Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

 THE DAILY REPORT for Monday, October 13, 2003

... QUOTABLE:

  • “ [Clark was a] hardworking, ambitious individual . . . [but] some of us were concerned about the fact that he was focused too much upward and not down on the soldiers,” -- Dennis Reimer, a retired general and former Army chief of staff.

  • "I don't think he's [Kucinich] in the race because he thinks he has a chance to win it. He's in the race, at the very least, to give public vent to some of his concerns." -- Dave Rohde, a Michigan State University political science professor, on Kucinich.

  • "There are two ways for you to have lower prescription drug costs. One is you could hire Rush Limbaugh’s housekeeper. Or, you can elect me president of the United States." – John Kerry at Thursday’s debate in Phoenix, referencing Limbaugh’s alleged penchant for prescription painkillers. [on CBSNEWS.com today]

  • "[Bush has to] take charge, settle this dispute. Let your secretary of defense, state, and your vice president know, 'This is my policy. Any one of you that divert from the policy is off the team.' " – U.S. Senator Joe Biden, yesterday on CBS’ “Meet the Press”

  • “She [Hillary Clinton] hasn’t done the groundwork. She’s probably not ready for a presidential campaign, and if she got out there and performed badly it would devastate any chance for her in the future.”  -- Emmett H. Buell, professor of political science at Denison University.

… Among the offerings in today’s update:

  • Lieberman launches 6-state, 5-day tour – tax shakeup proposal to come today in NH

  • President Bush under fire

  • Clark’s Pentagon past not a rosy one

  • Edwards’ TV ad

  • Kucinich formally announces candidacy today

  • Has Hillary run out of time?

  • CBS News clocks the talk

  • Dean Web Log unresponsive to IPW’s Joe Trippi challenge
    (regarding campaign double-teaming tactics)

* CANDIDATES/CAUCUSES:

Here is IPW’s follow up to yesterday’s IPW report regarding the Dean Campaign’s Official Web Log (blog) holier-than-thou response to the Kerry-Gephardt double-teaming of Dean AND the report that Dean campaign manager Joe Trippi appears equally guilty due to his attempt to hook up with Gephardt staff to double team on rival candidate Wesley Clark. IPW posted the following comment on the Dean Blog yesterday: “

“I am the webmaster for conservative website www.IowaPresidentialWatch.com. I often check in on the various blogs to read comments posted. Regarding the Kerry-Gephardt alliance against Dean: not one of you has responded to Joe Trippi's attempt to join forces with Gephardt's crew against Wesley Clark. This puzzles me, as the majority of you seem highly truth-oriented. I am preparing a piece for today's website and unfortunately cannot find any comment here acknowledging Joe Trippi's equally damning actions. Whassup?
Posted by Linda2 in Iowa at October 12, 2003 06:02 AM”

 To which the Official Dean Campaign Web Log managed only ONE response:

“Would love to see a reliable source for your remark about Trippi & Gephardt sweety.
Posted by JIm Whitaker at October 12, 2003 10:45 AM”

IPW extends thanks to JIm Whitaker, but takes note at the lack of even-handedness that is event in all campaigns – even Dr. Dean’s. Playing the ‘show me the reliable sources’ card is pretty lame. But at least ONE Deanie responded

 … Smokin’ Joe Lieberman has launched a six-state, five-day Tour, beginning today in New Hampshire. CNN.com carries the story today, excerpts: “Lieberman, the most conservative '04 Dem, and Kucinich, one of the most liberal, will embark today on comprehensive "tours" designed to give each a much-needed splash of good press. The senator is focusing on "integrity" in six states over five days but will make the biggest headline by proposing a shakeup to the U.S. tax code today in New Hampshire. … Lieberman hopes to make news. Real news. Tax-code news. The senator begins his tour Monday morning at a breakfast in Hartford, Connecticut. He then travels to New Hampshire, where aides say he'll release an economic agenda -- in book form -- that calls for a major restructuring of the U.S. tax code. Under his plan, a married couple earning $50,000 annually would save up to $1,000, according to details Lieberman provided to The Associated Press. Lieberman would do that by changing income tax brackets. He also would reverse Bush-backed tax breaks given to people earning more than $200,000 annually and impose a limited surtax on them. Lieberman is scheduled then to take this tax message to Oklahoma on Tuesday, South Carolina on Wednesday, and Florida on Thursday. On Friday, the senator will conclude his tour with a "major" speech to the Arab-American Institute in Detroit. Also, this word from the Lieberman campaign: George Stephanopoulos is traveling on part of the tour, and his segment on Lieberman is expected to air on ABC's "This Week" next Sunday.”

Dennis Kucinich begins his three-day, eleven-state Tour, beginning today in hometown Cleveland, Ohio. According to CNN News, Kucinich formally announces his 2004 bid at City Hall at noon, and takes time for a reception at the Cleveland Sheraton Hotel before dashing off to Detroit (Michigan), Manchester (New Hampshire), Madison (Wisconsin) and Albuquerque (New Mexico). Tomorrow’s roster? Albuquerque, Austin (Texas), Oklahoma City, Minneapolis (Minnesota), Chicago (Illinois, and St. Louis (Missouri). Wednesday Kucinich will appear at St. Louis events and then attend the AARP Forum in Des Moines, Iowa.

So, exactly how much talk-time did each Democratic candidate get in last week’s nationally-televised DNC-sponsored debate? CBS News has the answer:

·        Dean: 14 min, 7 seconds

·        Kerry: 12 min, 31 seconds

·        Clark: 10 min, 36 seconds

·        Gephardt: 10 min, 2 seconds

·        Lieberman: 9 min, 26 seconds

·        Braun: 8 min, 39 seconds

·        Sharpton: 8 min, 28 seconds

·        Edwards: 8 min, 00 seconds

·        Kucinich: 5 min, 9 seconds

Wesley Clark’s Pentagon past holds room for question, regarding Clark’s ability to lead. Today’s BostonGlobe.com carries an Associated Press article highlighting some of the prickly spots, titled, “Pentagon battles dog Clark.” Excerpts: “Wesley Clark, the retired four-star general who is running for president, got himself in hot water with his Pentagon bosses more than once in his 34-year military career. Clark matter-of-factly recounts when the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff grumbled that Clark had "one foot on a banana peel and one foot in the grave." Less than a year later, Clark was yanked out of his job as NATO's supreme allied commander. …it is notable that a number of fellow retired officers now speak frankly about what they see as the Democratic candidate's shortcomings as a leader. Last month, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Hugh Shelton, gave a barbed answer when asked what he thought about Clark as a presidential candidate. "I will tell you the reason he came out of Europe early had to do with integrity and character issues," Shelton said. "I'll just say Wes won't get my vote." … Dennis Reimer, a retired general and former Army chief of staff, describes Clark as an intelligent, "hardworking, ambitious individual . . . [but] some of us were concerned about the fact that he was focused too much upward and not down on the soldiers.”

Perhaps Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards could have picked a better day to begin airing his television ad than the day after the California recall election. But, the Edwards campaign pressed on, and the TV ads took to the airwaves. Now, a week after they began running, the BostonGlobe.com offers opine, titled, “Edwards milks Southern charm.” Excerpts: “… it stands to reason that his television ads would try to capitalize on his charms. Set in a small-town cafe somewhere in America (hint: Old Glory hanging in the window), it's a verite-style glimpse of Edwards in his shirt sleeves, addressing a crowd of regular folks. Edwards challenges President Bush's tax-cut plan … while touting his intention to provide health insurance for every child in the United States. No details on the health plan are given. Just a reference to Edwards's website, some dramatic, soaring music suited for movies on Lifetime, and approval from the regular folks, who nod as Edwards speaks and applaud when he finishes. . Kathleen Hall Jamieson, director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, agrees that the ad helps solidify Edwards's image. For once, he doesn't mention that he's the son of a millworker. But she wonders if the ad is timed well enough to accomplish what Edwards badly needs: a media buzz. "Any ad that is an attack on George Bush is more newsworthy than any ad that doesn't attack George Bush." But launching your ad the day after California voters ousted their governor and elected Arnold Schwarzenegger? Perhaps unwise. The press, she said, was a little distracted last week.”

… Lowest-tiered in the polls, Dennis Kucinich doggedly presses on today, formally announcing his candidacy for president. BostonGlobe.com carries the Associated Press story. Excerpts: “…Kucinich, who has been campaigning for months, planned to make the announcement Monday in his hometown of Cleveland, the first stop of a 12-state tour that will include Michigan, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and Iowa. … The kickoff speech at Cleveland's City Hall serves as a reminder of Kucinich's political triumphs and bitter disappointments. … He raised $1.7 million during a three-month period ending June 30 and hopes to show an additional $1.5 million when campaign finance reports are filed Wednesday. "I don't think he's in the race because he thinks he has a chance to win it," said Dave Rohde, a Michigan State University political science professor. "He's in the race, at the very least, to give public vent to some of his concerns."

* ON THE BUSH BEAT:

Criticism of President Bush’s handling of the Iraq reconstruction now comes from within his own party. High-ranking Republican Senator Richard Lugar (Indiana), appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press” yesterday and spoke of his concerns. The WashingtonPost.com ‘OnPolitics’ column carried the story, titled, “Senators Say Bush Needs to Take Control.” Excerpts: “A key Republican lawmaker urged President Bush yesterday to take control of his fractious foreign policy team and plans for Iraq's reconstruction… "The president has to be president," Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "That means the president over the vice president, and over these secretaries" of state and defense. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice "cannot carry that burden alone." … Lugar noted that Vice President Cheney, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Rice had given speeches whose tone "was distinctly different" and that senators were rightly concerned about "the strength, the coherence of our policies." … He and the ranking member of the committee, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), predicted narrow approval of the $87 billion Iraq reconstruction request. … Biden, responding to news that Bush had asked Rice to unify the differing views on Iraq, said Bush had to "take charge, settle this dispute. Let your secretary of defense, state, and your vice president know, 'This is my policy. Any one of you that divert from the policy is off the team.' "

* THE CLINTON COMEDIES: 

Has Hillary Rodham Clinton run out of time to enter the 2004 presidential race? An online Fox News report today: some say, Nope. Headline, “Clock Ticking for a Hillary Presidential Bid.” Excerpts: “Oct. 4 “was the 12th anniversary of Bill Clinton running, so most people have seen that date as a benchmark as the latest date a candidate could get in the race to win,” Democratic Party spokeswoman Deborah DeShong said. Hillary Clinton has regularly and clearly denied an interest in running in the 2004 election, but that has not stopped rumors from circulating, or some Democrats from hoping the New York senator makes a go of it. But success in a presidential contest is heavily dependent on grassroots organization and early campaigning. … “Conventional wisdom is sometimes wrong, but we do have a process that favors and indeed has prohibitively favored front-runners who start early, raise money and build organizations in the early states,” said Emmett H. Buell, professor of political science at Denison University. “She hasn’t done the groundwork. She’s probably not ready for a presidential campaign, and if she got out there and performed badly it would devastate any chance for her in the future.” … “People are lining up their commitments. The longer it goes on, the harder it would be to disengage people,” said Donald Robinson, professor of government at Smith College. Robinson does not agree, however, that it's too late for Clinton to enter the contest. … There is no deadline to be on the ballot in the Iowa caucus, but for many other states the deadlines are rapidly approaching. ….Experts say the longer Clinton denies she will make a bid, the sooner Democrats are going to have to accept her decision.”

* WAR/TERROR:

North Korea news: Article today in the Washington Times, headlined, “North Korea Says Pact is Key to Standoff.” Excerpts: “North Korean demands for a nonaggression pact with the United States are the key to any resolution of the nuclear standoff between Pyongyang and Washington, North Korean diplomats say. "A nonaggression pact is the litmus paper for a settlement," said a North Korean diplomat who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The United States, while saying it has no plans to attack North Korea, has been unwilling to negotiate a formal agreement to that effect. "That's not in the cards," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said last week. However Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said Friday that the Bush administration has "some ideas with respect to security assurances that we will be presenting in due course." The North Korean official also said during a visit to Geneva late last week that the United States had been unwilling to negotiate seriously during six-way talks in Beijing, and said the Bush administration had failed to respond to Pyongyang's proposals. Asked Friday about the prospects for another round of talks, Mr. Powell said the North Koreans were reported to be considering a new round of talks in December but nothing has been scheduled. … A diplomat close to both Washington and Pyongyang, who declined to be identified, said: "I don't think the North Koreans realize this is a different [U.S.] government to the previous one. "They need to be aware this is a very ideological administration. One cannot rule it out that in the end [the United States] might bomb them." So far, South Korea and Japan have discouraged the United States from such action, the diplomat said.

                                                                                                     click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine