Iowa Presidential Watch |
Quotables / Bush Beat / JustPolitics / Clinton Comedies / Cartoons 06-29-2004 "After decades of brutal rule by a terror regime, the Iraqi people have their country back," said President Bush. “President Bush recognizes that Israel and Palestine are not the whole of the problem in the Islamic world. He recognizes, like President Reagan, there is a more fundamental issue at stake. The issue is the most fundamental of life’s necessities: Hope.” – writes Roger Hughes, Iowa Presidential Watch. "The most likely outcome right now in the fight for the House is anything from a small Democratic gain of a couple of seats to a small Republican gain of a couple of seats," said Stuart Rothenberg in the Rothenberg Political Report's latest "House Outlook for 2004." "The Iraqi people made history today and so did John Kerry with his unprecedented pessimism about today's progress in Iraq," Bush campaign spokesman Steve Schmidt said. "He [Al Gore] has not only found his voice,'' Donna Brazile - Gore's campaign manager in 2000 - said, "but he has really gone after the Bush administration in ways I don't think the Kerry campaign can go after Bush administration. They should give Al Gore a key position, a prime time speech, and let him roll." Brazile said about putting Gore on the convention slots. "The issue is not whether black voters will choose a Democrat, it's how many will turn out to vote," Lowery said the Rev. Joseph E. Lowery, former president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference in Atlanta. Bush pushes for TurkeyPresident Bush defied French President Jacques Chirac and continued to push for the inclusion of Turkey into the European Union. "America believes that as a European power, Turkey belongs in the European Union," Bush said. Bush pointed to the religious cultural exclusion, "Including Turkey in the EU would prove that Europe is not the exclusive club of a single religion, and it would expose the 'clash of civilizations' as a passing myth of history." In December, EU leaders will decide if Turkey has met the political criteria to be put on the formal road to EU membership. Countries such as Germany, Italy and Britain strongly back Ankara's bid, but Chirac's government has expressed wariness about kicking off a formal process to admit the relatively poor country of 70 million people. France's goal of weakening U.S.Reuters reported on France’s continued goal of weakening the U.S.’s influence in the world at the NATO conference in Istanbul: Chirac criticized Bush in Istanbul for backing Turkey's bid to join the European, saying it was none of his business. He also challenged U.S. policy on the Middle East conflict, arguing that the isolation of Yasser Arafat would hinder the peace process and announcing that his foreign minister would visit the Palestinian leader this week. "France is always trying to undermine NATO," complained one diplomat, noting that whenever communiques are being drawn up it is France that insists on inserting the words "where appropriate" in paragraphs on alliance operations. President Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO's integrated military structure in 1966, forcing the alliance to move its headquarters from Paris to Brussels. More recently, France's drive to promote an EU security policy has been seen in Washington as an effort to subvert NATO and curb U.S. influence. France profited from business with Saddam Hussein and French companies. Brzezinski’s Orwellby Roger Wm. HughesZbigniew Brzezinski continues on PBS as one of the Democrat appeasement policy wonks. Brzezenski, the creator of one of America’s greatest disasters, has taken the more than the appeasement road. Brzezenski has chosen to redefine the terrain of diplomatic discussion. He has chosen to call the neo-conservative foreign policy advisors: Orwellian. He calls them Orwellian because they dare to offer a different vision for the Middle East. Brzezinski has a lot of gall deriding the neo-conservative given the fact that he was a part of one of the worst foreign policy administrations in the history of the U.S., under President Jimmy Carter. It was only by the grace of God that Ronald Reagan was elected for eight years after the ruinous four Carter years. On the National Security Council’s official web site the following is offered: The Iranian revolution provided the coup de grace to the disintegrating Vance(Brzezinski relationship. As the upheaval developed, the two advanced fundamentally different positions. Brzezinski wanted to control the revolution and increasingly suggested military action to prevent Khomeini from coming to power, while Vance wanted to come to terms with the new Khomeini regime. As a consequence Carter failed to develop a coherent approach to the Iranian situation. Brzezinski continued, however, to promote his views, which the President eventually accepted. Vance's resignation following the unsuccessful mission undertaken over his objections to rescue the American hostages in March 1980 was the final result of the deep disagreement between Brzezinki and Vance. Brzesinski is like those individuals who challenged President Reagan’s assumptions that Communist Socialism was a policy that was doomed to failure because it failed to recognize the importance of individual action. Individual action, Reagan recognized, was at the heart of a dynamic economy. Likewise, Brzezenski is one of those foreign policy individuals who believes that Israeli- Palestinian relationship is at the heart of solving the whole of the Middle East’s problems. Brzezenski sees an Arabic nationalist uprising in the making because America has failed to put back together Clinton’s bridge too far. One of the greatest other disasters that has occurred in American foreign policy is President Clinton’s erroneous efforts to bring peace to the Middle East. He erroneously believed that Yasser Arafat was an honorable negotiating partner. Clinton’s error plunged East-West relations into the abyss. President Bush recognizes that Israel and Palestine are not the whole of the problem in the Islamic world. He recognizes, like President Reagan, there is a more fundamental issue at stake. The issue is the most fundamental of life’s necessities: Hope. President Bush is seeking to untie the Gordian knot by solving the underlying problem of Islamic extremism by bringing hope to that region of the world. Like Reagan, Bush believes in the fundamentals. He believes that unless you end the culture of oppression -- that is Islamic extremism -- the war of terrorism will not end. Unless the natural liberty of every woman and man is freed in Islam there will always be new recruits for terror. The solution to the Israeli-Palestine conflict is beyond that geography. If we deny the murderous Arafat allies, the solution to Israel and Palestine will become easier. Wean Arafat of what enables him to create chaos and terror, and the solution will come more quickly. It is not as if Arafat is a darling of his Arabian neighbors. Arafat has fired shots at Jordan and other Middle East countries. Until Arafat is gone it is unlikely that there will be peace in Israel. Bush, like Reagan, is waiting for his Mikhail Gorbachev. Brzezenski, like the 26 other diplomats who have opposed Bush, would have us forego winning in the Middle East. They did not see the fundamentals when Reagan saw and named the "Evil Empire." Now, they cannot imagine hope in the Middle East. Poll watchingThe CBS News-New York Times poll shows that there is a correlation between the economy and which candidate people support for President. Three-fourths of those who say the economy is improving support Bush, and three-fourths of those who say it's getting worse support Kerry. The poll found a slight increase in the number of people who said the economy is getting better — from 25 percent to 30 percent — and a significant decline in the number who said it's getting worse — from 30 percent to 21 percent. Kerry received 45 percent support and Bush 44 percent in the poll. In a three-way match-up, Kerry and Bush were still running even while independent Ralph Nader was at 5 percent. Florida Bush and Kerry had the backing of 43 percent apiece in a three-way match-up with independent Ralph Nader, who had the support of 5 percent in the telephone poll conducted by the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute of Connecticut.
|