppose labor
rules changes” Excerpt from report –
datelined Des Moines – by Kathie
Obradovich: “U.S.
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., in Iowa to court
union votes, launched a petition on his
presidential campaign Web site Monday to
oppose proposed changes in labor rules that he
said would eliminate overtime pay for 8
million Americans.
A rival for
the Democratic presidential nomination, former
Vermont governor Howard Dean, posted a
similar petition on his Internet site Sunday,
according to Dean's Iowa campaign.
The Dean
campaign says it has put up more than a dozen
on-line petitions since April and suggests
that Kerry's new feature is ‘very similar’ to
theirs.
‘We welcome all candidates to launch their own
on-line petition efforts,’ Sarah Leonard,
spokeswoman for the Dean campaign in
Iowa, said.
Kerry, who signed his petition at an
Iowa public employee union hall, cautioned
against any claims of ownership over the
petition idea: ‘The last person who claimed
he invented the Internet didn't do so well,’
Kerry said. Former Vice President Al
Gore was often accused of making that
claim during the 2000 presidential campaign,
in which he won the Democratic nomination and
the popular vote in the general election.
Both Kerry and Dean are petitioning against
the Labor Department's proposal to change
rules classifying workers eligible for
time-and-a-half pay when they work more than
40 hours a week. Employees classified as
professional, administrative or executive who
make more than $22,100 a year, including
firefighters, police officers, nurses,
emergency medical technicians and store
supervisors, could be made exempt from
overtime pay. The Bush administration has said
the proposal is aimed at providing flexibility
for workers, who could use compensatory time
off instead of overtime pay. Kerry said
Republican George W. Bush's administration has
‘the worst jobs record since the Great
Depression.’…’It is extraordinary to me
that while chief executives in this country
are walking away with billions of dollars, the
Bush administration is prepared to beat up on
the average working person and now suggests
that they should not get overtime pay,’
Kerry said.”
… Online
voters: No go for Gore. Under the
subhead “Gore-y details,” Jennifer
Harper wrote in the “Inside Politics” column
in yesterday’s Washington Times --
“There
has been some hubbub afoot: Could Al Gore
be mulling a run for president in 2004?
Perhaps. But there are many who wish he
would give it a rest. According to an
online poll (www.vote.com) of some 6,000
respondents released yesterday, 80 percent
said Mr. Gore should not attempt
another try at the White House. ‘Al Gore
had his shot and he lost. Don't beat a dead
horse and stay out of the 2004 race,’
suggested the naysayers.”
… Who’s going to
look dumbest when the Dem nominating process
is over – the AFL-CIO delegates who applauded
Gephardt, the ones who booed Lieberman or the
delegates who won’t accept the obvious (and
polls) indicating Dean and Kerry are the
big-time Dem hitters? Headline from this
morning’s Washington Times: “Democrats
chase AFL-CIO vote” Excerpts from AP
coverage by Leigh Strobe: “Clear
divisions among the nine Democratic
presidential candidates were evident Tuesday
at an AFL-CIO forum in which Dick Gephardt
drew applause for his long-standing opposition
to trade agreements and Joe Lieberman received
boos and catcalls for endorsing school
vouchers. All nine courted the powerful
federation whose endorsement is critical for
any Democrat, offering personal stories and
union workers' accounts in their appeals. Each
used questions about trade, health care, labor
rights and education to launch a broader
critique of President Bush's record.
Lieberman, whose pitch focuses on moderate
Democrats, took some unpopular stands on trade
and vouchers with the 2,000 rank-and-file who
filled the auditorium at the Navy Pier. The
boo’s did not deter the Connecticut senator.
‘I'm going to speak the truth. I'm going to
say what I think about what's best for
America,’ said Lieberman, who earlier in the
forum had argued, ‘With all respect, ...
support of free trade and fair trade was a
basic part of the Clinton-Gore economic
record.’ Several of the Democrats railed
against any expansion of the North American
Free Trade agreement. Two indicated they would
support it. Gephardt, whose
introduction garnered the loudest applause,
reminded the audience that he led the
congressional fight against trade agreements.
‘I appreciate the position that some take
here, and I appreciate what they're saying,
but I'd just say one thing to you: Check
our record, check who was there when the fat
was in the fire,’ the Missouri congressman
said. Gephardt has gambled his fight for the
nomination on the support of organized labor
and had the most at stake in the forum. He
must overcome the doubts that some labor
leaders - specifically large service and
public sector unions - have about the
viability of a candidate who ran
unsuccessfully for the nomination in 1988. But
the former House Minority leader made clear
that this was his crowd, noting the purple and
green T-shirts in the audience and mentioning
the two unions - Service Employees
International Union and American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees - who
now stand in his way of a labor-wide
endorsement with their concerns about his
candidacy. The federation has endorsed only
twice before in primaries - Al Gore in
the last election and Walter Mondale in 1984 -
and the threshold is support from two-thirds
of the AFL-CIO's 13 million rank-and-file
members. Labor leaders say Gephardt is the
only current candidate with a chance to join
that list, even as they caution that there is
a real possibility the labor group will make
no endorsement. The AFL-CIO may call for
another meeting later this fall, giving them
more time to gauge support. But other
candidates want to deny Gephardt that
endorsement, and they used the forum to show
that they too were friends of labor.
Howard Dean, the former Vermont
governor, cited the case of Larry Allen, a
Wal-Mart worker in the audience who was fired
after he returned from a United Food and
Commercial Workers union convention. ‘If
you want to protect pensions, the way to do
that is to organize,’ Dean said. Other
candidates weren't so blatant in their effort
to court the politically powerful AFL-CIO.
Besides Lieberman, Sen. Bob Graham of Florida
also indicated his support for NAFTA. ‘The
United States does not have the choice to
become a protectionist nation,’ Graham
said. ‘We are the leader of the world economy.
Leading that economy carries with it certain
responsibilities.’ Others hedged on the touchy
subject that has decimated organized labor.
‘I want a fairness back in our economy, and I
want a trade relationship that makes sense.
Under Bill Clinton, we created 23 million new
jobs,’ said Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, a
subtle reminder that the North American Free
Trade Agreement was implemented under Clinton.
Said North Carolina Sen. John Edwards:
‘We can have free trade, but we need fair
trade also.’ Kerry, the most likely
candidate to deny Gephardt an AFL-CIO
endorsement, reminded union officials and
other Democrats why he stood the best chance
to beat Bush. ‘I cannot wait to stand up
and remind him that having a skilled Navy
pilot land you on an aircraft carrier in a
borrowed suit does not make up for losing 3
million jobs,’ said Kerry, a decorated
Vietnam War veteran. Al Sharpton
arrived late and joined his eight rivals on
stage with the forum already under way. ‘I had
a nonunion cab driver,’ he quipped.”
… The
Kennedy Split – RI Congressman Patrick to
campaign for Gephardt in New Hampshire this
weekend, although father Ted is backing Kerry.
Excerpt from report in the Boston Herald:
“Rep. Patrick Kennedy will be knocking on
doors this weekend seeking support for Rep.
Dick Gephardt's presidential campaign.
Kennedy's father, Sen. Edward Kennedy, is
backing fellow Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry.
But the Rhode Island congressman said
Gephardt has the best profile and
constituency to beat President Bush,
particularly in the Midwest. ‘That will
be the difference in whether we take back the
White House,’ Kennedy said Tuesday. ‘The
real challenge is picking up those midwestern
states that often slip back and forth in
presidential elections.’ Kennedy will be
part of a busload Rhode Island activists
canvassing for Gephardt on Saturday.
That evening, Teamsters Union President James
P. Hoffa will join Gephardt at a Manchester
rally to formally announce the union's
endorsement. That endorsement will help
Gephardt distinguish himself from the
other eight Democrats seeking the nomination,
Kennedy said. Recent polls have Gephardt
in single digits in New Hampshire, far behind
Kerry and former Vermont Gov. Howard
Dean. ‘That he's won so many endorsements
from trade unions says a lot of about Dick's
electability in primaries,’ Kennedy said.
‘Organized labor is just that: organized. In a
crowded field, that can make a huge
difference.’”
… “A woman
President? Yes, but not that woman” –
Headline from editorial in yesterday’s The
Union Leader. Editorial ranks Rice as
qualified, but says Moseley Braun “isn’t taken
seriously because she isn’t serious.”
Excerpt: “Carol Moseley Braun has as good a
chance of becoming President of the United
States as The Union Leader has of being named
the official newspaper of the Democratic
Party. But it’s not because she is black
or because she is a woman. It is because of
statements like those she made on Sunday.
‘Women tend to be oriented to practical
solutions and problem-solving,’ she said. ‘If
you want practical solutions that solve
multiple problems, turn the job over to a
woman. Women deserve a chance to lead.’ As
that quote nicely illustrates, Moseley Braun
isn’t taken seriously because she isn’t
serious. It would not take a change in
her skin color or sex for her to have a shot
at the nation’s top job. All it would
take is for her name to be, say, Condoleezza
Rice. Now there’s a woman — a black woman
at that — who has a legitimate shot at being
elected President one day. And as far as we
can tell, she’s a woman who, unlike Moseley
Braun, would stand on her merits and not argue
that her sex alone is a reason to elect her to
anything.”
… If only
People-Powered Howard had a little more
confidence – says “we’re the only ones who can
beat George Bush.” Excerpt from Associated
Press report: “Howard Dean said Tuesday he
has the best chance of beating President Bush
because he appeals to supporters of former
independent candidates John McCain, Ross Perot
and Ralph Nader as well as to Democratic Party
faithful. Dean said he believes his
candidacy will energize millions of young
people and independents who have been turned
off by standard electoral politics. ‘We've got
to bring new people into the electoral
process,’ Dean said on NBC's ‘Today’
show. ‘We're going to say that to the
people of Ralph Nader... people who voted for
John McCain and Ross Perot… and that's the
beginning of the coalition that I think can
change the occupancy of the White House.’
Dean was asked about his current high
ride in the polls and his high-profile
standing in the Democratic contest, evidenced
by cover stories in major news magazines.
‘All you can do is be who you are and say what
you think,’ Dean replied when asked if he
was vulnerable to the plight of the short-term
political phenomenon who fails when the party
caucuses and primaries arrive. ‘We have an
enormous number of supporters,’ he said. Asked
about assertions by some of his opponents that
his candidacy is doomed to failure, Dean
said, ‘Well, I'm sure those guys wish it
were a ticket to nowhere. But we're the only
ones who can beat George Bush.’ Dean repeated
his oft-stated assertion that he, in contrast
to such rivals as Dick Gephardt, Joe
Lieberman, John Kerry and Bob Graham, offers a
clear alternative to Bush. ‘We opposed the
war in Iraq from the beginning,’ he said, ‘so
it turns out that the four Washington
candidates all supported a war which turns out
to be based on things that weren't so.’
President Bush's misstatement about Iraq
seeking uranium from Africa, made in last
January's State of the Union address, hurt the
administration's credibility, he said. Dean
also took issue with contentions that he
represents too liberal a point of view to
attract mainstream voters. ‘If balancing the
budget means I'm too liberal, then call me
liberal,’ he said. He also said he thinks
Bush has squandered much of the United States'
goodwill around the world and said that needs
to be changed. ‘I supported the invasion of
Afghanistan but I think the president's job of
trying to keep peace in both places is pretty
dismal,’ he said. ‘... We're not going to
be able to leave Iraq for many, many years,
contrary to what the president has told us.’”
… “Claim:
Kerry Aide Used Gay Smear to Help Defeat
Incumbent Senator” – Headline topping
Talon News item on GOPUSA. Excerpt from
coverage by Jeff Gannon: “In 1996, Jim Jordan,
campaign manager for Democrat presidential
contender Sen. John Kerry (D-MA), was
press secretary for Tim Johnson during his
challenge to then-incumbent Sen. Larry
Pressler (R-SD). The long, negative campaign
resulted in the end of the South Dakota
Republican's 22 years in Congress. During the
campaign, Pressler was dogged by questions
about his health, since his father suffered
with Alzheimer's disease. But the most
damaging attack was delivered by James
Abourezk, the man Pressler replaced in the
Senate in 1978. Abourezk brought Alexander
Cockburn, author of ‘Washington Babylon’ to
speak to a Sioux Falls group. In his book,
Cockburn alleged that Pressler was a
homosexual. Abourezk admitted repeating
the story saying, ‘I told everybody who would
listen to me.’ Jordan allegedly sought to
take advantage of the accusations, according
to a Lisa Lutterman, a Pressler worker.
Lutterman told The Mitchell Daily Republic
that Jim Jordan was ‘just ugly, mean spirited
and boasting that he would help destroy Larry
Pressler.’ She said Jordan declared that he
was ‘going to take Larry Pressler's liver and
rip it out.’ Although Jordan said that no
such conversation ‘ever took place,’ South
Dakota newspapers followed the story as
charges and countercharges kept the scandal
alive… Pressler has always denied that he was
gay and in 1998, Cockburn retracted the
allegation and withdrew his book from
publication in a settlement with the former
senator. At the time, the ‘gay smear’
generated little attention outside South
Dakota. But in 2003, gay issues are hotly
debated. Earlier this year, Jordan's wife,
Associated Press journalist Lara Jakes Jordan
conducted an interview with Sen. Rick Santorum
(R-PA) that touched off a firestorm. Santorum
maintained that his comments about the Texas
sodomy case were taken out of context by
Jordan.”
… The confusing
world of Lieberman’s messages. Headline on
Roger Simon’s column on theunionleader.com: “Lieberman
sends mixed, and confusing, message”
Excerpt: “In a crowded field, a candidate
has to leave voters with a clear impression.
Otherwise, voters simply won’t remember
which one he is. Howard Dean, a
former governor, is a good example. If you
have to sum him up in just a couple of words
(which is the way most voters end up thinking
about candidates), he is the ‘antiwar guy.’
Sure, he is about other things and sure other
Democrats in the race oppose the war, but
Dean, by speaking out clearly and simply,
has staked out his territory. He can expand
from there — he must expand from there — but
at least people know where he stands on an
important issue. Joe Lieberman is having a
tougher time. He is probably the most
hawkish candidate in the Democratic race, and
you’d think he’d want to stake out that
territory. But Lieberman, a longtime
legislator, lives in a world of nuance, which
makes him want to qualify the things he says.
And so it is a lot tougher for him to make a
clear impression. Take Lieberman’s
position on George Bush: Sometimes he likes
George Bush. He likes the George Bush who
launched the Iraq war, and he even likes some
of the things Bush has been doing during the
occupation of Iraq. ‘The end was just, and the
means were fitting to the test,’ Lieberman
said of the Iraq war in a speech last week,
‘as was the killing of Saddam Hussein’s two
sons and the encouraging search going on now
in Iraq for Saddam Hussein himself.’ On the
other hand, there are things Lieberman doesn’t
like about Bush and the occupation. He
thinks by including those 16 words in his
State of the Union speech about Saddam Hussein
seeking uranium, Bush exaggerated the
justification for the war. On the third
hand, however, Bush was still justified in
pursuing that war. On the fourth hand, though,
Bush should have been much more prepared to
find the weapons of mass destruction, and he
should have built more international support,
according to Lieberman. ‘By its actions,
the Bush administration threatens to give a
bad name to a just war,’ Lieberman
said. If you want to put some of these hands
together in one sentence, there is this
statement, which exemplifies the difficulty
Lieberman has in putting things in clear,
unqualified terms: ‘There’s a danger that in
expressing the justified questions about the
16 words in the State of the Union, and the
stunning lack of preparedness of the Bush
administration for post-Saddam Iraq, that we
obscure the fact that this was a just war.’
Got that? Or do you have to go over it two
or three times to find out just which hand
Lieberman is using at the moment?…
Lieberman and Dean do disagree on
whether the Iraq war was a just war. ‘Every
day,’ Dean said in response to
Lieberman’s speech, ‘it becomes clearer
this was the wrong war at the wrong time.’ (A
clear, stark statement. You can accept it or
reject it. But at least you can understand
it.) Joe Lieberman is betting the
Democratic Party is not as antiwar as some
think and is confident that people can be won
over to his positions. And he may be right. If
people can just figure out what his positions
are.”
… Massage
Therapists for Dean? Under the subhead
“There's the rub,” the Washington
Times’ Jennifer Harper reported in yesterday’s
“Inside Politics” column --
“Former
Vermont Gov. Howard Dean may be garnering the
support of massage therapists in his bid for
the White House. ‘Do we have any Dean
fans here who are massage therapists? I would
love to see a 'Massage Therapists for Dean'
group who would be willing to volunteer their
services to HQ. Sounds like Kate could use one
right about now,’ wrote one visitor to Mr.
Dean's Web site (www.deanforamerica.com)
yesterday. Aforementioned Dean campaign
manager Kate O'Connor was, perhaps,
excited. ‘We're back in Vermont for the day,’
she had messaged supporters. ‘We're in the
office reintroducing ourselves to the people
we work with!! And it sure is exciting here in
the HQ!! Someone put a Coke can in the trash —
and boy, was that a mistake! The Gov.
noticed and reminded us that everything must
be recycled!’”
… “Chicago
Teamsters break for Kerry” – Headline from
yesterday’s Boston Herald. Excerpt: “Less
than a week after the powerful Teamsters union
endorsed Dick Gephardt for president, the
union's second-largest local affiliate is
bucking the party line and backing
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry. The
21,000-member Chicago Teamsters Local 705 made
its announcement yesterday, the eve of an
AFL-CIO meeting in Chicago at which the
Democratic candidates will gather for a
presidential forum. Gerald Zero, the local's
secretary-treasurer, said the choice was not
part of any political dispute with the union's
leadership and said his local sometimes
disagrees with headquarters over political
endorsements. ‘We really didn't know they
were going to endorse Gephardt or do it this
fast either,’ Zero said of the union's
decision last week to back the Missouri
congressman. ‘We had planned on endorsing
Kerry a week earlier. We think Kerry has the
better chance to win.’”
… Here come
the nurses – to Iowa and New Hampshire –
through your TV screens. SEIU already has
airport billboard – and starts broadcast
commercials tomorrow. Headline from
yesterday’s Washington Post: “In Nurses’
Ads, a Matter of Critical Care” Excerpt
from Post report by Ceci Connolly: “Everywhere
they turn, presidential candidates traipsing
across New Hampshire and Iowa are seeing
nurses -- on airport billboards, at town hall
meetings and later this week on the airwaves.
The nurses are at the center of a major push
by the Service Employees International Union
to put health care high on the 2004 campaign
agenda. Beginning Thursday, the union will buy
$245,000 in television time to run
advertisements in the two states. The
commercials will run for 11 days. In the
30-second ad, local nurses describe the dual
problem of soaring costs and rising numbers of
uninsured Americans. ‘We've got to ask
every candidate running for president what
they're going to do about health care -- and
how they're going to pay for it,’ one nurse
declares. ‘And we can't quit till we get some
real answers.’ SEIU, the nation's largest
health care union, is running the ads as part
of its ‘Americans for Health Care’ project.
Over the past year, health insurance rates in
New Hampshire have risen from the 12th-most
expensive to the second-most expensive in the
nation. Health costs in Iowa have increased
an average of 36 percent over the last three
years, according to SEIU. The union has
not endorsed any specific health care
proposals, but is instead keeping the pressure
on politicians to devise solutions. ‘Health
care better be your top priority,’ warn the
larger-than-life nurses appearing on
billboards at airports in Manchester, N.H.;
Cedar Rapids, Iowa; and Des Moines.”
… “Dean
under the microscope…The former Vermont
governor will face tougher scrutiny now that
he’s the front-runner.” – Headline on
editorial in yesterday’s Des Moines Register.
Excerpt: “Who is this Howard Dean guy?
It's a safe bet that a year ago hardly anyone
in Iowa could have correctly identified him.
Now he is the leading contender in next
January's Iowa Democratic caucuses. That
suddenly makes the caucus campaign a lot more
interesting. The obscure former governor of
a small state...well, that's a familiar script
for the caucuses. Dean is a former
governor of Vermont who has been campaigning
full time with the face-to-face politics that
can pay off in the caucuses. He added a new
wrinkle by using the Internet to draw amazing
support and donations. In the latest Iowa
Poll, Dean was the first choice of 23
percent of likely Democratic caucus-goers, 2
percentage points ahead of early favorite
Congressman Dick Gephardt. It's much too
early to predict a Dean win in the caucuses,
but it's interesting to speculate why he has
come to lead a field of better-known
contenders, including four sitting U.S.
senators and two members of the U.S. House.
Perhaps that in itself is a big part of the
reason - that Dean isn't a sitting
senator or representative. He's a
Washington outsider, a fresh face, at a time
many Democrats may be looking for someone who
hasn't been part of the Washington
establishment. The opposition rap against
Dean is that he is too far left, that
nominating him would be like the nomination of
George McGovern in 1972. But that doesn't
wash. Dean's record as governor seems to
have been as a moderate with emphasis on
fiscal restraint. On issues such as health
care, he is for incremental improvements, not
sweeping change. The ‘too liberal’ charge
stems from Dean's opposition to the war
in Iraq, which several of his Democratic
rivals supported. But that hardly makes him a
radical. A large percentage of Americans
opposed the war, and in its aftermath growing
numbers question its justification. As time
wears on, his position may look less like
radicalism and more like common sense.
Dean is a physician who shared a medical
practice with his wife, Judy. Now that he's
the surprise front-runner, Iowans will be
examining his biography and record more
closely. The next few months will tell how
well he holds up under scrutiny.”
go to
page 2
click here
to read past Iowa Daily Reports
|