Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

 THE DAILY REPORT for Wednesday, October 8, 2003

... QUOTABLE:

  • “I never believed President Bush would retain a 70 or 80 percent approval rating through the election. All these (Democratic) candidates have been tearing him [Bush] down, and the press has been unfair in its coverage of the situation in Iraq.” – Rep. Charles Bass, who will accompany President Bush on his visit to New Hampshire tomorrow.

  • “With anonymous sources abounding in both the AP and Reuters stories, no concrete facts emerged beyond the basic: Donnie Fowler is gone after three weeks on the job. And that can’t be “good” news for Camp Clark.” – Iowa Presidential Watch, on national campaign manager Fowler’s retreat from Clark’s campaign.

  • “Clark’s fall from the NATO wall as Supreme Commander is not something that can be ‘put back together again’ through the office of President of the United States. NATO did not give Clark the title of Supreme Commander because he was an amateur soldier.” – Iowa Presidential Watch, on presidential candidate Wesley Clark.

  •  “If they really want their people to know where they stand on certain issues, they should be there.” – South Carolina NAACP president James Gallman, on the Dem candidates’ snubbing of an NAACP forum

  • “Clark touted his candidacy during paid appearances at DePauw University in Indiana and other campuses after he entered the presidential race on Sept. 17. Under the laws governing the financing of presidential campaigns, candidates cannot be paid by corporations, labor unions, individuals or even universities for campaign-related events. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) considers such paid political appearances akin to a financial contribution to a candidate.” – excerpt from today’s Washington Post article, raising legal question of Clark’s use of paid appearances

… Among the offerings in today’s update:

  • Clark’s national campaign manager – Donnie Fowler – quits

  • Lid blown off Pandora’s Blog Box at Camp Clark

  • Washington Post says Clark may have broken the law in paid speeches

  • Des Moines Register editorial: Come to Iowa, Mr. Clark

  • Now that he’s out, who’ll get the political Graham goodies?

  • Closing the overseas loophole – Edwards says he’ll do it

  • Dr. Dean says “Welcome Baby”

  • Bush heads to New Hampshire

  • Dem candidates draw ire of NAACP for snubbing forum

  • Happy birthday, Dennis

  • Media attention absent from Kucinich’s hip hop/Ralph Nader event last night in Washington D.C.

  • Kerry still campaigning in Iowa, but with scant media attention

  • Today’s IPW Presidential Candidates Schedule

* CANDIDATES/CAUCUSES:

Iowa Presidential Watch Exclusive Report on the Clark Camp Debacle:

It was “Amateur Night” at Camp Clark last night, as national campaign manager Donnie Fowler abandoned his post. Fowler, one of three Gore2000 political pros, resigned leaving ample speculation as to the real cause. A breaking news report by Associated Press political reporter Ron Fournier cited two anonymous associates as saying Fowler had disagreements with communications director Mark Fabiani of California and Washington policy adviser Ron Klain both had been aboard Gore2000 with Fowler. Two main areas of disagreement were connected to Fowler’s departure: Fowler’s concerns that the Internet draft-Clark supporters are not being taken seriously by ‘top campaign advisers’, and Fowler’s frustration with the campaign’s over the top focus on Washington DC and below the radar approach in key states. The AP/Fournier article then drew a parallel to the ill-fated Gore2000 campaign, which was similarly plagued with an overly-Washington focus. The article pointed out Fowler’s computer-savvy asset to the campaign and his support of the grassroots draft Clark supporters. With Fowler out, how would the Internet loyalists and Internet aspect of the campaign fare?… Reuters posted a seemingly conflicting report later in the evening, attributing Fowler’s resignation to a flap over his impending demotion – a glaring bit of revelation that was not in the AP/Fournier story. Again, anonymous sources were used as the source of this information. The article quoted an anonymous campaign source as saying, “Clark needs some more experienced political hands running things." … Meanwhile, two to three hours after AP/Fournier’s first report, a revised version surfaced – or I should say, didn’t surface. Gone was the Yahoo.com front page status (it originally got top billing over the California recall race news!). After much searching, the AP/Fournier article was found buried deep in the links of YahooNews…. no more front page Yahoo news reference. The article had been revised to include the information evidenced in the Reuter’s account, attributing Fowler’s departure to his objection to a pending demotion. With anonymous sources abounding in both the AP and Reuters stories, no concrete facts emerged beyond the basic: Donnie Fowler is gone after three weeks on the job. And that can’t be “good” news for Camp Clark.

…  An IPW exclusive: The resignation last night of Clark campaign manager Donnie Fowler blew the lid off a Pandora’s Blog Box last night, mixing Clark loyalists and not-so-loyalists in a murky mess of postings. The mayhem began at 6:34 pm, as news first hit of Fowler’s resignation. Initial shock and confusion soon gave way, as Clark loyalists posted their deepest -- and prior un-posted – doubts and fears. Many expressed frustration over the campaign: lack of response to emails, poor blog functionality that drives people away, a newsletter sign-up with no newsletter, money paid for a Clark book that never showed up, promises not kept by Clark and top staff to post on the blog personally, lack of supplies and coordination for events, etc, etc. But the hardest hitting comments were about the General himself. Referring to the ring of three running the campaign (now two, with Fowler’s exit), comments appeared ranging from “If he [Clark] can’t manage three men, how does he expect to run the country?” to “No big deal.” Waters thus stirred, comments surfaced on Clark’s lobbying past, lack of substance in his answers, and apparent inability to get his act together regarding the campaign itself. Smelling blog blood, rival bloggers – or trolls (the term for evil-intentioned, assassin bloggers) -- entered the fray. They posed as official Clark blog staff, unleashing a firestorm of false comments. It worked. The woefully inexperienced Clark-sters were soon at each other’s cyber throats, branding their own as “trolls” and kicking them off the blog comments string... IPW COMMENTARY: All of this proves a simple point: Wesley Clark is an amateur. A brilliant, brave, war-medal saturated amateur. The General’s late in the race start, rag-tag conglomeration of Internet foot soldiers and holier-than-thou Gore2000 pros, and bungling verbal flip flops  is painful evidence thereof. Politics is more than head knowledge. It requires the kind of ‘know-how’ that springs from the gut -- not from the head and not from the staff. Perhaps a simple analogy is in order:

Humpty-Dumpty sat on a wall,

Humpty-Dumpty had a great fall,

And all the king’s horses and all the king’s men

Couldn’t put Humpty together again.

 Clark’s fall from the NATO wall as Supreme Commander is not something that can be ‘put back together again’ through the office of President of the United States. NATO did not give Clark the title of Supreme Commander because he was an amateur soldier.


Democratic presidential candidates are definitely NOT beating a path to the NAACP presidential forum, scheduled for this Friday in South Carolina, according to WashingtonTimes.com’s Inside the Beltway. The article quotes South Carolina NAACP president James Gallman as saying, “If they really want their people to know where they stand on certain issues, they should be there.” As of last week, only Carol Moseley Braun and Al Sharpton had agreed to attend. NAACP reacted angrily to the lack of response, bringing on board Dennis Kucinich, John Edwards, Joe Lieberman and Dick Gephardt as a result. However, John Kerry, Howard Dean and Wesley Clark are still holding out committing to the forum. [IPW NOTE: the South Carolina forum is the day after a DNC-sponsored debate in Phoenix, Arizona.]

With Florida Sen. Bob Graham officially out of contention, who’ll get the political Graham goodies? In today’s Des Moines Register, political reporter Thomas Beaumont says most of the spoils will go to newcomer Wesley Clark. Beaumont cites Graham’s 13 Iowa offices and 50 Iowa staffers, a wise acquisition for Camp Clark – if Clark chooses to go for it in earnest in Iowa’s caucuses. According to Graham’s Iowa campaign chairwoman Shelia McGuire Riggs, “I think he [Clark] would be wise to do that. I know that Clark’s national office has been calling. The Graham staff is top-notch and very experienced.”

... An editorial, titled "Come to Iowa, Mr. Clark," pinpoints the fallacy of Clark's avoiding Iowa in his presidential quest. Excerpts: "...To become a complete candidate, Clark needs to share his thinking on the whole array of issues. Iowa would be a good place to begin. As a late entrant, Clark might be tempted to bypass Iowa. The other major contenders have been plying Iowa for many months. Moreover, the caucuses are dominated by Democratic regulars who will not be quick to embrace a newcomer to their party. He might stand a better chance in states that have open primaries instead of caucuses. Nevertheless, Clark should come to Iowa. He would not be expected to win the caucuses or perhaps even to do well, but meeting with Iowans in their homes, cafes, church basements and union halls -- the essence of a caucus campaign -- is the perfect way for the American people to get to know Wesley Clark and for him to know them. Come on, general. Establish a beachhead in Iowa."

Wesley Clark may well remember this day as GONG Wednesday – not only has Clark’s national campaign manager Donnie Fowler quit and his official web blog suffered a cyber-meltdown, now the Washington Post says he may have acted illegally in accepting fees for his campaign speeches. According to the article: “Clark touted his candidacy during paid appearances at DePauw University in Indiana and other campuses after he entered the presidential race on Sept. 17. Under the laws governing the financing of presidential campaigns, candidates cannot be paid by corporations, labor unions, individuals or even universities for campaign-related events. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) considers such paid political appearances akin to a financial contribution to a candidate. Clark is getting paid as much as $30,000 for speeches, according to people familiar with his arrangement. He has two more scheduled for next week.” The article goes on to quote Clark’s general counsel (translation: attorney) as saying the General did not break FEC laws because Clark “is not attempting through those speeches to specifically… influence his election. Oldaker says Clark only ‘incidentally’ mentioned his candidacy in the speeches. [IPW NOTE: more fodder for our ‘amateur’ charge…]

John Kerry campaigned hard in Iowa yesterday – with scant evidence thereof in the media. However, a Sioux City, Iowa NBC affiliate {KTIV} has reported Kerry was pushing his plan for seniors in Sioux City. KTIV also says Kerry visited Cherokee, LeMars, and Sheldon. As reported in yesterday’s IPW News, Kerry is touting his “Compact with America’s Seniors.” Kerry’s Iowa visit also showed up in the Sioux City Journal who reported that Kerry once again entered into his attack on the wealthy. Chief executives of drug companies, Kerry said, are earning multi-million dollar salaries while average Americans are struggling to pay their bills. He said President George W. Bush and his administration are fighting to protect those who are the most protected and comfortable at the expense of everybody else. The system is backwards, Kerry said, adding that he will fight for the average person. Also during his campaign stop Tuesday, Kerry criticized President Bush's foreign policy, claiming that Bush is creating terrorists in the current war on terror.

… Birthday boy: Today is Dennis Kucinich’s birthday. If you’d like to send him a birthday ‘note’ (or ‘not’, as the case may be…) you can do so by visiting campaign website. As for Kucinich’s “Democracy Rising” hip hop, Ralph Nader extravaganza scheduled for last night in Washington DC? Let’s just say the news stories are not abounding. After much searching, including K’s website, IPW has abandoned the quest. Anyone finding a story – send it to IPW.

… John Edwards’ “Work Week” is certainly well-named. The North Carolina senator has been campaigning hard in the target states of New Hampshire and Iowa. Anamosa, Cedar Rapids and Tipton, Iowa, were the towns of choice yesterday for Edwards. In today’s Des Moines Register, Thomas Beaumont reports in on the Edwards visits, and says the emphasis is federal reforms aimed at protecting and creating jobs. According to the article, Edwards proposes closing the tax breaks loophole for U.S. companies that move overseas, rewarding U.S. companies that stay with a 10 percent tax cut and encouraging the hiring of workers with disabilities. The Beaumont article also made mention of Edward’s newest campaign ad (Edward’s seventh), which began airing in Iowa on Monday night. The television ad, which is critical of President Bush’s request for $87 billion for Iraq, begins airing in New Hampshire today.

And regarding People-Powered Howard Dean’s endeavors, the very busy Mr. Beaumont, of the Des Moines Register, gave quick synopsis on Dean’s new plan to help families with young children, called “Welcome Baby.” The voluntary program stems from a Vermont effort – during Dean’s tenure as guv – and shows his focus on early childcare.

Here is today’s IPW Presidential Candidates Schedule:

·         John Edwards in Iowa
12:30 pm Davenport. Location: Hickory Garden Restaurant, 3311 Hickory Grove Road
3:30 pm. Fort Madison. Location: Ivy Bake Shoppe and Cafe, 622 Seventh Street
4:45 pm Keokuk. Location: TBA
7:00 Bloomfield. Location: Get-To-Gether Room, 107 East Jefferson Street

·         Dennis Kucinich's formal announcement of candidacy for President, Cleveland, Ohio
5:30-6:30 pm Announcement. Location: Cleveland, Ohio - Cleveland City Council Chambers, 601 Lakeside Avenue
7-9 pm Reception. Location: Cleveland Convention Center, Cleveland
9-11 pm Fundraising Party. Location: Great Lakes Science Center, Cleveland

·         Joe Lieberman dessert reception in Tucson, AZ, 7:30-9 pm. Location: at the home of David & Ellen Goldstein. Guest $500, couple $1000. Contact Hannah Wood 202-285-0452 hwood@joe2004.com

·         John Kerry campaigns in Tucson, Arizona. Details TBA

 

* ON THE BUSH BEAT:

President Bush is heading to Hew Hampshire tomorrow to speak to the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce and the N.H. Business and Industry Association. According to an article in today’s UnionLeader.com, President Bush’s focus will be on job creation, improving the U.S. economy and winning the nation’s war on terror. The article takes note of Bush’s lower job-approval ratings and New Hampshire’s importance in the 2004 presidential race -- a narrow win for Bush in the 2000 election.  Excerpt quote from Rep. Charles Bass: “I never believed President Bush would retain a 70 or 80 percent approval rating through the election. All these (Democratic) candidates have been tearing him [Bush] down, and the press has been unfair in its coverage of the situation in Iraq.”

* WAR ON TERROR:

More North Korea maneuverings going on in the talks to rein-in their nuclear weapons development. Now North Korea is refusing to allow Japan to participate in the multilateral negotiations. The reason? They say that Japan is too ‘untrustworthy.’ The Associated Press article, carried in today’s Winston-Salem JournalNow.com, quotes Japanese government spokesman, “We simply cannot accept such a statement.” The U.S. and its allies are seeking to restart the six-nation nuclear talks. North Korea has accused Japan of misusing the talks to raise the ‘issue of abduction,’ which North Korea considered already settled.

                                                                                                     click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine