Cash for hostage tragedy
The
Washington Times reports on Italian newspaper reports from La
Stampa that the probable reason U.S. forces did not know of the plan
to spring the Communist reporter was because Italians had decided to
pay cash for the hostage:
"Italian intelligence decided to free Sgrena paying a sum to the
kidnappers without informing American colleagues in Iraq who, if they
had known about this, would have had to oppose it, to have impeded the
operation," sources said.
"If this was the case, it could explain why American intelligence had
not informed the American military commands about the operation and
thus the patrol did not expect the car with the Italians."
Hard-liner to U.N.
According to an Associated Press report, Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice informed Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Richard
Lugar that the administration is appointing John Bolton as the next
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations:
Undersecretary of State John R. Bolton, a controversial Bush
administration figure whose strong statements on North Korea's nuclear
program irked the leaders in Pyongyang, is President Bush's choice to
be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, a government
official said Monday.
Bolton, who has served as Washington's top arms control official,
would succeed former Sen. John Danforth, who retired in January.
Dems’ cyber venture
Two Democrat political consultants are launching
DemsTV.com on the Internet.
DemsTV.com begins Tuesday and features 20 minutes of talking-head
chatter from a rotating cast of young Democratic operatives.
"The primary focus is on politics, and, frankly, a heavy focus is on
pointing out the foibles and scandals and dirty little secrets of
Republicans that we think don't receive as much coverage in the
mainstream media as they might," said Dan Manatt, one of the
producers.
The announcement that has been their placeholder at DemsTV.com is of a
Hannity bobble-head being run over by an automobile tire.
Making Cyber history
Garrett M. Graff, editor of
FishbowlDC, made history as the first blogger to be
given a press pass to the White House. Here is his first historic
comment from the White House:
This post, it seems, marks the first blog from a White House press
briefing. We're sitting in the fourth row waiting between the 9:45
a.m. gaggle and the 12:30 p.m. briefing. Cameramen and reporters are
milling around, reading novels, newspapers, and stepping outside for a
smoke. Fox News's Carl Cameron just passed by. All-in-all, it's been a
remarkably uneventful morning -- which, we're told, is what most
mornings are like at the White House.
After a week of attempts, getting into the White House this morning
was a piece of cake. We arrived at the northwest gate today promptly
at 9:30 as instructed by the Press Office on Friday. The Secret
Service officer at the gate was a little puzzled when we explained we
didn't have any press credentials, but a scan of the driver's license
confirmed we were on the list for the day. After we passed through the
gate, he presented us with the Holy Grail: A brown and white pass
reading "Press." And we were in.
Our first impression this morning? As glamorous as the beat itself may
be, there's little glamour to be found in the briefing room. The
conditions of the briefing room, famously built over the old White
House swimming pool, um, leave something to be desired.
Full report after the jump.
Lieberman odd man out
The
NY Times reports on how Sen. Joe Lieberman, the faithful Vice
Presidential candidate that his old running mate Al Gore dumped on
when he endorsed Howard Dean without so much as a word, is taking
flack from his fellow Democrats:
"I think he has betrayed his constituency and he is leaning way too
far to the right," said Marjorie Clark, a Web designer in New Haven
and former supporter of Howard Dean's presidential bid who met
Wednesday with about 30 other former Dean supporters and discussed a
statewide "Dump Joe" effort. Others are trying to recruit a primary
opponent while passing out bumper stickers that read "Anybody But
Joe."
Their disappointment with Mr. Lieberman illustrates the difficulty of
trying to be a centrist in an increasingly polarized political
climate. Mr. Lieberman has gone from a possible Democratic heir
apparent to a presidential primary footnote in 2004 to the conspicuous
odd man out in his own Senate party caucus.
Internet gains
In 2004, seventy-five million Americans used the Internet to get
political news and information.
"It's a channel difference not a substantive difference," said Lee
Rainie, director of the Pew Internet group and author of the study.
"Newspaper executives probably now have to think of themselves less as
newspaper people and more as content people."
The Pew research showed that more people received their news about how
to vote in the last election from the Internet. Radio sank below the
Internet as the source of news and newspapers dropped precipitously.
Blogs were cited for their elite effect upon campaigns.
The study also found that those with high speed-connections were 10
percent more likely to receive their news from the Internet (38
percent to 28 percent).
Tax cuts fading
The
Washington Post reports on the fact that tax cuts are no
longer on the current Republican agenda:
"The large deficits and apparent inability of Republicans to constrain
spending has made it impossible for sensible folks to advocate" big
tax cuts, said Kevin A. Hassett of the conservative American
Enterprise Institute. "Sooner or later. government has to pay for
everything."
Three great lies about Social Security
Editorial by: Roger Wm. Hughes
There are three great lies about Social Security that are taken as
truths.
The first great lie is that those who are currently receiving Social
Security benefits are just drawing their own money out of the system.
This is not true because the Social Security System has always been a
pay-as-you-go system. The first retirees who received benefits in 1937
never paid into the system. It was those working at that time who paid
for the retirees’ benefits. So too, today’s workers are paying for
current retirees’ benefits.
Those who are currently receiving benefits must realize that their
money is long gone – used as payments to the previous generation’s
retirees.
The second great lie is that the money paid into Social Security has
been stolen from the system. All surplus money received into the
Social Security account (revenues in FICA taxation greater than the
amount of money due to current retirees) is accounted for in special
treasury bonds. They earn interest, and the U.S. government will have
to start paying off those bonds in 2018. It is estimated that in 2018
revenues from FICA taxation will not equal the expenditures to baby
boomer retirees.
This surplus – plus interest – is mostly the result of the larger
number of baby boomers paying in than their parents drawing out. It is
expected that this surplus will run out in 2042.
Currently, there are 3.3 persons paying for each retiree. In 2008, it
is expected that there will be 2 persons paying for each retiree. The
number of workers paying for each retiree continues to fall for as far
as analysts can see.
The third great lie about Social Security is that general revenue tax
cuts are creating a short fall in the ability to pay Social Security.
The only way that this could possibly be true is if an appropriation
from the general fund would be spent to bail out the Social Security
System. This is not how the Social Security System is supposed to
work.
It is also a given fact by most intelligent observers that
over-taxation of an economy robs that economy of future growth. Hence,
all government taxation should not be greater than 45 – 50 percent of
GDP.
The truth is that the Social Security System is some $10 - 11 trillion
short at the current taxation rate of approximately 12.4 percent for
Old Age Survivors Disability Insurance (Social Security’s real name). The
total FICA taxation with health insurance is approximately 15.3
percent.
The other truth that is constantly being obfuscated is that unless
there are saving accounts for the generation working for their own
retirement that the third option proposed by President Clinton is not
possible. Then, President Clinton raised the alarm of the impending
Social Security disaster by saying there were only three possible
solutions to the Social Security problem: higher Social Security
taxes; cut Social Security benefits; and the third option of getting a
higher rate of return on Social Security taxes.
The only way this third option of getting a higher rate of return on
Social Security taxes works is if the taxes collected are kept for the
generation that is currently working, not paid out to those who are
already retired. Those currently working would then have the earning
potential of compound interest in higher yielding investments until
they retired.
This third option requires a generational shift in Social Security. It
requires the current retired generation no longer steal the income of
the current working generation. This is difficult to do because the
previous retired generation stole their earnings. It is difficult to
do because the full un-funded liability to Social Security looms
somewhere in the range of $26 trillion... and is currently $10 – 11
trillion short.
Probably the only way to implement this generational shift and ease
the burden on our nation and future generations is to implement it
gradually. As all of us baby boomers know, this means cutting
benefits.
The problem with Social Security will not go away. Current retirees
seem fond of the bumper sticker “I’m spending my children’s
inheritance.” Nothing could be further from the truth. The current
generation of retirees are not spending their children’s inheritance.
They are spending their children’s current earnings.
Roger Wm. Hughes is a
political consultant and Chairman of Iowa Presidential Watch, a
conservative political website and unaffiliated PAC. [e-mail:
sixstrategies@wmtel.net]
|