Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

The Bush Beat

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Official portrait of President George W. Bush.George W. Bush

excerpts from the Iowa Daily Report

January 1-15, 2004


  • "The economy has turned around, we won the war and we've captured Saddam," said Michael Barone of U.S. News and World Report.  (1/2/2004)

  • "I think George Bush is going to win in a walk," Pat Robertson said on his "700 Club." "I really believe I'm hearing from the Lord it's going to be like a blowout election in 2004. It's shaping up that way."  (1/2/2004)


  • "Our reforms insist on high standards because we know every child can learn. Our reforms call for testing because the worst discrimination is to ignore a school's failure to teach every child," President Bush said.  (1/3/2004)


Different foreign policy views

The NY Times offers a lengthy article covering the differences between the Democrats’ and Bush’s foreign policy views. The Democrats are trying to retain some aspect of the title of Defender of the Public during these times of war on terrorism. Much of the debate centers around America’s unilateral position of power in the world:

The consequences of unilateralism in Iraq dominate the debate. Yet if you talk to Democratic policy experts, Iraq rarely appears as the country's top national security priority. In ''An American Security Policy,'' a study ordered by Tom Daschle, the Senate minority leader, and written by a group that included top former Clinton aides like William Perry, the former defense secretary; Madeleine Albright, the former secretary of state; and Sandy Berger, the former national security adviser, Iraq appears as only the fourth of six major areas of concern. The first is ''The Loose Nukes Crisis in North Korea,'' and the second is the overall problem of weapons of mass destruction in Russia, Pakistan, Iran and elsewhere.

A unifying aspect for the Bush team is Condoleezza Rice during the 2000 campaign:

''The belief that the support of many states -- or even better, of institutions like the United Nations -- is essential to the legitimate exercise of power'' proceeds from a deep discomfort with the fact of America's power. This discomfort is, in turn, the residuum of Vietnam.

The article also points to the arrogance and vulnerability of Wesley Clark’s arguments with the Bush administration:

Clark embodies what is most powerful, but perhaps also what is most vulnerable, about the Democratic critique of the Bush administration's national security strategy. Clark's first book, ''Waging Modern War,'' is a minutely detailed account of the Kosovo air campaign, the first, and so far only, war fought by the NATO alliance, which Clark conducted as NATO's Supreme Allied Commander. You could easily read the book as a primer on the futility of multilateral warfare, for Clark describes his endless battles with the Pentagon, the White House and our 18 allies. On several occasions, the war effort almost collapsed from dissension. But it didn't: the Serbs ultimately withdrew, the Kosovars returned home and for several years now an uneasy peace has reigned in Kosovo. ''The real lesson of Kosovo is this,'' Clark writes: ''To achieve strategic success at minimal cost, a structured alliance whose actions are guided by consensus and underwritten by international law is likely to be far more effective and efficient in the long term.''

Clark further argues:

''It's not where you bomb and what building you blow up that determines the outcome of the war.”… ''That's what we teach majors in the Air Force to do -- make sure you hit the target. It's the overarching diplomacy, the leverage you bring to bear, what happens afterward on the ground, that gives you your success. And for that you need nations working together.'' That, in a nutshell, is the Wesley Clark alternative paradigm of national security.

The article points out the debate is not about whether there is a war on terrorism but rather how to conduct that war. There are no McGovernite doves here save one:

…The foreign-policy debate is no longer ideological, if ideology has to do with differing conceptions of ends, rather than means. The Democrats are not really a peace party. Defense spending, once the great threshold issue separating hawks from doves, has been laid to rest. You have to go as far to the left as Dennis Kucinich to find a candidate who wants to cut, rather than increase, defense spending. (1/4/2004)

Preparing for Dean

The Associated Press reports the Bush team is preparing their campaign for Dean. The report shows they are not over confident of beating Dean:

Bush's chief political adviser, Karl Rove, reportedly at one point had told Republican activists that Dean was the dream candidate for the Bush campaign.

But Rove and Bush re-election campaign manager Ken Mehlman have been far more guarded in their recent assessments of the Dean challenge, according to those close to the campaign.

Republicans worry that in the face of continuing job losses in industrial states, many of the "Reagan Democrats" who supported Bush in 2000 may return to the Democratic fold. Bush's constant revisits to the Midwest and his fleeting support of steel tariffs reflect this concern. (1/4/2004)


  • "Dean has proven himself to be a pretty darn effective campaigner, so I don't want to take anything away from him," Republican political strategist Charles Black said. "I think Dean can consolidate the Democratic base, and that gets him up to 46 percent. If we do a good job, the president wins by a few points, but it's not going to be huge." (1/4/2004)


MoveOn.org ad has Bush as Hitler

The liberal activist group MoveOn.org came under fire Sunday from Republicans over a television ad on its website that morphed an image of President Bush into Adolf Hitler. The 30-second spot was one of more than 1,500 entries for a contest MoveOn.org sponsored to find one that "tells the truth about George Bush's policies."

Eli Pariser, campaign director for MoveOn.org, said the ad appeared on the website with hundreds of others submitted by the public and voted on during a two-week period. They were removed Dec. 31, when the voting period had ended. According to the organization the ad didn’t make the cut

A panel of judges, including such Democratic stalwarts as actor-director Michael Moore, campaign strategists Donna Brazile and James Carville and actor Jack Black will select the winner, to be announced Jan. 12. (1/4/2004)

Missouri visit

President Bush will travel to St. Louis to promote his "No Child Left Behind" education law in the face of Democratic attacks that the two-year old act unfairly punishes weak schools and is under-funded. Bush will also hold his first campaign fundraiser of the year, adding to a record total of more than $110 million in contributions for a primary race in which he has no Republican opponent.

Bush is expected in his fiscal 2005 budget request next month to seek increases of $1 billion each for education of disabled children and for schools in low-income areas, a congressional source said. The National Education Association, representing millions of U.S. teachers, has proposed changes in the Bush legislation that would reduce the importance of test scores in judging school performance and give more help to struggling schools. (1/5/2004)

Focused

A New York Times’ story covers observations on the Bush campaign. One of the reporters sited a Bush campaign worker having a leisurely lunch. So, the reporter called to check out if the campaign was feeling confident. The basic real answer was yes, but the spin answer was focused:

Will Dr. Dean implode? "I don't have any idea about that," Mr. Mehlman said briskly, then he promised to call back with statistics showing how prepared for the battle the Bush campaign was.

Faster than you could say "Florida election recount," he did. So far, Mr. Mehlman said, the campaign has trained 5,500 county and precinct leaders in 52 regional training sessions around the country, teaching them how to register voters, write letters to the editor, be the hosts of Bush-Cheney block parties and otherwise turn out the Republican vote on Election Day. (1/5/2004)

Bush travels to land of hanging chads

The Palm Beach Post columnist writes on Thursday’s visit by President Bush:

President George W. Bush and Palm Beach County are inextricably linked in American history.

But Bush has never visited the Home of the Butterfly Ballot as president.

Bush -- who has made 17 trips to other parts of electorally crucial Florida since taking office -- is scheduled to make his first presidential appearance in Palm Beach County on Thursday when he attends a $2,000-a-head fund-raiser at the PGA National Resort in Palm Beach Gardens.

Organizers hope to raise about $750,000 for Bush's reelection campaign, says Elizabeth Fago, a major GOP fund-raiser who is one of the co-chairs of Thursday's event. Gov. Jeb Bush is also expected, Fago said. (1/5/2004)

Democratic upstaging

The Democratic leadership in Congress is working to upstage the President’s State of the Union address. It is the time when the President has center stage and Democrats are trying to make that not true.

Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California are preparing a joint speech that, it seems safe to say, will be critical of Bush administration policies. The speech will be given at the National Press Club in Washington on Jan. 16, United Press International reports.

The two Democratic leaders are also expected to give the traditional opposition-party rebuttal to Mr. Bush's Jan. 20 speech to Congress. (1/6/2004)

President fighting back

President Bush went to St. Louis where he defended his program of “No Child Left Behind.” Democrats and teachers unions have opposed the program citing that it is not fully funded and that testing is not the way to prove children are learning. Bush countered in his visit that it is the only way to make sure every child is learning and no child is left behind:

"(The) federal government's a source of money. It's now a source of inspiration. It's a source of measurement. But it's up to the local people to really make it work," President Bush said.

A congressional source said that President Bush is expected to seek an increase of $1 billion each for education of disabled children and for schools in low-income areas in his 2005 budget request next month. (1/6/2004)

In the money

The Bush-Cheney Campaign will be releasing its fundraising results in the next few days but a spokesman reports that it will be above $120 million, according to the Associated Press:

The Bush campaign this week is to release fund-raising results for the three months ending Dec. 31. A campaign official said the total since Bush began fund-raising last June would be "well more" than $120 million, which far outstrips any of Bush's potential Democratic challengers. (1/6/2004)

Match maker immigration policy

President Bush is inviting advocacy groups to the White House on Wednesday to hear details of a proposal to match willing foreign workers, mostly from Mexico, with receptive U.S. employers.

"The president has long talked about the importance of having an immigration policy that matches willing workers with willing employers," White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Monday. "It's important for America to be a welcoming society. We are a nation of immigrants, and we're better for it."

The roll out of a new immigration policy between America and Mexico comes before next week’s visit by President Bush when he meets up with Mexico's President Vicente Fox at the Summit of the Americas in Monterey, Mexico.

A White House spokesman has stated that the policies to be revealed are a set of principles and the White House would utilize bills already in Congress as the vehicles to implement the principles. Two guest-worker bills have been proposed in Congress: one from Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain and two of his Republican House colleagues, Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake; and a second from Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas.

Meanwhile, the Latino Immigration groups remain skeptical about the White House motives and are taking a wait and see attitude. (1/6/2004)

Poll Watching

In the national USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll Bush is viewed favorably by nearly 2-to-1, 65% to 35%. Howard Dean has a net negative rating, with 28% viewing him favorably, 39% unfavorably. Of the Democrats, only retired Army general Wesley Clark has a net favorable rating of more than one point. His rating was 37% favorable, 26% unfavorable.

If the election were held today, President Bush defeats Democratic front-runner Howard Dean 59% to 37% among likely voters. Against an unnamed Democrat, he wins 55% to 38%. Bush’s support is fairly strong with 45% saying they're sure to vote for him. Democratic support is softer; 27% say they will support their party's nominee.

Six in ten Americans say they approve of the job Bush is doing. That's higher than the approval ratings Clinton, Carter, Reagan or the elder Bush had at this point. Bush's approval rating on handling Iraq has risen 11 points in a month, to 61%.

Bush’s rating on the economy is up 6 points. His 54% approval rating on the economy contrasts with a 24% rating for his father one year before the 1992 election.  (1/7/2004)

Overtime pay flap

Democratic presidential hopefuls criticized the Bush administration Tuesday for suggesting how employers could avoid paying overtime to 1.3 million workers who would be newly eligible in its proposal. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the options were part of "an economic analysis that's required under the rule-making process."

"Working men and women deserve a president who will fight for them and their hard-earned dollars, and not a president who helps big corporations find loopholes to cheat their employees out of decent pay for a hard day's work," Sen. John Edwards said.

"Instead of doing whatever it takes to create jobs, it seems like George W. Bush is working overtime to make life harder for working families. The Bush assault on working people won't stop until we give the President a pink slip. This Administration simply doesn't share the values of the American people," Sen. Joe Lieberman said.

"When will the Bush administration devise a how-to plan to put people back to work?" Sen. John Kerry asked.

Employers' options to reduce costs, according to the department's report, include cutting workers' hourly wages and adding the overtime to equal the original salary, or raising salaries to the new $22,100 annual threshold so they would be ineligible.  (1/7/2004)

Immigration proposal

Here are some details of the changes in immigration policy proposed by President:

*The new "temporary worker program" would allow either one of the estimated 8 million illegal immigrants already in the United States or someone abroad to apply for the right to work legally in the country for a three-year term that could be renewed. The White House is not saying how long the term could be extended or how many times it could be renewed.

*An applicant for the program already in the United States must pay an unspecified registration fee and show they are currently employed. Applicants still in their home countries won't have to pay a fee, but must have a job lined up.

*The employer must show no Americans wanted the job.

*Temporary workers would get all the same protections afforded American workers.

*The worker must return to his or her home country at the end of the term.

*Dependents of the temporary workers would be allowed in the United States if the worker can prove they can support their family. The workers would be allowed to move freely back and forth between the United States and their home country.

*The White House also is calling for an unspecified increase in the number of green cards allowed to be granted annually.

*The plan also would provide incentives for the workers to return to their home countries, including the promise of access to retirement benefits and new tax savings accounts.

*Congress would have to write legislation for the changes to take effect  (1/7/2004)

In the money

President Bush heads into his re-election year with $99 million in the bank.  (1/7/2004)

Good times adjustments

Good times are becoming obvious with the stock market surging and economic indicators soaring, and that means bad news for the Democratic presidential hopefuls. However, they are shifting their economic messages from a broad indictment of President Bush's economic stewardship to more targeted appeals aimed at what they call ‘stretched and struggling Americans.’ The Democrats still have hope that they can craft a message of doom and gloom about the Bush Presidency, according to a Washington Post Article:

A Clark campaign aide said of his candidate's revised focus: "There's no question this is something that can work for us regardless of what might happen on the job front and economic growth. We will still talk about jobs and the economy, but we'll bring the other half in, too - middle-class distress."

The selling of bad times will continue to be difficult if the poll numbers continue in their present direction. Last February 60 percent of Americans believed the economy was bad or very bad. By last month, only 42 percent believed that, while 55 percent said the economy was good. It will grow more and more difficult to sell the Democrats’notion that the Bush tax cuts didn’t help the economy recover.

The NY Times reports that the whole tax issue is fraught with problems for the Democrats:

The debate over taxes is painful terrain for the Democratic Party, which is still haunted by the memory of the 1980's, when Republicans ran successfully against the Democrats as "taxers and spenders." Bill Clinton built his primary campaign in 1992 around the idea of the "forgotten middle class," including a middle-class tax cut and a new emphasis on fiscal responsibility. He argued that Democrats would not be returned to power until they regained the trust and loyalty of those voters.  (1/8/2004)


  • “By any measure, the charge that we are less safe under George W. Bush than we were before is simply not true,” said Bill Bennett, “Because of President Bush and no President before him, Osama bin Laden is dead, on the run, or in a hole of his own.”

  • “Instead of looking in the mirror and trying to figure out what is wrong with them, Democrats vent at Bush. It's a disastrous strategy” -- says Mort Kondracke, Executive Editor of Roll Call.

(1/9/2004)


The Republicans are coming

After a year of Democrats blasting away in Iowa and pounding the airwaves with millions of dollars of propaganda, the Republicans are dispatching troops to spin the Iowa Caucus outcome on Jan. 19. Among the Republicans who will be in Iowa that day: former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Marc Racicot, the chairman of the president’s re-election committee; Ken Mehlman, his campaign manager; Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.; U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa.; House Majority Leader Tom Delay, R-Texas; and Mary Matalin -- an adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney.

Sen. John McCain and the troops will also be in New Hampshire on the run up to the Jan. 27 primary vote as well. Beginning Saturday, Jan. 24 through Tuesday, Jan. 27 -- the day of the primary -- Bush-Cheney Campaign Chairman Marc Racicot and Ken Mehlman, Bush campaign manager, said they plan to attend varying Republican get-out-the-vote events around Manchester. Also scheduled to campaign in New Hampshire are Bush’s sister, Doro Bush Koch, New York Gov. George Pataki, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie, Mary Matalin and Bush-Cheney New England Regional Chairman Jim Tobin. (1/9/2004)


  • "Tax relief has got this economy going again, and tax relief will keep it moving forward," President Bush said.  (1/12/2004)


  There is trouble

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill proved on CBS’s show Sixty Minutes why he should no longer be Treasury Secretary. He responded in what can only be characterized as incredulity and surprise that his comments about President Bush where unflattering. Anyone that naive should not be in high office.

O’Neill’s accounts of Bush have conflicting aspects but the criticism is familiar to the criticism leveled at President Ronald Reagan, who everyone said was not engaged. A belief that was later found to be untrue. What the facts are here will take some time to find out. However, O’Neill’s response to questions for the authoring of a book, "The Price of Loyalty," will add new fodder for the Democrats who have found no lack of subjects to attack Bush on before now.

The firing of O’Neill some 13 months ago came when he would not support the second round of tax cuts. O’Neill was reportedly concerned about deficits taking funds away from fixing the Social Security problems. It was Vice President Dick Cheney who delivered the message to O’Neill that he was fired. According to O’Neil, during that meeting Cheney also chastised him:

"You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due."

O’Neill states that the Bush Administration was working from ‘day one’ to oust Saddam Hussein:

"From the very beginning, there was a conviction that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," Mr. O'Neill said in an interview with the CBS program "60 Minutes."

The White House had Commerce Secretary Don Evans out countering O’Neill on the talk shows this weekend. Evans said, "I know how he leads, I know how he manages.... He drives the meetings, tough questions, he likes dissent, he likes to see debate."

Wesley Clark jumped on O’Neill’s statements saying they prove what he has been saying all along:

"When he writes that the Bush administration is planning and exchanging documents on how to go to war with Iraq as soon as they took office, that just confirms my worst suspicions about this administration," Clark said.

There have been some fringe Democrats calling for impeachment of the President because we have not found WMD. With O’Neill, it is likely there will be a great deal more of that. Wesley Clark is calling on Congress to investigate Bush, according to the Associated Press. This could offer Democrats a much needed vehicle to get their revenge for Bill Clinton’s impeachment.

"We went to a war in Iraq - we didn't have to go to," Clark told a group of supporters. "I'm calling on the Congress of the United States to fully investigate exactly why this country went to a war it didn't have to fight."

When Chief of Staff Donald Regan wrote his book about President Reagan it was devastating to the administration. It was only after the fact that Reagan was vindicated from his former employee’s charges that he wasn’t capable of handling the complex issues facing the country.

The Democrats have a new friend in Paul O’Neill.   (1/12/2004)

Soros: gunning for Bush

Billionaire George Soros called on Americans to reject President Bush in the polls next election and he is putting his money where his mouth is. Soros made the comments during the launch of his new book, "The Bubble of American Supremacy," much of which is devoted to lambasting U.S. foreign policy under Mr. Bush. Reuters reports that the Democrats are likely to outspend Bush despite his war chest:

Bush has raised more than $130 million in campaign funds toward a goal of at least $170 million. But even with the large war chest and a big advantage in fund-raising over Democratic candidates, the Bush campaign says it could be outspent because Soros and others will spend up to $400 million on issue advertisements.

Soros said the invasion of Iraq was an example of the "Bush doctrine" which he charges entails pre-emptive military action and lack of tolerance for military rivals, suggesting two levels of national sovereignty in which the U.S. is "exempt" from constraints of international law.

"This is reminiscent of George Orwell's famous book Animal Farm in which all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others," said Soros, a Hungarian-born American.

"If we re-elect Bush in 2004 we endorse the Bush doctrine and we will have to live with the consequences," he added.  (1/13/2004)

Take backs

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill said that he regretted some of what he said about President Bush in his recently aired interview with Diane Sawyer, according to Reuters:

Asked about his comment that during Cabinet meetings Bush was like "a blind man in a room full of deaf people," O'Neill said he regretted some of the language he used to describe his former boss.

"If I could take it back, I would take it back. It has become the controversial centerpiece."

Pressed whether he would vote for Bush in the November presidential election, O'Neill said he probably would, but he said the American people needed to demand more of their leaders.

O’Neill on NBC’s Today Show said that the documents he shared were provided to him by the Treasury general counsel.  (1/13/2004)

Going to the Moon

President Bush will ask for international participation in his plan to resume missions to the moon and to send human crews to Mars within the next 20 years, a senior administration source said. The decision means foreign launch vehicles or spacecraft components likely would play an important role in the space effort. For more on the story go to The Washington Times. (1/13/2004)

Canada can bid

President Bush informed Canada that they can bid on American contracts to rebuild Iraq according to the Associated Press:

In a breakfast meeting with new Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin, Bush said he had told Martin of the shift in policy. Martin "understands the stakes" in rebuilding a free and peaceful Iraq, Bush said.

It was Bush's second fence-mending session in two days. On Monday, Bush and Mexican President Vicente Fox put aside two years of differences and said they see eye-to-eye about a new U.S. proposal to grant legal status to millions of undocumented workers in the United States, many of them Mexicans.  (1/13/2004)


  • "We will build new ships to carry man forward into the universe, to gain a new foothold on the moon and to prepare for new journeys to the worlds beyond our own," said President Bush.

  • Georgia Democratic Senator Zell Miller said yesterday that he would campaign for President Bush's re-election campaign, beginning this Thursday at a fundraiser in Atlanta.

(1/14/2004)


Supporting marriage

The NY Times reports on the administration’s debate to include a provision that would spend $1.5 billion on preserving and promoting marriage:

For months, administration officials have worked with conservative groups on the proposal, which would provide at least $1.5 billion for training to help couples develop interpersonal skills that sustain "healthy marriages."

The officials said they believed that the measure was especially timely because they were facing pressure from conservatives eager to see the federal government defend traditional marriage, after a decision by the highest court in Massachusetts. The court ruled in November that gay couples had a right to marry under the state's Constitution. (1/14/2004)

Bush Bashing Super Bowl bound

MoveOn.org is raising money to place the winner of their Bush Bashing ad contest on the Super Bowl.

The organization originally planned to play the winning ad nationally on CNN during the week of Bush's State of the Union address, but the response to the ads has been way beyond their expectations. Now, they are working to put the ad on the Super Bowl.  They call on their supporters to help place the first political ad, "Child's Pay," on the prized Super Bowl advertising slot. They urge their supporters to send Washington a clear message: no more politics as usual.

The Super Bowl ad will cost $1.6 million to place nationally. The organization needs to complete their $10 million dollar grassroots campaign, which now stands at $7.5 million.  (1/14/2004)


  • “We can go forward with confidence and resolve, or we can turn back to the dangerous illusion that terrorists are not plotting and outlaw regimes are no threat to us. We can press on with economic growth, and reforms in education and Medicare -- or we can turn back to the old policies and old divisions," President Bush said.

  • "Had we failed to act, the dictator's weapons of mass destruction programs would continue to this day," President Bush said.  (1/21/2004)


Bush center stage

For months $10 million were poured into Iowa TV media as Democrat candidates honed their attacks on President Bush. Last night President Bush took center stage and declared that the opponents to the war on terrorism are foolish and wrong headed. For full text of the speech, use this link.

The appeasers, deflectors and detractors were quick to counter that we are not safer and that Bush’s proposals are not the right ones to make us safe.

Bush was backed up from an unusual source. Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak said the president's leadership was helping to bring about a safer world. The former Prime Minister has frequently been critical of Bush. He cited the televised image of a docile Saddam Hussein submitting to medical checks after his capture, sent a powerful message to the leaders of Libya, Iran, Syria and North Korea.

“The real achievement of Osama bin Laden...is that he ignited the imagination of hundreds of millions in the Arab world. That's his ultimate weapon. That's what gives him hope and patience and a kind of evil optimism," Barak said.

Reuters reports that the World Economic Forum entertained lecturers in Switzerland who said that far from making the country safer, the war on terror and the invasion of Iraq had made us unsafe:

"Going into Iraq in the way we did, without broad international support, really increased the ability of al Qaeda and its sympathizers to 'prove' that the objective of the United States is to humiliate the Islamic world, more than it was to liberate the Iraqi people." Gareth Evans, former Australian foreign minister and head of the International Crisis Group think-tank, said al Qaeda and its sympathizers had expanded their theater of operations since the September 11 attacks to countries including Morocco, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.

The Al Qaeda already had organizations in those countries before the invasion of Iraq.  (1/21/2004)

Liberal ads rejected

Last week, CBS officially turned down ads by both MoveOn.org and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) because of their controversial nature and content. CBS executives believed the ads were not appropriate for the festive professional football game that will take place on February 1.

The ad pushed by MoveOn.org was the winning entry in the infamous "Bush in 30 Seconds" contest that recently concluded. The proposed Super Bowl ad uses children working in a factory to criticize President George W. Bush's handling of the deficit.

PETA's proposed ad has two attractive women barely wearing any clothing endearing themselves to a pizza delivery man eating meat.

When the man fails to be aroused by the women, the screen shows the words, "Meat can cause impotence."  (1/21/2004)

Continuing the attack

MoveOn.org has another ad that they say focuses on the State of the Union in 30 seconds. The ad actually focuses on prescription drug coverage for seniors:

As the ad opens, we see a series of photos from previous State of the Union addresses, cut quickly together to resemble a movie. We hear the voice of someone who sounds like George Bush. "My fellow Americans," he says, "My Medicare bill has real drug benefits…but not for you. For my contributors at the big drug companies. My bill actually forbids Medicare from negotiating lower drug prices...so you'll probably have to pay more for your prescriptions than you do now; and you won't be able to get cheaper prescriptions from Canada."   (1/21/2004)

Bush main page         Homepage

top of page

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine