Social Security Wars
Dan Balz offers a word of caution to Democrats about Social Security
in the
Washington Post. He especially features Stan Greenberg and
James Carville:
The party's situation was posed most provocatively by two veteran
Democratic strategists, Stan Greenberg and James Carville. In a memo
issued last week, the two wrote: "We ask progressives to consider, why
have the Republicans not crashed and burned?"
"Why has the public not taken out their anger on the congressional
Republicans and the president?" they added. "We think the answer lies
with voters' deeper feelings about the Democrats who appear to lack
direction, conviction, values, advocacy or a larger public purpose."
Balz also brings in Harold Ickes’ cautionary note:
Harold Ickes, White House deputy chief of staff in the Clinton
administration, said that without a plan of their own, Democrats risk
GOP inroads among younger voters and the potential of Bush engineering
a compromise this year in which he claims victory, even in the absence
of the personal accounts he has championed.
as David Winston, a GOP pollster, states the difficulties with the
Democrat strategy is that the Republicans have defined the problem and
the American public agrees there is a problem. Now, the question is:
What is the policy that will fix the problem?
This, of course, leaves Democrats on the outside looking in.
"I think Democrats should be real clear on their principles and they
should broaden the agenda" to a debate over "the cost of health care,
pensions and other issues that are essential to retirement," Stan
Greenberg said. "Make it a bigger battle for retirement."
President’s speech on Terrorism
Thank you, all. Please be seated. It is great to be back to this fine
university. Many great military leaders of the 20th century, from
Dwight Eisenhower, to Colin Powell, studied on this campus. And today
the National Defense University is training a new generation of
leaders who will serve and defend this nation in a new century.
Americans are grateful for your devotion to duty, and so is your
Commander-in-Chief. (Applause.
I am honored that two influential and important members of the United
States Congress have joined us. First, Senator Joe Lieberman, strong
defender of freedom. Thank you for coming, Senator. (Applause.) And
the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman Duncan
Hunter. Proud you're here, Dunc. Thanks for coming. (Applause.) In the
midst of what we hope will be the final snow blizzard of 2005 --
(laughter) -- I'm honored you two men slushed here to this event.
I appreciate so very much Lieutenant General Michael Dunn and his
wife, Pam, for greeting me and for serving our nation. I want to thank
all the National Defense University students for being here. I
appreciate the staff for joining us. I want to thank the members of
the diplomatic corps who have come today. It is an honor to see you
all again. I want to thank my fellow Americans for caring about the
subject of peace, and that's what I'm here to discuss.
We meet at a time of great consequence for the security of our nation,
a time when the defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom, a
time with echoes in our history.
Twice in six decades, a sudden attack on the United States launched
our country into a global conflict, and began a period of serious
reflection on America's place in the world. The bombing of Pearl
Harbor taught America that unopposed tyranny, even on far-away
continents, could draw our country into a struggle for our own
survival. And our reflection on that lesson led us to help build
peaceful democracies in the ruins of tyranny, to unite free nations in
the NATO Alliance, and to establish a firm commitment to peace in the
Pacific that continues to this day.
The attacks of September the 11th, 2001 also revealed the outlines of
a new world. In one way, that assault was the culmination of decades
of escalating violence -- from the killing of U.S. Marines in Beirut,
to the bombing at the World Trade Center, to the attacks on American
embassies in Africa, to the attacks on the USS Cole. In another way,
September the 11th provided a warning of future dangers -- of terror
networks aided by outlaw regimes, and ideologies that incite the
murder of the innocent, and biological and chemical and nuclear
weapons that multiply destructive power.
Like an earlier generation, America is answering new dangers with firm
resolve. No matter how long it takes, no matter how difficult the
task, we will fight the enemy, and lift the shadow of fear, and lead
free nations to victory. (Applause.)
Like an earlier generation, America is pursuing a clear strategy with
our allies to achieve victory. Our immediate strategy is to eliminate
terrorist threats abroad, so we do not have to face them here at home.
The theory here is straightforward: terrorists are less likely to
endanger our security if they are worried about their own security.
When terrorists spend their days struggling to avoid death or capture,
they are less capable of arming and training to commit new attacks. We
will keep the terrorists on the run, until they have nowhere left to
hide.
In three and a half years, the United States and our allies have waged
a campaign of global scale -- from the mountains of Afghanistan, to
the border regions of Pakistan, to the Horn of Africa, to the islands
of the Philippines, to the plains of North Central Iraq. The al Qaeda
terror network that attacked our country still has leaders, but many
of its top commanders have been removed. There are still governments
that sponsor and harbor terrorists, but their number has declined.
There are still regimes seeking weapons of mass destruction -- but no
longer without attention and without consequence. Our country is still
the target of terrorists who want to kill many, and intimidate us all.
We will stay on the offensive against them, until the fight is won.
(Applause.)
Members of our military are undertaking difficult missions, in some of
the most dangerous and desolate parts of the world. These volunteers
know the risks they face, and they know the cause they serve. As one
Marine sergeant put it, "I never want my children to experience what
we saw in New York, at the Pentagon, and in Pennsylvania." He said,
"If we can eliminate whatever threat we can on foreign soil, I would
rather do it there than have it come home to us." In this vital cause,
some of our men and women in uniform have fallen, some have returned
home with terrible injuries, and all who sacrifice will have the
permanent gratitude of the United States of America. (Applause.)
In this war on terror, America is not alone. Many governments have
awakened to the dangers we share and have begun to take serious
action. Global terror requires a global response, and America is more
secure today because dozens of other countries have stepped up to the
fight.
We're more secure because Pakistani forces captured more than one
hundred extremists across the country last year, including operatives
who were plotting attacks against the United States. We're more secure
because Britain arrested an al Qaeda operative who had provided
detailed casing reports on American targets to senior al Qaeda
leaders. We're more secure because German authorities arrested
extremists who were planning attacks against U.S. and coalition
targets in Iraq. We're more secure because the Philippines' new
Anti-Terrorism Task Force has helped capture more than a dozen
terrorist suspects -- including seven members of al Qaeda and
affiliated networks. We're more secure because Poland is leading a
15-nation multi-national division in Iraq, and forces from 23
countries have given their lives in the struggle against terrorists
and insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Our allies in the war on terror are making tough decisions, and
they're taking risks, and they're losing lives. These countries have
proven themselves trusted friends and reliable allies. So I urge the
Congress to pass the Solidarity Initiative I have proposed to stand by
the countries that are standing by us in the war on terror.
(Applause.)
Our strategy to keep the peace in the longer term is to help change
the conditions that give rise to extremism and terror, especially in
the broader Middle East. Parts of that region have been caught for
generations in a cycle of tyranny and despair and radicalism. When a
dictatorship controls the political life of a country, responsible
opposition cannot develop, and dissent is driven underground and
toward the extreme. And to draw attention away from their social and
economic failures, dictators place blame on other countries and other
races, and stir the hatred that leads to violence. This status quo of
despotism and anger cannot be ignored or appeased, kept in a box or
bought off, because we have witnessed how the violence in that region
can reach easily across borders and oceans. The entire world has an
urgent interest in the progress, and hope, and freedom in the broader
Middle East.
The advance of hope in the Middle East requires new thinking in the
region. By now it should be clear that authoritarian rule is not the
wave of the future; it is the last gasp of a discredited past. It
should be clear that free nations escape stagnation, and grow stronger
with time, because they encourage the creativity and enterprise of
their people. It should be clear that economic progress requires
political modernization, including honest representative government
and the rule of law. And it should be clear that no society can
advance with only half of its talent and energy -- and that demands
the full participation of women. (Applause.)
The advance of hope in the Middle East also requires new thinking in
the capitals of great democracies -- including Washington, D.C. By now
it should be clear that decades of excusing and accommodating tyranny,
in the pursuit of stability, have only led to injustice and
instability and tragedy. It should be clear that the advance of
democracy leads to peace, because governments that respect the rights
of their people also respect the rights of their neighbors. It should
be clear that the best antidote to radicalism and terror is the
tolerance and hope kindled in free societies. And our duty is now
clear: For the sake of our long-term security, all free nations must
stand with the forces of democracy and justice that have begun to
transform the Middle East.
Encouraging democracy in that region is a generational commitment.
It's also a difficult commitment, demanding patience and resolve --
when the headlines are good and when the headlines aren't so good.
Freedom has determined enemies, who show no mercy for the innocent,
and no respect for the rules of warfare. Many societies in the region
struggle with poverty and illiteracy, many rulers in the region have
longstanding habits of control; many people in the region have deeply
ingrained habits of fear.
For all these reasons, the chances of democratic progress in the
broader Middle East have seemed frozen in place for decades. Yet at
last, clearly and suddenly, the thaw has begun. The people of
Afghanistan have embraced free government, after suffering under one
of the most backward tyrannies on earth. The voters in Iraq defied
threats of murder, and have set their country on a path to full
democracy. The people of the Palestinian Territories cast their
ballots against violence and corruption of the past. And any who doubt
the appeal of freedom in the Middle East can look to Lebanon, where
the Lebanese people are demanding a free and independent nation. In
the words of one Lebanese observer, "Democracy is knocking at the door
of this country and, if it's successful in Lebanon, it is going to
ring the doors of every Arab regime."
Across the Middle East, a critical mass of events is taking that
region in a hopeful new direction. Historic changes have many causes,
yet these changes have one factor in common. A businessman in Beirut
recently said, "We have removed the mask of fear. We're not afraid
anymore." Pervasive fear is the foundation of every dictatorial regime
-- the prop that holds up all power not based on consent. And when the
regime of fear is broken, and the people find their courage and find
their voice, democracy is their goal, and tyrants, themselves, have
reason to fear. (Applause.)
History is moving quickly, and leaders in the Middle East have
important choices to make. The world community, including Russia and
Germany and France and Saudi Arabia and the United States has
presented the Syrian government with one of those choices -- to end
its nearly 30-year occupation of Lebanon, or become even more isolated
from the world. The Lebanese people have heard the speech by the
Syrian president. They've seen these delaying tactics and
half-measures before. The time has come for Syria to fully implement
Security Council Resolution 1559. All Syrian military forces and
intelligence personnel must withdraw before the Lebanese elections,
for those elections to be free and fair. (Applause.)
The elections in Lebanon must be fully and carefully monitored by
international observers. The Lebanese people have the right to
determine their future, free from domination by a foreign power. The
Lebanese people have the right to choose their own parliament this
spring, free of intimidation. And that new government will have the
help of the international community in building sound political,
economic, and military institutions, so the great nation of Lebanon
can move forward in security and freedom. (Applause.)
Today I have a message for the people of Lebanon: All the world is
witnessing your great movement of conscience. Lebanon's future belongs
in your hands, and by your courage, Lebanon's future will be in your
hands. The American people are on your side. Millions across the earth
are on your side. The momentum of freedom is on your side, and freedom
will prevail in Lebanon. (Applause.)
America and other nations are also aware that the recent terrorist
attack in Tel Aviv was conducted by a radical Palestinian group
headquartered in Damascus. Syria, as well as Iran, has a long history
of supporting terrorist groups determined to sow division and chaos in
the Middle East, and there is every possibility they will try this
strategy again. The time has come for Syria and Iran to stop using
murder as a tool of policy, and to end all support for terrorism.
(Applause.)
In spite of attacks by extremists, the world is seeing hopeful
progress in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. There is only one outcome
that will end the tyranny, danger, violence and hopelessness, and meet
the aspirations of all people in the region: We seek two democratic
states, Israel and Palestine, living side-by-side in peace and
security. (Applause.)
And that goal is within reach, if all the parties meet their
responsibilities and if terrorism is brought to an end. Arab states
must end incitement in their own media, cut off public and private
funding for terrorism, stop their support for extremist education, and
establish normal relations with Israel. Israel must freeze settlement
activity, help the Palestinians build a thriving economy, and ensure
that a new Palestinian state is truly viable, with contiguous
territory on the West Bank. Palestinian leaders must fight corruption,
encourage free enterprise, rest true authority with the people, and
actively confront terrorist groups.
The bombing in Tel Aviv is a reminder that the fight against
terrorists is critical to the search for peace and for Palestinian
statehood. In an interview last week, Palestinian President Abbas
strongly condemned the terrorist attack in Tel Aviv, declaring,
"Ending violence and security chaos is first and foremost a
Palestinian interest." He went on to say, "We cannot build the
foundations of a state without the rule of law and public order."
President Abbas is correct. And so the United States will help the
Palestinian Authority build the security services that current peace
and future statehood require: security forces which are effective,
responsive to civilian control, and dedicated to fighting terror and
upholding the rule of law. We will coordinate with the government of
Israel, with neighbors such as Egypt and Jordan, and with other donors
to ensure that Palestinians get the training and equipment they need.
The United States is determined to help the parties remove obstacles
to progress and move forward in practical ways, so we can seize this
moment for peace in the Holy Land. (Applause.)
In other parts of the Middle East, we're seeing small but welcome
steps. Saudi Arabia's recent municipal elections were the beginning of
reform that may allow greater participation in the future. Egypt has
now -- has now the prospect of competitive, multi-party elections for
President in September. Like all free elections, these require freedom
of assembly, multiple candidates, free access by those candidates to
the media, and the right to form political parties. Each country in
the Middle East will take a different path of reform. And every nation
that starts on that journey can know that America will walk at its
side. (Applause.)
Progress in the Middle East is threatened by weapons of mass
destruction and their proliferation. Today, Great Britain, France, and
Germany are involved in a difficult negotiation with Iran aimed at
stopping its nuclear weapons program. We want our allies to succeed,
because we share the view that Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons
would be destabilizing and threatening to all of Iran's neighbors. The
Iranian regime should listen to the concerns of the world, and listen
to the voice of the Iranian people, who long for their liberty and
want their country to be a respected member of the international
community. We look forward to the day when Iran joins in the hopeful
changes taking place across the region. We look forward to the day
when the Iranian people are free. (Applause.)
Iran and other nations have an example in Iraq. The recent elections
have begun a process of debate and coalition building unique in Iraqi
history, and inspiring to see. Iraq's leaders are forming a government
that will oversee the next -- and critical -- stage in Iraq's
political transition: the writing of a permanent constitution. This
process must take place without external influence. The shape of
Iraq's democracy must be determined by the Iraqis, themselves.
(Applause.)
Iraq's democracy, in the long run, must also be defended by Iraqis,
themselves. Our goal is to help Iraqi security forces move toward
self-reliance, and they are making daily progress. Iraqi forces were
the main providers of security at about 5,000 polling places in the
January elections. Our coalition is providing equipment and training
to the new Iraqi military, yet they bring a spirit all of their own.
Last month, when soldiers of the U.S. 7th Cavalry Regiment were on
combat patrol north of Baghdad, one of their Humvees fell into a
canal, and Iraqi troops came to their rescue -- plunging into the
water again and again, until the last American was recovered. The Army
colonel in charge of the unit said, "When I saw those Iraqis in the
water, fighting to save their American brothers, I saw a glimpse of
the future of this country." One of the Iraqi soldiers commented,
"These people have come a hundred -- 10,000 miles to help my country.
They've left their families and their children. If we can give them
something back, just a little, we can show our thanks." (Applause.)
America is proud to defend freedom in Iraq, and proud to stand with
the brave Iraqis as they defend their own freedom. (Applause.)
Three and a half years ago, the United States mourned our dead,
gathered our resolve, and accepted a mission. We made a decision to
stop threats to the American people before they arrive on our shores,
and we have acted on that decision. We're also determined to seek and
support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every
nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our
world. (Applause.)
This objective will not be achieved easily, or all at once, or
primarily by force of arms. We know that freedom, by definition, must
be chosen, and that the democratic institutions of other nations will
not look like our own. Yet we also know that our security increasingly
depends on the hope and progress of other nations now simmering in
despair and resentment. And that hope and progress is found only in
the advance of freedom.
This advance is a consistent theme of American strategy -- from the
Fourteen Points, to the Four Freedoms, to the Marshall Plan, to the
Reagan Doctrine. Yet the success of this approach does not depend on
grand strategy alone. We are confident that the desire for freedom,
even when repressed for generations, is present in every human heart.
(Applause.) And that desire can emerge with sudden power to change the
course of history.
Americans, of all people, should not be surprised by freedom's power.
A nation founded on the universal claim of individual rights should
not be surprised when other people claim those rights. Those who place
their hope in freedom may be attacked and challenged, but they will
not ultimately be disappointed, because freedom is the design of
humanity and freedom is the direction of history. (Applause.)
In our time, America has been attacked. America has been challenged.
Yet the uncertainty, and sorrow, and sacrifice of these years have not
been in vain. Millions have gained their liberty; and millions more
have gained the hope of liberty that will not be denied. The trumpet
of freedom has been sounded, and that trumpet never calls retreat.
(Applause.)
Before history is written in books, it is written in courage -- the
courage of honorable soldiers; the courage of oppressed peoples; the
courage of free nations in difficult tasks. Our generation is
fortunate to live in a time of courage. And we are proud to serve in
freedom's cause.
May God bless you all.
House Dems allege abuse of power
Rep. Nancy Pelosi today alleged that democracy in America is
threatened by the rules governing conduct in the House of
Representatives. The Democrats today released a report of alleged
abuses and recommendations as to remedies. The report is titled "Broken
Promises".
"Under the current House leadership, floor debate is muzzled, few
amendments are permitted, votes are often cast with fear of
retribution, and conference committees too often do not meet. Instead,
a handful of Republican leaders dictate the party line. They ram bills
through committees without full discussion, permit few if any floor
amendments, and if need be, hold open floor votes until enough arms
have been twisted to ensure passage," Pelosi said.
"This is the dismal state of our representative democracy under
Republican leadership. This is the sad example we are setting for the
world. We must never forget the power of our example. It seems the
Republicans have.
"And coupled with radical, partisan changes in the ethics rules
designed to lower the ethical standards of the House of
Representatives, this is why democracy is threatened in the people's
House." Pelosi said.
Democrat liberal merger
Today, it was announced that two key liberal organizations joined
forces. Democracy for America (DFA) and Driving Votes have partnered
permanently to help strengthen grassroots movements across the
country. All of Driving Votes innovative volunteer activation tools
can now be found at
www.DemocracyforAmerica.com.
Driving Votes volunteers will join forces with over 400 local DFA
Meetup groups to broaden Democracy for America's grassroots network in
every state.
"Through this partnership we will move one step closer to taking our
country back," said Jim Dean, Chair of Democracy for America. "By
joining together, Democracy for America and Driving Votes will build
up our grassroots network from coast to coast and help elect community
leaders who will impact the political process for years to come."
"I'm proud to announce that Driving Votes is joining forces with
Democracy for America, and fighting for progressive candidates,
policies and values as a single organization," said Leighton
Woodhouse, Executive Director of Driving Votes. "Together, Driving
Votes and DFA will make the grassroots stronger."
The Driving Votes website and political action committee are closing,
but the Driving Votes brand name and mission will continue through
Democracy for America.
MoveOn.org’s house parties
Here is the latest from MoveOn.org:
Dear MoveOn member,
Your actions this week could determine the composition of the Supreme
Court 30 years from now.
Last week, we told you that President Bush is trying to force through
20 right-wing judicial nominees. But this fight is also about
something much bigger: whether the rest of America will have any say
at all over who ends up on the Supreme Court. Republican leaders are
trying to use a parliamentary trick so extreme it's called the
"nuclear option" to end one of our most basic democratic
traditions—the requirement that lifetime judicial nominees have broad
support in Congress. The result: justices far outside the mainstream,
who will favor corporations over citizens' rights and could undo
generations of progress.
We have a plan to stop them: MoveOn members will team up in every town
in America to spread the word about the Republican leadership's
stealth attack on the judiciary and demand our senators stop it. But
we may only have a few weeks to turn the tide. Will you come to a
party on Thursday where people in your city can make a plan to save
our courts?
If you don't see a party near you, host your own. It's easy, fun, and
we'll show you how. Click here:
http://action.moveonpac.org/houseparties/newmeeting.html
There are more than 1,000 parties planned around the country right
now, with names like Beat the Bushes for Democracy (in Napa, CA),
Judge NOT (Greensboro, NC), The Constitution is not just a piece of
paper (Titusville, FL), and Mayflower Power! (Plymouth, MA). We expect
more than 10,000 people in attendance, forming the core of our new
campaign to win back America.
Because judges are just the beginning. We need to fight the
administration's agenda on many fronts, and the approach we'll lay out
at the party—teams of MoveOn members taking local actions to win
national fights—will be the foundation of our whole strategy to win.
But our first focus will be safeguarding the courts.
Bush & Cheney's plan for the courts is breathtaking: Get Vice
President Cheney, as Senate President, to quietly wipe out a
centuries-old Senate practice that requires 60 votes to confirm a
controversial judge. Do it now, before there's an opening on the
Supreme Court and the public starts to pay attention. Then stack the
Supreme Court and all federal courts with judges so extreme they could
turn the clock back 70 years on efforts to protect working people,
public health, the environment, civil rights, civil liberties, and
privacy.
They key to stopping them is to inform the public about what's
happening behind closed doors and put pressure directly on our
senators—a simple majority vote can block Bush & Cheney's plan. During
the election, we learned through our Leave No Voter Behind program
that when MoveOn members team up, we can move mountains. So instead of
just asking you to send an email or make a phone call, we're asking
you to join with other members in your neighborhood to form an "action
team" and spread the word to dozens of your friends and neighbors. And
we need you to do it before the "nuclear option" comes up for a vote,
probably in early April.
At the party, you'll hear about Bush's attack on the judiciary from a
surprise guest speaker, and then we'll help you plan a local call-in
day to your senators: Republicans need to know that they can't sneak
this partisan rule change through without a fight, and Democrats need
to hear how important this is to us so when Cheney goes on talk shows
and calls Democrats "obstructionists," they won't give in. No matter
how liberal or conservative your senators, they all matter.
This is one fight we simply can't afford to lose. Will you join us at
a party to get your city organized against the Republican leadership's
extreme agenda? Past house party participants always tell us it's a
lot of fun and a great way to meet some neighbors. Please come:
http://action.moveonpac.org/houseparties/
Of course, this is only one of many areas in which Republican leaders
in Congress and the White House are trying to use deception and scare
tactics to force through a sweeping right-wing agenda. So beyond
judges, we'll ask your team to spread the word about other critical
issues like Social Security privatization and the war in Iraq. And at
the party, we'll lay out our plan to use our neighborhood organizing
to build a foundation for electing progressives to Congress.
It's a bold agenda to turn the tide and begin building a more
progressive America, town by town and block by block. And it begins
with you. We hope to see you on Thursday.
Sincerely,
--Adam, Justin, Matt, and the MoveOn PAC team
Graham in DNC’s sights
The Democrat National Committee is gunning for Sen. Lindsey Graham.
Graham made comments at a Lincoln Day Dinner that have the DNC
believing that they can hurt Graham.
"We don’t do Lincoln Day Dinners in South Carolina," Senator Graham
told a Lincoln Day gathering in Tennessee Saturday. "It’s nothing
personal, but it takes awhile to get over things."
The Democratic National Committee said Sen. Graham’s remarks were
inappropriate and that they echoed comments made by former Senate
Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-MS), which resulted in Lott’s removal as
Senate leader.
Hispanic Democrat revolt
The
Hill reports the fact that Hispanic Caucus is not happy with
current state affairs:
Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus are withholding their
party membership dues until they receive assurances from House
Democratic leaders that the party will make a concerted effort to
engage Hispanic voters and better serve the needs of the Hispanic
community.
Lawmakers withholding their dues said that their decision was the
culmination of several years of frustration with what they view as the
Democratic Party’s failure to reach out to Hispanics and include them
in the decision-making process. They are also increasingly concerned
by results at the ballot box and of post-election surveys showing that
President Bush won 44 percent of the Hispanic vote.
Caucus members last week demanded meetings with House Minority Leader
Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee (DCCC) Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D-Ill.) and told The Hill that
they would use their pending party dues as leverage to secure an
audience.
Pelosi is scheduled to receive the caucus in her office tomorrow, and
Emanuel will host members one week later at DCCC headquarters.
Party leaders are levying dues — which range from $100,000 to $600,000
— on a quarterly basis this cycle, and the Hispanics’ threat that they
might not comply by March 31 is the first instance of lawmakers
chafing under the new deadline.
Social Security Iceberg coming
The Progress for America Voter Fund, a Republican political advocacy
group, began a $2 million campaign of television commercials on
Monday, rolling out a minute-long advertisement supporting President
Bush's Social Security plan. The ad features an iceberg. Got to the
Progress for America Voter Fund to see the ad.
Hillary to North Korea, II
There continues to be rumors of a Hillary Clinton visit to North
Korea. However, on Monday the U.S. Embassy in Seoul dismissed reports
that Senator Clinton is planning a trip to the Democratic People's
Republic of Korea (DPRK).
Han Hwa-kap, who heads the Asian part of the Asia-U.S. Network (a
forum of lawmakers from both continents) has reportedly sent
invitations earlier this year to five U.S. senators to visit the DPRK.
Han also told local media that Hillary wished to meet DPRK leader Kim
Jong-il personally to discuss the ongoing nuclear standoff.