Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

General News

Candidates & Caucuses

Clinton Comedies

Iowa/National Politics

Morning Summary

War & Terrorism

Federal Issues

Iowa Issues

Opinions 

Iowa Sports

Iowa Weather 

Iowaisms

Wednesday, July 23, 2003


Quotable I: “Kerry's defense allows him to retain his now seemingly antiwar campaign message while defending his middle-of-the-road and politically safe actions earlier this year. Other Democrats, including Rep. Dick Gephardt, D- Mo., have similarly talked out of both sides of their mouth to fault the Bush administration while defending their own actions.” – Excerpt from today’s “must read” item – an editorial from the Daily Iowan (University of Iowa)

Quotable II:  ”If Senator Kerry regrets his vote to remove Saddam Hussein, he should just say so. If Senator Kerry would change his vote to remove Saddam Hussein, he should just say so. If Senator Kerry is embarrassed by his vote because it's unpopular with the antiwar base of his party, he should just say so,” – Christine Iverson, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, responding to Kerry’s latest charge that the president “circumvented” the procedure outlined in the Iraq congressional resolution.  


GENERAL NEWS:

Among the offerings in today’s update:

  • Daily Iowan editorial blisters Kerry – “Either Kerry needs to clarify his campaign message, or he owes his constituents an apology for voting before thinking.” Says his defense would be “laughable” on less serious issues

  • CA Poll: Three – Dean, Kerry, Lieberman – bunched together at the top, Gephardt struggles, Edwards “hasn’t broken through at all,” and Bush has started to “sag”

  • Gephardt’s woes continue – Chicago Trib report says his candidacy is “chugging this summer” and he “hasn’t delivered the returns expected” after 27 years in DC

  • Boston Herald report: Pundits expect noise created by Dem attacks on GWB’s war policies to fizzle over the long haul

  • Kucinich drills on Cheney, calls for withdrawal of U. S. troops from Iraq

  • Kerry – probably unaware of Daily Iowan editorial or unable to read – hits Bush again, charges that the president “circumvented” the process laid out in congressional Iraq resolution

  • In New Hampshire, Lieberman launches petition drive to push Bush on child tax credit

  • GOP Goal: Dominance. LA Times reports that the 2004 campaign goal “extends far beyond the election. They want to establish political dominion for years to come.”

  • OpinionJournal.com (Wall Street Journal) says IA GOP Rep./House Budget Chair Nussle, despite being “quickly shouted down” and Dem opposition, has “already uncovered plenty of waste”

  • Gephardt, taking a page from other wannabes’ playbooks, calls for involvement of other nations in Iraq, says “we can’t win the peace alone.”

  • In Iowa, energy assistance officials report needy “already swimming in unpaid bills” face a tough winter ahead. Utilities, still owed $3 million from last winter, sent out 13,189 disconnect warnings last month

  • DC newspaper The Hill reports that Graham failing in fundraising derby in “early states.” Florida wannabe raised only $1,750 in IA, NH and SC

  • Iowaism: Amish summer produce auction, in initial season, first of its kind in the state

  • Sports: Iowa State’s alcohol-related woes continue. Cris Love – ISU’s QB of the future – won’t play in football season opener vs. Northern Iowa due to drunk driving arrest

All these stories below and more.


 

.

New Cartoons:

Pay attention

Lieberman Dumb2x

John Kerry...
Artificial Intelligence

Morning report:

… National reports say GWB is getting support from an “unlikely source” – Bill Clinton – on the Iraq intelligence situation. Clinton said on CNN’s “Larry King Live” last night that the president’s erroneous reference to the Iraq-Africa uranium link was understandable, partly because Saddam’s regime had not accounted for some weapons when Clinton left office in 2001

… Morning newscasts say 2,000 to 3,000 still without electrical power in the Cedar Rapids area as result of severe storms, tornadoes that caused more than $1 million in damage. Report says crews are now “literally going yard-to-yard” to reconnect electricity

… Des Moines Register reports this morning that the DSM mayor’s race could set a spending record. With 2.5 months until 10/7 primary, Christine Hensley has raised $96,206 and Mark McCormick has $44,775 (before officially announcing his candidacy) – with both planning to spend $200,000 each. At least four more candidates are expected to seek the mayoral post.  

CANDIDATES & CAUCUSES

… “Dean leads Democrats in California Field Poll…President’s numbers ‘have begun to sag’” – Headline from yesterday’s San Francisco Chronicle. The top numbers: Dean 16%, Kerry 15%, Lieberman 14%, Gephardt 7%, Edwards 4%. Excerpts from coverage by the Chronicle’s Carla Marinucci: “Presidential candidate Howard Dean -- buoyed by Internet campaigning and strong word-of-mouth among grassroots voters -- has rocketed to the top of the Democratic pack in crucial California, a new Field Poll released Monday showed…North Carolina Sen. John Edwards posted the lowest showing of any of the major candidates, with just 4 percent of the party's support. Among Democrats considered to be second-tier candidates, Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich is tied with Florida Sen. Bob Graham and the Rev. Al Sharpton with 3 percent, and former U.S. Sen. Carol Mosley Braun posted 2 percent. But the latest poll numbers for President Bush suggested he too may have work ahead in the nation's most populous state. Just 46 percent of the voters of California were inclined to re-elect the president, the poll showed -- numbers that appear to mirror those of his father in the months leading up to the 1992 election. ‘After six months of campaigning, the Democratic race is more unsettled than it has ever been,’ said Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo. But the numbers are ‘not a good news poll for those who are not in the top tier,’ particularly Edwards, who ‘hasn't broken through at all,’ said DiCamillo. Dean's rise to the top of the Democratic pack here is due to his position as ‘the anti-Bush candidate…at least in the top tier,’ said DiCamillo. ‘Dean has caught on in a way that is more appealing to people…but the big tipoff is where his support is coming -- the liberal wing, what he calls the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party. He has pretty much staked out the left side of the party…and it's not a bad play to start out from.’ Lieberman's decline -- from 22 percent in April to 14 percent in July -- is due to ‘the function of higher name recognition he brought to the race,’ said DiCamillo. ‘Voters were familiar and fairly comfortable with him early on. But as the other candidates get better known, it becomes a more competitive arena.’ On the GOP side, Bush's approval ratings ‘have begun to sag,’ and his re-election figures are stagnating, said DiCamillo. He said the current numbers show that voters' preferences are ‘much more wide open’ than just three months ago. Then, ‘Bush looked so strong, and looked like he would carry California,’ he said. Now ‘it's a more wide open field on the Democratic side, and the president looks to be more vulnerable here.’  The Field Poll was conducted July 1-13 statewide by telephone, of 1, 040 California registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

Chicago Tribune says Gephardt “often stung by his close connection to the party establishment” and past voting record, but he argues the New England wannabes – Kerry and Dean – won’t appeal to voters in industrial battleground states. Headline from yesterday’s Trib: “Gephardt fights to keep pace…27 years’ experience failing to deliver expected results.” Excerpts from New Hampshire coverage by Tribune national correspondent Jeff Zeleny: “Here in the White Mountains, green road signs refer to Route 2 as the Presidential Highway, an apt name for a lonely stretch of pavement where ambitious politicians travel every four years to secure support in the home of the nation's first presidential primary. A passenger on a recent day was Dick Gephardt, a man who has been on this journey longer than any of the nine Democrats in the 2004 presidential race. His white, six-wheeled mobile home, is chugging to climb the winding two-lane road. The candidacy of Gephardt, a Missouri congressman, is chugging this summer, too. The fundraising prowess he built during his 27 years in Washington hasn't delivered the returns he expected. His support for the Iraq war offended many Democratic loyalists and remains a threat to his appeal. And fresher-faced rivals are aggressively trying to pick away at his support from labor unions, the lifeblood of his constituency…In the last three months, Gephardt raised $3.87 million, falling $1 million shy of his goal and reaching only half the amount collected by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, an insurgent Democrat. The disappointment prompted aides to devise a new fundraising plan and reassess some points of Gephardt's campaign before the race picks up intensity after Labor Day. On a trip across New Hampshire this weekend, where he campaigned in front yards and back yards, flipped blueberry pancakes at a diner and threw out an opening pitch at a minor league baseball game, Gephardt exuded an unwavering perseverance. His patience, he says, comes from his previous turn as a presidential candidate and nearly three decades of Washington experience that he's not shying away from. But just as Dean capitalizes on anti-war sentiment and taps into the frustration among Democrats, Gephardt is often stung by his close connection to the party establishment and the votes he has cast. His support for the war resolution, the president's ‘Leave No Child Behind’ school reform act and the Patriot Act, haunts him as he speaks to liberal Democratic activists who have a loud voice in the primary…Because of his previous tenure as the Democratic leader in the House, Gephardt said, he is more prepared to credibly challenge Bush in an election where national security is a chief concern. ‘In the world we are in, people want experience more than freshness,’ Gephardt said in an interview. ‘You can't have long experience and be the fresh face. It doesn't work that way.’ In addition to his seasoning on foreign and domestic policy, Gephardt argues that he also holds a geographic advantage over the other Democrats. Without mentioning rivals by name, he suggests candidates from the Northeast (Dean, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut) will not easily appeal to voters in the battleground states in the industrial core of the country. ‘The battleground is in the Midwest. That's where we have to beat Bush,’ Gephardt said, delivering a pitch seldom heard in a New England state. ‘They [the Republicans] know if they can win those states, it will make it impossible for us to win.’

… “Kerry’s defense would be outright laughable if offered for, say, a budgetary issue.” – sentence from Daily Iowa (University of Iowa) editorial. Headline from the DI editorial: “Kerry, Dems passing the buck like Bush” Editorial excerpts: “It seems everyone is eager to cut bait from the exaggerated and manufactured evidence concerning Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. As more evidence surfaced destroying the veracity of the Bush administration's fear-inspiring intelligence on the Iraqi threat, President Bush and his staff began passing the blame to the British intelligence and CIA Director George Tenet. And during last weekend's Eastern Iowa campaign stop, Democratic candidate John Kerry told members of the DI editorial board that he stood ‘100 percent’ by his vote in support of military action in Iraq earlier this year but qualified it with his own passed blame by saying his vote was ‘based on the information I had at the time.’ Kerry's defense allows him to retain his now seemingly antiwar campaign message while defending his middle-of-the-road and politically safe actions earlier this year. Other Democrats, including Rep. Dick Gephardt, D- Mo., have similarly talked out of both sides of their mouth to fault the Bush administration while defending their own actions. The Bush administration's haphazard acceptance of questionable information is understandable, because the faulty information forwarded its agenda. Even if all members of the upper echelon in the Bush administration knew the intelligence information regarding Iraq's attempts to purchase uranium was questionable at best, they had reason to stand behind it and hope real evidence surfaced before the faulty was revealed. While that kind of manipulation and deception is inexcusable, it is understandable. If the motivation behind Kerry's vote lies squarely on the same bad information for which Bush is bucking all responsibility, he has actually done a greater disservice than those who deliberately deceive. Kerry is a four-term senator and a member of the opposition party that lacked cohesion and credibility leading up to the war. He owed it to his colleagues and constituents to examine the credibility of the information before giving the go-ahead for military force. By passing off responsibility for that to ‘the information I had at the time,’ he fails in his duty to his party and his constituents. In electing our leaders, we put a great deal of responsibility as well as faith in the people sent to public office. Kerry and his staff should have done more research and proceeded more thoughtfully before casting such a crucial vote. Kerry's defense would be outright laughable if offered for, say, a budgetary issue. It is difficult to imagine him saying, ‘I voted for tax relief for the wealthy because the president said it was a good idea, and I trusted him. He misled me and the American people.’ It seems to be a contagious political plague lately for our leaders to want their cake and eat it, too. Kerry abandoned his party during a crucial turning point and later jumped on the anti-Bush and antiwar bandwagon. Either Kerry needs to clarify his campaign message, or he owes his constituents an apology for voting before thinking.

Wasn’t it just a couple days ago that Smokin’ Joe Lieberman promised a tougher, more aggressive campaign? He’s sure terrorizing a lot of folks – especially other wannabes – with his latest campaign gimmick: a mean petition drive that generated over 100 signers on the first day. Report from yesterday’s The Union Leader on Lieberman’s New Hampshire stop. Excerpts from Concord coverage by AP’s Holly Ramer: “Democratic Presidential hopeful Joe Lieberman launched a petition drive yesterday urging President Bush to break the gridlock over extending the child tax credit to more low-income families. More than 25 million middle-income families are expected to begin receiving $12 billion in rebate checks later this week, thanks to the tax cut Bush signed in May, which increased the child tax credit from $600 to $1,000 per child. But Congress has yet to agree on how to make the credit more generous for the roughly 6.5 million families who do not pay enough income tax to take advantage of the bigger credits. ‘Twelve million kids whose working families need those checks most are not going to get them because of a failure of leadership by the President and just bad, upside-down priorities by the Republican leadership in Congress,’ Lieberman said in a phone interview. The House and Senate have passed bills allowing minimum-wage families to take advantage of the credit, but lawmakers have been unable to reach a compromise. With the first batch of checks to be mailed Friday — the same day House members start their summer recess — time is running out. Bush has urged House leaders to support the Senate version, which would expand the credit for families making less than $26,000… House Republicans argue that the Senate bill discriminates against the wealthy. But Democrats argue that Republicans pushed legislation designed to fail.  ‘It was a gesture so transparently insincere that no one thinks anything is going to come of it,’ Lieberman, a Connecticut senator, said of the House bill. ‘It will take the President stepping in.’ Julie Teer, spokeswoman for the New Hampshire Republican Party, said Bush already has called for Congress to send him the bill as soon as possible. ‘As a result of the President’s leadership, over 120,000 parents in New Hampshire alone will receive much needed tax relief from the increased child tax credit included in the President’s jobs and growth package —something Joe Lieberman didn’t believe was necessary,’ she said. Lieberman said he plans to continue the petition drive this week, possibly longer, and then send the results to the White House. In addition to collecting names through e-mails to supporters and a form on his Web site, www.joe2004.com, Lieberman also has organized petition drives in New Hampshire, Iowa, Arizona, South Carolina, Oklahoma and New Mexico. Lieberman did not have an estimate of how many signatures he gathered yesterday, but in their first two hours of canvassing, campaign interns in Concord collected more than 100 names.”

He’s never going to be president, but Dennis Kucinich has to be recognized for a) determination, 2) political insanity, or 3) wasting his contributors’ money. Kucinich demanded Cheney explain his “role” in Iraq intelligence issue – and called on GWB to immediately withdraw American troops. Headline from this morning’s The Union Leader: “Kucinich wants Cheney to explain his role in flap Excerpts from report by AP’s Milia Rulon: “Democratic presidential aspirant Dennis Kucinich is calling on Vice President Dick Cheney to explain his role in how the now-disavowed claim that Iraq was seeking uranium in Africa ended up in President Bush's State of the Union address. In a letter sent to the vice president, the Ohio congressman and two members of the House Government Reform subcommittee on national security, emerging threats and international relations asked Cheney to explain his multiple visits to CIA headquarters. ‘These visits were unprecedented. Normally, vice presidents, yourself included, receive regular briefings from CIA in your office ... there is no reason for the vice president to make personal visits to CIA analysts," said the letter, which was sent late Monday. Kucinich and Reps. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., posed 10 questions that they want the vice president to answer, such as: ‘Did you or a member of your staff at any time direct or encourage CIA analysts to disseminate unreliable intelligence?’…’This administration, whose entry strategy was based on falsehood, with no exit strategy, has trapped our troops in Iraq and exposed them to greater harm,’ Kucinich said in a speech on the House floor.”

…Capital Hill newspaper The Hill undercuts Graham’s Don Quixote fantasy – notes that he has “stumbled badly” in early-state fundraising battle, says he has raised only $1,750 which puts him eighth (behind Moseley Braun) in the dollar derby. Headline from The Hill: “Graham flops in key states…Money race shows Dean bests Kerry in early primaries” Excerpt from coverage by The Hill’s Sam Dealey: “In key presidential primary states, Democratic contender Sen. Bob Graham (Fla.) has stumbled badly in the fundraising political derby while Howard Dean’s insurgent candidacy outpaced that of Sen. John Kerry (Mass.), an establishment favorite. The figures for Dean, a former Vermont governor, and the others reflect campaign finance filings for the three-month period ended June 30. Fundraising is an important indicator of a candidate’s strength, and the Democratic aspirants continued to rake in the big cash from donors in perennial cash cows such as California, Florida and New York. crucial But an equally important vital sign for a presidential campaign is the candidate’s ability to raise funds in early-voting and caucus states such as Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina A poor showing in these states — and in some instances an inability to win — could severely damage a candidate’s viability and even force him to withdraw. Sen. John Edwards (N.C.) maintained a healthy lead in early primary states, pulling in over $93,000. Dean followed with $75,000, and Sen. Joe Lieberman (Conn.) with $51,000. Kerry and Rep. Dick Gephardt (Mo.) were near even, with $41,000 and $36,000 respectively. Graham fared the worst in these states, with just $1,750. While Graham’s fundraising in Iowa and New Hampshire was never expected to be strong, his continued poor performance in South Carolina is likely to raise eyebrows. As with his first filing, the Floridian — one of just two Southerners vying for the Democratic nomination — reported raising no money in the Palmetto State last quarter. What’s more, Graham’s financial support in North Carolina also plummeted, from just $10,000 in the first quarter to $800, better only than former Sen. Carol Moseley Braun (Ill.). The Graham campaign said these anemic fundraising totals reflected a nascent campaign organization rather than lack of support in these states. ‘Primarily we’ve been focused on meeting with political leaders and trying to build a political organization in those states,’ said Jamal Simmons, the campaign’s spokesman. Campaign finance reports show Graham’s financial support comes overwhelmingly from home-state donors. Almost 75 percent, or $1.23 million, of Graham donors were Floridians.”

Apparently Kerry – despite the above Daily Iowan editorial – hasn’t spotted the error of his ways and launches another volley at the President. The Union Leader, in a headline, offers a reason why Kerry is intensifying his anti-Bush rhetoric: “Pressured by anti-war wing, Kerry escalates Bush attacks” Another headline from yesterday’s Washington Times: “Bush sidestepped process on war in Iraq, Kerry says” Excerpt from the Times coverage by Amy Fagan: “Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. John Kerry yesterday said President Bush ‘circumvented’ the process laid out in the congressional resolution authorizing action against Iraq, which Mr. Kerry supported in the Senate last year. Mr. Kerry, of Massachusetts, said the president promised to build the international coalition, work through the United Nations and go to war as a last resort. ‘It is clear now that he didn't do that sufficiently,’ Mr. Kerry told reporters in a telephone conference call yesterday. He said the Iraq war resolution supported Mr. Bush exhausting diplomatic efforts before going to war, and working through the United Nations. ‘The president circumvented that process,’ he said…Mr. Kerry defended his Senate vote in favor of the Iraq resolution, however, saying it was the right vote, ‘based on the information that we were given.’ He said he voted for it with the expectation that the United States would build an international coalition and exhaust other remedies before attacking. He said he was not voting to give Mr. Bush permission ‘to make an end run around the United Nations.’ White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said all efforts were exhausted and the administration did indeed work through the United Nations. Though the U.N. Security Council did not pass a resolution authorizing the war in Iraq, Miss Buchan pointed to the U.N. resolution passed by the Security Council in November of last year, which gave Iraq a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations. ‘After 12 years of Saddam Hussein's defiance of the world and 17 U.N. resolutions, the president determined it was imperative to act,’ she said. Miss Buchan also said there was an international coalition of countries involved in the war. Christine Iverson, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, said Mr. Kerry should be more direct on the issue. ‘If Senator Kerry regrets his vote to remove Saddam Hussein, he should just say so. If Senator Kerry would change his vote to remove Saddam Hussein, he should just say so. If Senator Kerry is embarrassed by his vote because it's unpopular with the antiwar base of his party, he should just say so,’ she said. Mr. Kerry again called for an investigation into the intelligence surrounding the decision to go to war with Iraq. But he said his primary concern at this point is ensuring that we "win the peace" there. To do this, Mr. Kerry said, the administration needs to build an international force in Iraq, which it has not done. He said there are 147,000 American troops in Iraq right now and only 13,000 troops from other countries. ‘We need to internationalize this. We need to do it now. We need to do it openly,’ he said. He said some countries would like to help, but want to do so under a U.N. mandate. ‘I know for a fact that there are countries prepared to be helpful’ if they were acting under the United Nations, he said.”

Most political outlets reporting this morning about Gephardt’s call – in San Francisco yesterday -- for increased use of international troops in Iraq, basically the same as reported in yesterday’s Des Moines Register. Headline from yesterday’s Register: “Gephardt says U. S. needs other nations to serve in Iraq” Excerpts from report by Jane Norman of the Register’s Washington Bureau: “Democratic presidential candidate Dick Gephardt on Monday called for wider use of international troops in Iraq. ‘It's increasingly clear we can win the war alone, but we can't win the peace alone,’ he said. The Missouri congressman said U.S. troops in a lengthening and costly engagement in Iraq must be aided by soldiers from other nations. Gephardt, who [was] expected to deliver a major foreign policy speech in San Francisco [Tuesday], said President Bush must engage foreign leaders rather than repeat a ‘clear pattern’ of walking away from international problems. Gephardt spoke Monday with reporters and editors from Gannett Company Inc., which owns The Des Moines Register. He continued to raise questions about events leading up to the war, including assertions on Iraq's weapons capabilities in the president's State of the Union Address that turned out to be based on information considered dubious by the State Department. Bush should assume responsibility for his remarks, Gephardt said. ‘This was not some garden-variety speech,’ he said…’Credibility is vital,’ Gephardt said. He added that a full and independent inquiry should be made into intelligence available before the war, ‘not as a witch hunt, but as a way to handle it better in the future.’ Gephardt backed last October's congressional resolution authorizing war in Iraq, and said he still believes there was an ‘impressive body of evidence’ indicating that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had access to weapons of mass destruction. Despite intense criticism from anti-war Democrats, including some in Iowa, Gephardt said he has no regrets about his vote. ‘It was what I believed was the right thing to do, and I still believe it,’ he said. However, he said he would have worked longer and harder than Bush did to obtain the United Nations' approval…As for the politics of the Democratic contest, Gephardt said he is satisfied with his progress in fund raising although he came in fifth among the candidates in the most recent quarter. He said he is encouraged by union support, not just in the leadership but in the rank-and-file. Labor interests are very influential in the race for the nomination. Gephardt traditionally has done well with unions, but he is facing competition from former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. Gephardt said he was unconcerned about a perceived lack of excitement around a candidacy. ‘I don't think anybody's ahead,’ he said of the field of nine Democrats. ‘I'm doing well in Iowa, but it's close.’ The picture, he said, won't become clear until the caucuses and primaries begin.”


THE CLINTON COMEDIES:     


IOWA/NATIONAL POLITICS: 

… “Intelligence flap may be short-run hit for Bush” – Boston Herald headline on account that says it could become a “non-story” if Saddam and WMD issues resolved.  Coverage by the Herald’s Noelle Straub: “The Democratic assault on President Bush's Iraq war policies is making a lot of noise now but may fizzle over the long run, pundits agree. ‘If all of a sudden we capture Saddam and the scientists say now we can tell you what happened to the weapons of mass destruction, and we start to see the violence tone down, it becomes a non-story,’ said Norman Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. Bush has been on the defensive as political debate rages over his disputed State of the Union claim that Iraq recently sought to buy uranium, which can be used for making nuclear weapons, from Africa. Democrats also have criticized Bush's postwar planning as almost daily U.S. troop casualties continue. Stuart Rothenberg, a veteran political analyst, said Bush has taken a short-term political hit. ‘Even though the American public in polls still support the war and still think we should be over there,’ he said, ‘this is the kind of drip, drip, drip of bad news that takes its toll on a president.’  The Democrats probably will get some traction from the dispute over accurate intelligence, he said, but ‘the question is really how much and how bad it is for the president.’ Former Clinton staffer Paul Begala said the controversy has the potential to severely damage Bush because it contradicts his ‘principal claims on the affection’ of voters: that he is an honest man and a strong leader on foreign policy and national defense. But he warned the facts may yet clear Bush and, rather than rush to condemn the president, Democrats should push for an independent investigation into the matter.”

… “GOP Seeks Lasting Majority…The party dreams of a political dominion. To do that, they’re claiming Democratic ideals, raising millions and targeting lobbyists.” – Los Angeles Times headline. Excerpts from report by Janet Hook: “Emboldened by a popular president, key fund-raising advantages and an opposition party plagued by divisions, Republicans are heading into the 2004 campaign eyeing a goal that extends far beyond the election: They want to establish political dominion for years to come. With the GOP now controlling the White House and Congress, next year's vote looms as a test of whether this Republican reign is an interlude or the start of an enduring period of political supremacy on par with Democrats' hegemony for much of the 20th century. ‘The president has said he does not want a lonely victory,’ said Christine Iverson, spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee. ‘We really have an opportunity here to make this a permanent majority.’ Toward that end, Republicans have pressed their cause with bold — some say hardball — tactics. They launched an effort to redraw state political maps to favor GOP candidates. They are laying claim to issues — such as improving education and health benefits — traditionally associated with Democrats. They are trying to turn Washington's lobbying establishment into an army of GOP loyalists. And they are building up campaign treasuries that dwarf the Democrats'.
’It is breathtaking,’ said Thomas Mann, an expert on politics at the Brookings Institution think tank. ‘It's the most hard-nosed effort I've seen to use one's current majority [to try] to enlarge and maintain that majority.’ The effort may not succeed, but the sheer exuberance of the GOP drive stands in stark contrast to the pessimism that pervades Democratic circles. ‘This is a tough year,’ said a senior official of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. ‘We had a depressing election in 2002. It would be foolish not to admit that recruiting candidates and raising money is twice as hard.’ Republicans appear in especially good position to increase their narrow congressional majorities. Contested Senate races will be fought largely on terrain favorable to the GOP. And analysts surveying House races give Democrats little chance, as of now, of winning a majority. Still, gains in Congress would be of limited solace to the GOP, should President Bush fail to win reelection. And Democrats have been heartened in recent weeks by the freshly cut chinks in Bush's armor: the economy's stubborn refusal to rebound, persistent questions about his credibility in making the case for the attack on Iraq, and the rising costs and casualties of postwar operations there. Indeed, Republicans acknowledge that their high-flying ambitions could be deflated if these problems persist.”

 MORNING SUMMARY:    

This morning’s headlines:

Des Moines Register, top front-page headline: “Saddam’s Sons Killed…Tip leads to battle at hideout; Baghdad rejoices with gunfire”…”Big psychological gains seen for U. S., but will attacks stop?” Today’s RAGBRAI headline: “Riders’ errors leave their mark…Bruises and scars remind RAGBRAI riders of mistakes that they could have avoided.” Longest leg of the ride today – 78.3 miles from Osceola to Oskaloosa, where cyclists can visit the state’s only mule cemetery at Nelson Pioneer Park.

Quad-City Times, main online heads: “Raid kills Saddam’s 2 sons” & “L. A. Times cartoon prompts a visit by the Secret Service

Featured headlines, New York Times online: “With Hussein’s Heirs Gone, Hopes Rise for End to Attacks” & “Republicans Are Adding Weight to Reversal of F. C. C. Media Rule

Nation/world stories, Omaha World-Herald: “Saddam heirs gone, hopes rise in Iraq” & “Medicare bills both exceed Bush’s spending limit” Bills that earlier cleared both houses of Congress exceeded the president’s budget limits.

Sioux City Journal, top online reports: “U. S. forces kill Saddam’s two sons” & “Administration touts record on corporate crime” Bush administration says it has helped net more than 250 white-collar crime convictions.

Daily Iowan (University of Iowa), nation/world heads: “Saddam’s sons slain” & “Official defends shuttle decision

Chicago Tribune online, featured news headlines: “Ex-POW gets ‘homecoming for all homecomings’” & “U. S. says Hussein sons killed in Iraq firefight

 Iowa Briefs/Updates:

The Sioux City Journal reported that the city council, as expected, made cuts in transit and library services and eliminated two more positions as “a result of state-imposed budget reductions.” The council also increased parking fees to generate an estimated $30,000 in revenue. The Journal reported the “only remaining budget problem to be resolved involves City Manager Paul Eckert’s proposal to eliminate the Human Rights Department.”

WAR & TERRORISM: 

… “North Korea Nuclear Talks Possible Within Weeks, says Blair” – Headline from VOANews (Voice of America). Excerpt from VOA report: “Chinese leaders have indicated that a new round of talks on North Korea's nuclear development program might take place within weeks. British Prime Minister Tony Blair relayed the information to reporters on Tuesday, following talks with Chinese leaders in Beijing. He did not say what countries might take place in those proposed talks. China has tried in recent weeks to organize negotiations between North Korea and the United States. The renewed diplomatic activity comes amid continuing indications that North Korea wants to restart the nuclear weapons program it agreed to freeze in 1994. Meanwhile, the White House has denied a published report that the United States is considering offering guarantees of non-aggression to North Korea if it abandons its nuclear ambitions. A White House statement Tuesday said that the Bush administration will not offer inducements to North Korea to end its nuclear development program.  The statement says the administration is committed to multi-lateral talks to help end the nuclear standoff. Pyongyang says it wants to hold one-on-one talks with the United States and will only give up nuclear weapons if Washington ends what North Korea calls ‘hostile’ policies.”

FEDERAL ISSUES:  

From The Wall Street Journal editorial page: Nussle’s efforts “paying off” in effort to eliminate federal waste as 9/2 deadline approaches for his comprehensive effort to trim federal costs. Headline on the “Review & Outlook” commentary on OpinionJournal.com yesterday: “Waste Not, Deficit Not…A key congressman wants the government to stop throwing money away.” Excerpts: “You might expect a congressional hearing that uncovers an Indiana doctor injecting live cow and pig cells into Medicare patients and then billing the government for ‘chemotherapy’ to make news in Washington. But somehow the Beltway media missed Jim Nussle's hearings earlier this month. Perhaps it's because the chairman of the House Budget Committee is looking for waste, fraud and abuse in government spending while the reporters were busy covering Democrats who are blaming all the federal red ink on President Bush's tax cuts. No one believes that eliminating waste will by itself bring the federal government back to fiscal solvency. Only a strong economy can do that. But any politician worried about deficits might also want to limit fraud and abuse in the system. Running deficits to pay for a war and to shore up the economy is justifiable. Pouring money down the drain while increasing the federal debt is not. That, at least, is what Mr. Nussle was thinking a few months ago when he proposed a 1% across-the-board spending cut. He was quickly shouted down. So instead, he asked other House chairmen to look into wasteful spending in the agencies and departments they oversee. He figures they'll find at least 1% and maybe more that can be cut without interfering with any government services. To the consternation of Democrats, Mr. Nussle is also looking into the two-thirds of the budget considered ‘mandatory’ spending—mostly entitlements such as Medicare. He's asked the chairmen to get back to him with their findings by September 2 so he can issue a comprehensive report that will likely include suggested policy fixes. But he's already uncovered plenty of waste. In addition to the Indiana doctor, Dara Corrigan of the inspector general's office at Health and Human Services has found billions in improper Medicare spending. Other wasteful spending uncovered by Mr. Nussle includes $401 million paid out improperly last year in student financial aid--a figure Education Department Inspector General John Higgins calls ‘conservative.’ Then there's the sloppiness at the Agriculture Department, which its inspector general told Mr. Nussle has a 10% error rate in its food stamps program. Each year about $1 billion is lost in overpayments and $340 million doesn't make it into the hands of qualified recipients. The Highway Trust Fund--paid for by your gasoline taxes--likely loses $1 billion a year to fraud…And Americans are starting to report the waste they find to the Committee's Web site: www.budget.house.gov. It's important to note that this isn't a policy debate about which programs should be funded. It's an effort to bring accountability to the money that is spent. But for their part the Democrats--such as Budget's ranking member John Spratt of South Carolina--have resisted cleaning up waste, preferring to blame Defense for the run up in spending while calculating how much smaller the deficit might be without tax cuts. Once again they've proved that deficit talk is cheap and a good soundbite is priceless.

IOWA ISSUES:

Higher fuel bills expected to make next winter harsher for state’s needy. Headline from yesterday’s Sioux City Journal: “Officials bracing for tough winter as fuel prices soar” Excerpts from report by the Journal’s Todd Dorman: “Faced with a looming fuel price jump and a possible slice in federal funding, the chief of Iowa's low-income heating assistance program is bracing for a tough winter. Jerry McKim said scores of needy families are already swimming in a sea of unpaid bills. According to a June report issued by the state's private, rate-regulated utilities, households eligible for heating help last winter still owe $3 million in past-due payments. That's a 53 percent increase over the same month in 2002. Utilities also sent out disconnect warnings to 13,189 of those households last month, a 153 percent increase. Last winter, the federally funded Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, or LIHEAP, served more than 77,000 households in Iowa.It's going to be a hard, hard winter for a lot of vulnerable Iowa families,’ said McKim, who oversees the program. Households with income below 150 percent of the federal poverty threshold -- about $27,600 for a family of four -- are eligible for assistance. Last year, households received an average of $310. And nearly two-thirds reported incomes below the poverty line, or $18,400 for a family of four. Higher fuel prices are expected to make this winter harsher for those families, regardless of what Mother Nature unleashes, McKim said. Analysts blame low natural gas and propane inventories for an expected spike in wintertime prices.”

OPINIONS: 

Today’s editorials:

Today’s editorials, Des Moines Register: Register begins editorial series – “Beyond RAGBRAI…An Iowa Opportunity” -- in conjunction with the current cross-state bike ride to encourage expansion of bike trails. Today’s headline: “Make Iowa’s trails the best in America” Editorial says the state has 1,000 miles of bike trails, but they are “disconnected and scattered in short stretches across Iowa.”

 IOWA SPORTS: 

ISU quarterback of the future – maybe a more distant future than originally thought -- arrested on OWI charges. Excerpts from coverage by WOI-TV (Des Moines) sports: “Another Iowa State athlete is in trouble with the law, and alcohol is involved again. Cris Love had a slight edge in the race to be Iowa State's starting quarterback for the season opener against Northern Iowa. Now he won't play in that game at all. Love was suspended [Tuesday] by Cyclone Coach Dan McCarney. He was arrested July 3rd just south of Storm Lake and charged with operating while intoxicated. Love was originally pulled over for speeding, but police found an open container. He was subsequently charged with Operating While Intoxicated.”

IOWA WEATHER: 

… DSM 7 a.m. 60, clear. All but three IA reporting stations in 50s at 7 a.m. – from 51 in Spencer and 52 in seven locations, including Audubon and Decorah, to 60 in Des Moines and Iowa City and 61 in Davenport. Today’s high 79, mostly sunny. Tonight’s low 57, mostly clear. Thursday’s high 85, mostly sunny. Thursday night’s low 65, mostly clear. 

IOWAISMS: 

… KCCI-TV (Des Moines) reports from southern Iowa --  “Everyday busy drivers zip through Bloomfield along Highway 63, not knowing just how different life is just around the corner. There are no TVs, no cars and no electricity. It's a life LaVern Graber loves. The Amish man is proud of his wife, his six kids and his green garden…Graber said working in the garden teaches his kids responsibility. ‘I think it draws the family together to be able to work that way,’ Graber said. And every vine of the family tree is involved from the kids, to parents, to even in-laws. LaVern's mother-in-law, Nancy Yoder, takes care of more than 700 juicy red tomato plants. ‘Planted them all by hand. Down on my hands and knees,’ Yoder said. But even a family as big as the Yoders can only eat so many tomatoes. So, they're making a business of it. They now sell their vegetables, including corn, cucumbers, lettuce and potatoes, at an auction that brings the Amish world together with the rest of Iowa. It's the auction's first season and it's the first of its kind in the state. Folks travel from miles around for a taste of some of the homegrown produce.”

                                                                                                               click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine