Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news">

Iowa primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

IOWA DAILY REPORT

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Our Mission: to hold the Democrat presidential candidates accountable for their comments and allegations against President George W. Bush, to make citizens aware of false statements or claims by the Democrat candidates, and to defend the Bush Administration and set the record straight when the Democrats make false or misleading statements about the Bush-Republican record.

General News

Candidates & Caucuses

Clinton Comedies

Iowa/National Politics

Morning Summary

War & Terrorism

Federal Issues

Iowa Issues

Opinions 

Iowa Sports

Iowa Weather 

Iowaisms

 Today's Cartoon

The Bush Beat

 Cartoon Archive

PAGE 1                                                                                                                   Monday, September 8, 2003


DEMS "There is no copyright on ideas.” -- reaction from Polk County Democrat Party Chairman Tom Henderson to latest Dean v Kerry episode.

DEAN

“The sudden infighting between Lieberman and Kerry, two New England senators battling to upend front-runner Howard Dean of Vermont, showcases frustrations simmering among the crowded field and attempts by candidates to break out from the nine-person pack.”Boston Herald’s David R. Guarino


“Dean, the front-runner in polls in the early states, doesn't talk about his family or where he grew up (perhaps because a childhood in the Hamptons with a stockbroker father doesn't quite fit the log-cabin genre).”Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz, reporting on early TV spots by the top Dem candidates


“Dean could peak too soon.” – Editorial, Christian Science Monitor

KERRY

“He's fishing, he's just fishing, I'm not worried about it.”Kerry, responding to Lieberman charge he’s a “waffler”

HISPANIC
VOTE

“It sets up an interesting political dynamic. Will the Bush administration decide they have to do something before 2004? Will they decide they'd rather disappoint Latinos and Catholics and some of their business supporters, or divide and anger some in the populist base that think there's too many immigrants already?” – Frank Sharry, executive director of the Natural Immigration Forum, commenting on the immigration amnesty issue


 “Immigration has now become a litmus test for Hispanic voters.”Republican pollster Raul Damas

GENERAL NEWS:  Among the offerings in today's update:

  • It’s all or nothing for Edwards

  • Gephardt and Dean weigh in on President Bush’s address to the nation on Iraq

  • Des Moines Register's Thomas Beaumont reports on latest Dean/Kerry spat

  • From FOXNews.com -- Hillary on warpath: Announced yesterday she’ll oppose Bush EPA appointee Leavitt

  • Columnist Novak: Edwards still ducking – dodging appearances on the toughest political interview shows

  • Orlando Sentinel: Graham to skip next wannabe debate

  • Apparently tired of attacking Dean, Kerry and Lieberman square off over whether Kerry’s a “waffler”

  • Washington Times: Immigrant amnesty issue could become “litmus test” concern for Hispanic voters – Will the eight pro-amnesty wannabes at Thursday night’s debate force GWB policy review?

  • Washington Post’s Kurtz: Initial media buys expose the campaign personalities – and image goals -- of the top-tier wannabes

  • Christian Science Monitor editorial says Dean looks formidable, but it would be foolish to write off other wannabes

  • Quad City Times reporter Ed Tibbetts reports that Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley will be running for re-election to the U.S. Senate without a rival

All these stories below and more.

 CANDIDATES & CAUCUSES

FOR EDWARDS, IT’S WHITE HOUSE – OR BUST. North Carolina wannabe announces he will not seek re-election to the Senate. Coverage by AP’s Gary D. Robertson from Raleigh: “John Edwards will not run for re-election to the Senate in 2004 so he can concentrate on seeking the Democratic presidential nomination, a state party official said Sunday. The North Carolina senator wrote a letter received Sunday by state Democratic Party chairwoman Barbara Allen announcing his decision, state party executive director Scott Falmlen said. ‘I ... decided that I will not seek re-election to the United States Senate in order to devote all of my energy to running for president,’ Edwards wrote to Allen. Edwards was first elected to the Senate in 1998 but announced in January he would seek the presidential nomination.” More on Edwards’ decision in Tuesday’s Daily Report.

… WHOTV.com, coverage by the Washington-AP – “President Bush's speech to the nation on Iraq did little to change the minds of his Democratic rivals for the presidency. Congressman Dick Gephardt gives credit to Bush for recognizing that he has been going down the wrong path. Now he says the administration must begin the process of "fully engaging" America's allies and sharing the burden of building a stable democracy in Iraq. Howard Dean compared Iraq with Vietnam. He says the government -- quote -- is again "feeding misinformation to the American people in order to justify an enormous commitment of US troops." Dean says Iraq has pulled the country's attention and resources away from homeland security and the economy.”

... For everyone wondering when Kerry would begin attacking Dean, they have misjudged the situation. Dean, in a phone interview with Des Moines Register Reporter Thomas Beaumont, has Dean blasting Kerry for mimicking his position of bringing in the U.N and specifically Arabic speaking peace keepers. Kerry spokesperson David Wade counters the claim of mimicking Dean by siting a Senate speech of Oct. 9, 2002 where Kerry calls for post-war assistance from nations in the region. Dean further lays claim to the fact that Kerry is copying his position at the same time he is claiming he has no foreign policy experience. In the article, reaction from Polk County Democrat Party Chairman Tom Henderson is as follows: “I just don’t think they [caucus attendees] listen to that [spats]. There is no copyright on ideas.”

From the House of Political Pancakes: Kerry confronts Lieberman accusation that he’s a serial “waffler.” He says Smokin’ Joe is just fishing for headlines. Headline from yesterday’s Boston Herald: “Miffed Kerry responds to Lieberman’s attack” Excerpt of report from Albuquerque by the Herald’s David R. Guarino:  “Sen. John F. Kerry yesterday tried to shake off the ‘waffler’ tag given him by opponent Joseph Lieberman, saying his struggling rival is just fishing to get headlines. Appearing at an Albuquerque community center the morning after the Democrats first major debate, Kerry shrugged off Lieberman's post-debate attacks on Kerry's Iraq stance. ‘He's fishing, he's just fishing, I'm not worried about it,’ Kerry said of Lieberman, a Connecticut senator and the 2000 Democratic vice presidential nominee. ‘I think I've been clearer than Joe Lieberman, who only recently has started to try to talk about how we ought to be managing (post war Iraq).’ The sudden infighting between Lieberman and Kerry, two New England senators battling to upend front-runner Howard Dean of Vermont, showcases frustrations simmering among the crowded field and attempts by candidates to break out from the nine-person pack.  In the post-debate spin room, Lieberman was asked why he only targeted Dean during the debate.  Lieberman responded by teeing off on Kerry, who during his recent campaign announcement tour said he voted in the Senate on the Iraqi resolution just as a threat to Saddam Hussein - not to go to war.  ‘It was clearly an authorization for President Bush to use force against Saddam, I don't get it,’ Lieberman said.  ‘(Kerry's) been criticizing Howard Dean for lacking experience to lead America in the world today. It's true, it's not the best time to put a rookie in charge of our country's future, it hasn't been a good time to have a cowboy (in Bush) in charge of our country's future,’ Lieberman said. ‘But we also don't need a waffler in charge of our country's future.’  But Kerry said yesterday he always maintained the vote was to authorize force -- despite his most recent statements. ‘Of course it was, I've said that everywhere I go’ Kerry told reporters. ‘The threat came from the authorization, it's that simple. Without the authorization, you wouldn't have had a threat - it's very clear. My language has been clear from day one, it's been the clearest of anybody.’  Kerry said he, unlike Lieberman and the other Democrats, warned Bush that he needed more support from Americans and international allies before rushing into war. He said the post-war debacles have proved him right. ‘My experience comes out stronger as a consequence of the way President Bush has screwed up what we are doing in Iraq, it's what I predicted,’ Kerry said. ‘Joe Lieberman never talked about those things, nor did the other candidates.’”

 A setback for wannabes – especially Gephardt – hoping to secure AFL-CIO endorsement: AFSCME decides to delay decision until November. Excerpt from Associated Press report: “One of the nation's largest unions will wait until November to decide which Democrat to endorse in next year's presidential race. Gerald McEntee, president of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, said Friday the most important criteria will be finding the candidate with the best chance of winning the White House. ‘We are ready to support a Democrat who supports our issues most of the time, if not all of the time, but who is electable, who is capable of defeating George Bush,’ McEntee said. Most of the nine presidential hopefuls will meet with the organization's executive board next week, with each making a final push for support from the 1.4 million-member union, one of the largest, fastest-growing and politically active in the AFL-CIO. McEntee hinted earlier this summer that he favored Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, but the union reportedly is taking a second look at the field to judge the strength of Howard Dean's surge in early polls in New Hampshire and Iowa. Kerry had some traction early on and seems to be regaining it,’ McEntee said Friday.”

… “Graham to skip his next debate” – headline from today’s Orlando Sentinel. Report says Graham expecting to get $50,000 at FL fundraiser – the same day Bush sweeps into the state to “pick up a fast $2 million.” Excerpt from report by the Sentinel’s political ace Mark Silva: “Sen. Bob Graham will skip a debate next week and instead return to Florida to raise money for his lagging presidential campaign. The reason? There will be many more debates among the Democratic contenders in the months to come, his campaign says. But Graham also is scrambling to raise money before a key deadline at month's end that will be a measure of his campaign's viability. In the meantime, while Graham collects an expected $50,000 in Pensacola on Tuesday, President Bush will sweep into the state on the same day and pick up a fast $2 million for his re-election bid in Jacksonville and Fort Lauderdale. Graham will forgo a debate in Baltimore sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus to tend to his fund raising in Florida -- but Graham is pledging to attend another Black Caucus-sponsored debate in Detroit in October. Pensacola trial lawyer Fred Levin will serve as host Tuesday for a fund-raiser at which they hope to provide another $50,000. Levin also thinks that if Graham's presidential bid falls short, the senator will seek re-election to a fourth term. Graham maintains that he is running for president and does not intend to appear on any other ballot in 2004. However, with the permission of his contributors, the presidential money Graham raises could be used to finance a Senate campaign. The Graham campaign asked the Democratic National Committee if Graham could appear via satellite at another party-sponsored debate on Sept. 23 in Phoenix. But the DNC insisted that Graham attend. The Phoenix debate, to be staged in one of the earliest-voting winter primary-election states, is one of six encounters the party is sponsoring…Fund raising has become one of the greatest challenges for Graham since Howard Dean, the former governor of Vermont, started surging. Money is just one measure in which Graham is trailing a crowded field of Democrats. He trails most of them in early polling for both Iowa's Jan. 19 caucuses and New Hampshire's Jan. 27 primary. Graham raised just $2 million in the most recent fund-raising quarter, after raising $1.1 million with a late-starting campaign formally launched in early May. This is a fraction of the more than $10 million that Dean has reported this year.”

Profiles in No Courage: Edwards dodging tough interviews on national TV shows. Under the subhead “Edwards Still Ducking,” columnist Robert Novak reported in today’s Chicago Sun-Times: “Sen. John Edwards, trying to restart his flagging presidential campaign, scheduled a second straight soft interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulus Aug. 14 without making himself available to the other three Sunday talk shows in proper rotation. On July 10, Edwards wrote Tim Russert of NBC's ‘Meet the Press’ that ‘I'm looking forward to finding the time to come to your show.’ The senator admittedly had not performed well under Russert's questioning May 5, 2002. Edwards has kept away from ‘Meet the Press’ since then, while finding time to engage in easygoing dialogue aboard his campaign van with Stephanopoulus that was broadcast on ABC's ‘This Week.’ Edwards also has been dodging non-Sunday television programs that ask tough questions. He has not gone on CNN's ‘Crossfire’ since May 23, 2001, after appearing there seven times the previous nine months.”

… “The Tortoises and Dr. Dean” – headline from Christian Science Monitor commentary. Editorial says Dean looks formidable, but it would be foolish to write off other wannabes. Excerpt: “Election pundits are out in full force, what with Labor Day past and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts officially launching his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination. (What exactly was he doing before Tuesday?) Unfortunately for the candidates, the public has yet to pay much attention. According to a new CBS News poll, two-thirds of those questioned couldn't even name one Democratic presidential candidate. That public apathy (not unusual at this point in a race) makes the constant speculation over who's the front-runner the political equivalent of a sports-radio call-in show. And the California recall is stealing whatever limelight the national contenders might have. According to the CBS poll, Sen. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut draws the most support from registered Democrat voters --with 14 percent. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean and Rep. Richard Gephardt of Missouri are the only other candidates garnering double digits. (Of course, there is no national primary.) But for the inside-the-Beltway crowd, Dr. Dean is the real front- runner. He's so far out front in fundraising that he may dispense with public financing. His hard-line position against the war in Iraq and tough criticism of President Bush warm the hearts of liberal-activists. He's also surged to statistical leads in key-state polls -- outdistancing previous favorites Kerry in New Hampshire and Gephardt in Iowa. Even so, the race remains wide open. At this point in 1996, Republican Sen. Bob Dole held a wide lead in New Hampshire, yet lost to Patrick Buchanan on primary day. Dean could peak too soon. He could falter in a barrage of negative press coverage. Events could overtake his campaign themes. Another candidate (Gen. Wesley Clark?) could enter the race and upset the poll numbers. At present, the Vermonter appears formidable. But to write off the others would be foolish - and unhealthy for a democracy's political market.”

Gephardt casts House “no” vote on private-school voucher proposal, but it passes by two votes anyway. Gephardt cast a rare vote Friday as the House narrowly approved private-school vouchers for poor students in the District of Columbia. The $10 million plan was approved on a 205-203 vote with four Democrats joining 201 Republicans. Kucinich, who has the best voting record of the Dem wannabes, was recorded as “not voting.” Three members of the IA delegation – GOPs King, Latham and Nussle – supported the legislation, Dem Boswell voted “no” and Republican Leach did not vote.

The Hispanic “litmus test” – will Bush relax policy on amnesty for illegal aliens” The Dem hopefuls at the New Mexico debate all support amnesty, increasing the pressure on the White House. Headline from yesterday’s Washington Times: “Democrats embrace amnesty for illegals” Coverage – excerpted – from report by the Times’ Stephen Dinan: “All eight of the Democratic presidential contenders at Thursday's debate embraced amnesty for illegal aliens now in the United States, pushing the issue onto the national stage for the presidential contest. In a debate specifically designed to showcase the candidates for Hispanic voters who were increasingly intrigued by President Bush's outreach in 2000 and 2001, the Democrats went on record in support of amnesty, a high-profile issue in that community…All of the candidates agreed that a form of amnesty is necessary for some or all of the estimated 9 million illegal immigrants living and working in the United States already. ‘I believe we have to change it. It's a matter of human rights, a matter of civil right, a matter of fairness to Americans. It's essential to have immigration reform,’ said Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, who said he wants instant citizenship for those who have lived in the United States for about five years. Among the others, Rep. Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri introduced a bill a year ago to grant legal status to those who have lived in the United States for five years and worked for two, and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut introduced his own immigration proposal earlier this week to promote legalization, a guest-worker program and increased due process for immigration applicants.  All of the candidates present spoke about the contributions of immigrants and criticized the Bush administration, which had been working on a broad legalization accord before the September 11 terrorist attacks, for not having returned to the issue. Mr. [Frank] Sharry, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said the pressure is now on Mr. Bush. ‘It sets up an interesting political dynamic. Will the Bush administration decide they have to do something before 2004?’ Mr. Sharry said. ‘Will they decide they'd rather disappoint Latinos and Catholics and some of their business supporters, or divide and anger some in the populist base that think there's too many immigrants already?’ But Roy Beck, executive director of Numbers USA, which lobbies for immigration limits and a crackdown on illegal immigrants, said the Democrats have staked out a position at odds with what's best for average workers. ‘It's the abandonment of the American worker. It's an astounding development for the Democratic Party — the national leaders — to abandon the American worker like this,’ Mr. Beck said. ‘They've done something I didn't think was possible. They're going to make Bush seem very moderate and pro-worker,’ he said. Polls show a majority of Americans oppose amnesties, while a plurality would go even further and begin to reduce legal immigration. But amnesties or ‘normalization’ of illegal immigrants' status polls well among Hispanics. One poll last month from Raul Damas, a Republican pollster, found that 83 percent of registered Hispanic voters support legalization.  ‘Immigration has now become a litmus test for Hispanic voters,’ Mr. Damas said, who added that kind of support among Hispanics has allowed Democrats to abuse the issue. He said Republicans must counter by putting forth sensible plans that couch immigration reform as a national-security issue.”

Sharecroppers, milkman, anti-Bush, courage – The themes for the initial flight of media spots being seen by the initial players in the 2004 nominating contests. Washington Post media guru Howard Kurtz says the wannabes are projecting the image that they feel best suits them in early TV spots. Headline from today’s Post: “Media Primary Commences as Democrats Run First Ads” Excerpts from Kurtz’ report: “ John Edwards talks about hailing from a family of sharecroppers. Dick Gephardt says his father was a milkman. Howard Dean says he's the man to stand up to President Bush, unlike many timid Democrats in Washington. John Kerry talks about the courage of Americans -- while using a flag-bedecked backdrop that may remind viewers of his own courage in Vietnam. The initial television ads of the Democratic presidential candidates, even at this early stage, shed considerable light on how they want to present themselves to primary voters in the only format they fully control. If you get just one chance to make a good first impression, these 30-second snapshots are an important clue to each man's media strategy. Despite their stylistic differences, the commercials, running mainly in Iowa and New Hampshire, all trumpet the need for jobs and, almost as often, expanded health care -- an issue about which Democrats had been skittish since the Clinton health plan crashed and burned in 1994. The ads all strike an us-vs.-them tone in which the candidates sell themselves as champions of the middle class. ‘I'm not sure how much it does with voters,’ said former Clinton White House spokesman Joe Lockhart. ‘But the unwritten rule is if you don't do well in the media primary, you may not get to the real primary. Obviously, Dean has passed the test, so he's in a different place than everyone else. But several of the others have to move numbers to keep reporters from dismissing them.’ Republican media consultant Don Sipple agreed that ‘the shelf life of early advertising is very short. But these candidates need to show movement in key early states in order to raise money around the country.’…Dean, the front-runner in polls in the early states, doesn't talk about his family or where he grew up (perhaps because a childhood in the Hamptons with a stockbroker father doesn't quite fit the log-cabin genre). Instead, he portrays himself as the anti-Bush, saying he wants ‘to change George Bush's reckless foreign policy, stand up for affordable health care and create new jobs…Has anyone really stood up against George Bush and his policies? Don't you think it's time somebody did?’…Kerry says nothing about himself in the three ads unveiled this week, taped at Iowa and New Hampshire speeches. But two of them mention ‘courage,’ which dovetails with the Vietnam-era photo of Kerry on his Web site, featuring the headline: ‘The courage to fight for America.’ The colorful, fast-moving ads, which keep cutting to cheering crowds, hit the unemployment issue hard. ‘Three million jobs lost, too many of them in the heartland," Kerry says in one. ‘That is an astonishing failure. If I am president, I will roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy so we can invest in education, health care and the skills of our workers. We need to be on the side of America's middle class."…Edwards takes a far more biographical approach. Appearing in rolled-up shirtsleeves, the freshman senator opens one ad in his hometown of Robbins, N.C., ‘a place where values like hard work, family, faith and community mattered. And they still do. But today our small towns and rural areas are hurting, and Washington doesn't seem to care.’ He says he's got a ‘detailed plan’ to boost jobs, schools and health care in rural America…Edwards also plays the class card against Bush, the son of a president and grandson of a senator. ‘My grandmother came from a family of sharecroppers,’ he says in a third ad. ‘My father worked in a cotton mill all his life, and I helped out there in the summers…George Bush -- he comes from a very different place. He believes if we take care of folks at the top, that somehow the whole country will be lifted.’…While Gephardt, a veteran House member from Missouri, is better known, he uses his first ad to cast himself not as a dull legislator but as the product of the working heartland who will ‘fight for America's middle class.’Gephardt has produced one spot about his record, making him the only candidate to tout President Bill Clinton. The former House minority leader recalls his 1993 role in narrowly passing the Clinton economic plan (including tax increases, which are not mentioned). While ‘every Republican’ opposed the plan, says the ad, flashing a black-and-white picture of former Georgia representative Newt Gingrich, ‘Democratic leader Dick Gephardt digs in and wins the fight in Congress by one vote,’ leading to ‘millions of new jobs.’


go to page 2                                                                                                             click here  to read past Iowa Daily Reports

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine