Pelosi hypocrite
The
Washington Times covers Republicans’ accusation that Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi is a hypocrite for not calling for investigations
into Democrats who have done the same things that caused her to call
for investigations of Majority Leader Tom DeLay:
"She demanded an investigation into [Majority Leader] Tom DeLay, but
hasn't said a word about these Democrats who have done the same
thing," said Rep. Patrick T. McHenry, North Carolina Republican. "If
she doesn't call for investigations into her fellow Democrats, then
it's clear she's being a hypocrite."
Republicans are wondering why the California representative won't ask
for investigations into Democratic Reps. Norm Dicks of Washington,
Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, James E. Clyburn of South Carolina and
Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, all of whom face questions about accepting
travel paid for by lobbyists.
"As we expressed in earlier letters, Madame Leader, it appears more
and more that your repeated calls for an investigation of Mr. DeLay
are more driven by politics than by any real concern for the House
rules," Mr. McHenry, with two other Republicans, wrote in a letter to
Mrs. Pelosi yesterday.
Stop Hillary Pac
Former Congressman John LeBoutillier is helping lead the way for a
Stop Hillary PAC that has launched a website and is trying to
raise money. The site has a lengthy list of radio stations that
LeBoutillier is scheduled to be on.
Arthur Finkelstein's "Stop Her Now" effort was announced earlier and
Hillary has cited Finkelstein’s group as a reason her supporters need
to send her more money.
DeLay’s opponent
Former four-term Rep. Nick Lampson announced his intentions to seek
the Democrat nomination to face Majority Leader Tom DeLay. Lampson
lost in the last election following DeLay’s support of the Texas
legislature redrawing the Congressional districts in that state.
Lampson said that he was certain that the scandals and corruption
would be a part of the campaign to unseat DeaLay.
Social Security an "Earned Benefit?"
Editorial by: Roger Wm. Hughes
"Means testing would change the whole nature of Social Security, which
is supposed to be an earned benefit that you pay into. I'm a little
skeptical," said Rep. E. Clay Shaw Jr. - (R-Fla.) who is a senior
member of the committee that handles Social Security.
One of the great questions is whether Social Security benefits are an
earned benefit. Every worker can receive a calculation about how much
money they will be entitled to upon retirement. The calculation is
based upon the worker’s wage history and how much they have paid into
the Social Security system. From that standpoint, it would appear that
Social Security benefits are an earned benefit.
However, what is really at work is that the government has made a
promise that future generations will pay in at a given rate of
taxation to pay the government’s pledge of entitlement benefits. It is
called a pay-as-you-go system. The money that a worker pays in today
is spent on those who are retired now. The worker paying in today must
rely on future workers to pay for the government’s promise of entitled
benefits.
The government has also established that those retirement benefits
will receive annual cost of living increases that are larger than the
rate of inflation. In fact, the government has promised more than it
can deliver, and because of this Social Security’s future is
insolvent.
There are other reasons for this lack of financial soundness, but the
question is whether Social Security is an earned benefit. With the
unsound financial basis of Social Security, there is evidence that it
is not an earned benefit: If it were an earned benefit, then it should
be able to actuarially fund itself.
The real clue as to whether Social Security is an earned benefit is in
the name itself. Social and security combined is a euphemism for the
public’s general welfare. The emphasis is on welfare.
Social Security, like other public welfare programs, taxes a class of
citizens and then redistributes those taxes. In this case, America has
redirected wealth to senior citizens at a rate previously unknown in
the history of the world. It is a system that expands security to some
at the expense of others. The worker who dies before reaching
retirement doesn’t receive their alleged earned benefits. The retiree
who dies before getting back their alleged earned benefits has
nothing.
No, Social Security is not an earned benefit. It is instead a program
for the general welfare of senior citizens who live a long time.
D.C.’s vote in Congress
Representative Thomas M. Davis III, Republican from Virginia, has
introduced legislation that would allow Washington, D.C.’s congressman
a vote in the House of Representatives. It would not grant voting
rights in the U.S. Senate.
The legislation would cause the House to grow by two members -- to
437-- after the November 2006 election. Washington would gain one
seat, with the other going to the state next in line for a
Congressional seat, namely Utah, which narrowly missed gaining a
fourth House seat after the last reapportionment.
Pulling the trigger
The
Hill reports on the growing frustration by conservatives with Sen.
Bill Frist and the likelihood that the end of filibustering judicial
nominees will be soon:
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s (R-Tenn.) chief of staff has told
conservative activist leaders and business-community representatives
that Frist will soon trigger the so-called "nuclear option" to end
threatened Democratic filibusters of President Bush’s judicial
nominees this month.
The chief of staff, Eric Ueland, said the event will take place in
"less than a month," according to several people who attended a
closed-door meeting late last week.
But social conservatives are anticipating from conversations with
Frist’s staff that the controversial move will take place next week
and are predicting a conservative backlash if Senate Republicans delay
any longer.
Kerry’s plans
The
Hill reports on Sen. John Kerry’s plans to run for President
again:
The political team Kerry has hired to staff his new leadership
political action committee, Keeping America’s Promise, indicates that
he is gearing up for just such a showdown. Kerry has hired John
Giesser, the No. 2 operative at the DNC in 2000 and 2004, to run it
and Jay Dunn, who served as DNC finance director, to manage its
finances.
"Everything he is doing from a political standpoint points in that
direction," said Steve Grossman, who served as DNC chairman in 1998,
of the likelihood of another presidential run for Kerry. "That’s a
very, very high-powered team that he’s keeping in place. You don’t
generally spend those kind of resources and put that effort in
building the A team to run for another term in the U.S. Senate."
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has sent another indication that the
showdown on judicial filibusters is likely. First sent an e-mail
asking that individuals spread the word about a new website that his
PAC created. Here is the e-mail:
I ask that you take a moment of your time and visit
www.fairvotesforjudges.com.
This website was built by my leadership committee, VOLPAC, as a
resource for the American people as we work in the days and weeks
ahead to ensure up-or-down votes for President Bush’s judicial
nominees.
I hope you will use the facts and information on this site to keep up
on the judicial obstruction debate.
And if you believe, as I do, that Senators should do their
Constitutional duty and give President Bush’s judicial nominees fair
up-or-down votes, I ask that you visit the website and use the
information provided to call Democratic Senators and ask them to end
judicial obstruction now.
Thank you for your time.
Bill Frist, M.D.
Senate Majority Leader