Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT
Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

IPW Daily Report – Sat/Sun., February 21-22, 2004

* TODAY’S OFFERINGS:

Credibility

Yes, Nader is running again

Edwards’ limited campaign

Kerry continues to say War on Terrorism is Police Action

* CANDIDATES & CAUCUSES:

C r e d i b i l i t y
by Roger Wm. Hughes
Chairman, Iowa Presidential Watch 

From Democrat National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe and Senators John Edwards and John Kerry to MoveOn.org's effort to censure the President, everyone is singing out the same song in the choir book: President George Bush is not credible.

McAuliffe, appearing on “Face the Nation,” continued to say that President Bush’s credibility is shot because he can’t prove he reported for duty during his service in the National Guard -- despite witnesses, hundreds of pages of documents and an honorable discharge. Like Senator Joe McCarthy, McAuliffe failed to offer any proof of his accusations that President Bush should be criminally tried for being AWOL during time of war.

On “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” both John Kerry and John Edwards attacked President Bush’s credibility, despite the facts being on Bush’s side. Stephanopoulos brought up the issue of Bush saying the economy is improving and both Kerry and Edwards denied it. Stephanopoulos brought up the fact that Bush said that as long as he was President he would not ask for permission-slips to protect this country -- a reference to Kerry’s and Edwards’ call to make concessions to France and Germany (countries who both have publicly stated that the United States needs to be embarrassed and brought down to their size).

After viewing President Bush stating the fact that the American economy is improving, Edwards said, “What planet is he living on? He needs to get out with the real people and find out what is really going on.”

This from the person who wants to socialize the American economy and make America return to the age of Smoot-Hawley Protectionism, which created the last Great Depression.

There is no doubt that there are fundamental difficulties in the global economy, which is undergoing a disruption as great as the transformation from the Agrarian economy to the Industrial economy. This disruption of the global economy has American industry, business and workers wondering what to do to safeguard their future, but the demagoguery of Kerry and especially of Edwards is nothing but harmful.

Unfortunately, Peggy Noonan is right. The Bush campaign is doing a poor job.

In time-squeezed point/counterpoint TV interviews Republicans show they are ill equipped to deal with the Democrats’ assaults of lies and deceptions delivered through ever-changing premises and sound byte-speak. For a Republican to stop and explain that their opponent Dem has just changed not only the premise of his argument but the syllogism as well, is to lose the audience and the point.

Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie was asked to explain the Bush ad that showed Senator John Kerry was a hypocrite on special interest. Gillespie relied on logic and failed to make his point. He should have said: “John Kerry’s is an example of a liberal Senator from gay marriage Massachusetts who raped the American people of their money by doing favors for insurance companies that the GAO said should have given the money back on the biggest pork barrel project in American history, The Big Dig in Boston.”

This exemplifies the Democrats’ strategy of name-calling and providing so many targets that the opposition doesn’t even know where to begin in response -- something that was apparent in Gillespie’s responses to DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe on Meet the Press.

As long as this kind of inexcusable, incompetent, indefensible, losing campaign continues to be mounted by the Bush campaign, the President will continue to have his credibility drop in the polls and become more vulnerable to defeat by the Democrats.

This does not even include what those within the Administration are doing that undermines the President’s credibility -- like the President’s Chief Economist saying “outsourcing is good”, and the department's forecast that was put out saying that 2.6 million jobs will be created… a number that then had to be embarrassingly retracted.

Ralph Nader, in announcing on Meet the Press that he will continue to take the drastic road of trying to make this nation Socialist, went the farthest in challenging the President’s credibility. He said impeachment proceedings should go forward on the President.

The good news is it is early, the good news is Bush is the incumbent, and the good news is Bush is right. Now, the Bush Campaign only has to get their act together.

The bad news is the Bush supporters are sitting on their gluteus maximuses and not doing anything to support the President.
Email the Bush-Cheney Campaign now!
Tell them to get their act together.
They owe it to us.
 

Yes, Nader is running again

It came as no surprise today as Ralph Nader declared his candidacy for President of the United States – this time as an independent rather than on the Green Party’s ticket. Nader appeared on NBC’s Meet the Press with Tim Russert. Russert took great care to first present the case of “Nader the Spoiler” which exists in the minds of many Democrats after the 2000 Gore-Bush matchup. But Nader remain undentable in his convictions, calling such opposition to his running for president “contemptuous.”

Reactions to Nader’s decision were not all positive, according to an Associated Press story:

Democratic National Committee chairman Terry McAuliffe, who personally urged Nader not to run, called the decision "unfortunate."

"You know, he's had a whole distinguished career, fighting for working families, and I would hate to see part of his legacy being that he got us eight years of George Bush," McAuliffe said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico minced no words. "It's a total act of ego," he said.

Liberal Vermont Rep. Bernie Sanders, the only independent in the House and a longtime Nader friend, called Nader's decision "counterproductive." Even the Green Party, whose banner Nader carried four years ago, chose to focus on its own priorities.

Kerry continues to say War on Terrorism is Police Action

Democrat candidate John Kerry showed again today why America would not be safe under his presidential leadership. Appearing on ABC’s “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Kerry repeated his stance that the War on Terrorism is a police action:

Stephanopoulous: But in the South Carolina debate, you did say that the war on terror was primarily an intelligence and law enforcement.

Kerry: It is primarily, George. Primarily. Primarily means first. Secondarily means once you know who they are, and where they are, and what they're planning, you can go get them. …

Edwards’ limited campaign

Sen. John Edwards continues to run a limited campaign with a limited strategy that has little hope of being successful. The campaign, if continued on this course, will be over after the March 2nd races.

Edwards is campaigning in remote upstate NY where communities have been hard hit due to the drain of manufacturing jobs. Edwards has taken up former candidate Rep. Dick Gephardt’s challenge to NAFTA that Sen. John Kerry supported.

Gephardt used to criticize Edwards for voting to improve trade status to China -- a country whose trade policies have devastated the Carolina’s millworks. Edwards was not a Senator when NAFTA passed. So, he does not have a vote against NAFTA to challenge Kerry’s favorable vote on NAFTA.

Gephardt, in a conference calls with reporters, said that he didn’t see any difference in Edwards’ and Kerry’s position on trade. In fact, prior to his departure form the race in Iowa he attacked them equally for causing the loss of manufacturing jobs.

Both Kerry and Edwards are making strident populist pitches on tightening trade rules to appeal to displaced workers who blame companies for shipping jobs overseas. They both also want to raise taxes on the wealthy in calling for class warfare.

The Associated Press reports that Edwards has said:

"We have been winning delegates in every primary," said Edwards. "This contest is about winning the delegates necessary to win the nomination."

Edwards added that his campaign can continue even if he loses all 10 states on March 2.

Edwards’ only hope seems to be if Kerry does something to crash his campaign. However, the greater threat could be Ralph Nader’s entry into the Presidential contest.

Edwards has also begun campaigning to Blacks as someone who knew firsthand racism in the South:

"I have, as many of you have, seen the ugliest face of segregation and discrimination, young African-American kids sent upstairs in movie theaters, white-only signs on restaurants and lunch counters," he said. "We have such an enormous responsibility, I feel an enormous personal responsibility."

 

homepage

 

                                                                                                     click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

PO Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine