George
W. Bush
excerpts
from
the Iowa Daily Report
October
1-15,
2003
…On the Wall Street Journal’s
Best of The Web, “Plame-Out?”. Excerpts: “Anti-Bush
partisans are really piling on thick over the
purported scandal involving the "outing," supposedly
by White House officials, of Valerie Plame, who may
or may not have been a covert CIA operative, and who
is married to a critic of the administration named
Joe Wilson. Josh Marshall blogged himself into
such a frenzy yesterday that he almost matched Glenn
Reynolds's output on a slow day. One random
left-wing blogger sums up the tone of the attacks:
"Conservatives have a long history in America of
resorting to traitorous acts to further their own
private agendas." We're half-expecting the
bestseller lists to feature a book called "Leaks and
the Leaking Leakers Who Leak Them." But it's not
clear if there's anything to this at all. The
whole thing got started in July, when Robert
Novak published a column mentioning that
Plame was a CIA "operative." Then, as we noted
yesterday, various left-wing journalists, apparently
egged on by Wilson, started claiming that Plame was
a covert operative--and therefore that
blowing her cover was potentially illegal--even
though neither Novak nor Wilson nor the CIA has
identified her as such. Yesterday on CNN's
"Crossfire," of which he is a co-host, Novak had
this to say: “Nobody in the Bush administration
called me to leak this. In July, I was
interviewing a senior administration official on
Ambassador Wilson's report when he told me the trip
was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on
weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official
told me the same thing. As a professional journalist
with 46 years experience in Washington, I do not
reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA
in July, they confirmed Mrs. Wilson's involvement in
a mission for her husband on a secondary basis, who
is--he is a former Clinton administration official.
They asked me not to use her name, but never
indicated it would endanger her or anybody else.
According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs.
Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert
operative, and not in charge of undercover
operatives.” That last sentence is the key:
If Novak's source is telling the truth, then there's
no crime, and the "scandal" is utterly phony.”
(10/01/2003)
…
Union Leader online article by senior
political reporter John DeStaso, “Bush expected to
visit Granite State on Oct. 9”. Excerpts:
“President George W. Bush is expected to make his
fourth visit to the Granite State as the nation’s
chief executive on Thursday, Oct. 9, with the prime
event expected to be a business luncheon at
Manchester’s Center of New Hampshire Holiday Inn.
The plans were not definite yesterday, and sources
cautioned that they could still change. But
invitations for the luncheon are expected to be sent
out as soon as tomorrow, sources said. A second Bush
stop is possible in the southern or central part of
the state, but the site had not been decided upon by
planners last night, sources said. An administration
spokesman yesterday neither confirmed nor denied The
Union Leader’s information, saying only, “We’ve made
no announcement about the President’s travel plans
beyond the end of this week.” Tentative plans
call for Bush to deliver an economic and foreign
policy address at a midday luncheon co-sponsored by
the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce and the
Business and Industry Association of New Hampshire.
Other organizations, including the New Hampshire
High Technology Council, also may be involved in
sponsorship. (10/01/2003)
…
YahooNews is carrying a report by
Associated Press writer Tom Raum, “Bush Promises to
Tackle Economy, Iraq”. Excerpts: “CHICAGO -
President Bush pledged to finish what his
administration had begun, both abroad and at home,
as he raised $6 million more for his re-election
campaign with visits to two electorally pivotal
Midwestern industrial states. Brushing aside
rising Democratic criticism about his handling of
the economy and Iraq, the president told supporters
on Tuesday, "We're laying the foundations for
greater prosperity and economic vitality and more
jobs across America." The president spoke
following disappointing reports on consumer
confidence and Midwest business activity. Bush was
traveling later to Cincinnati for another
fund-raiser, and was expected to have raised his
campaign bank account to over $82 million by day's
end. Together, Illinois and Ohio, two Rust Belt
industrial states, have lost 280,000 manufacturing
jobs since Bush took office. "So long as anybody in
America who wants to work is looking for a job, I
will work hard to make conditions for economic
growth positive," Bush told about 1,700 supporters
at a hotel luncheon. He also addressed business
leaders at the University of Chicago School of
Business. Bush pressed ahead with his re-election
fund-raising tour in the face of slumping job
approval ratings and new questions about his
administration's conduct in making its case for war
in Iraq. Before leaving Washington, Bush
instructed his staff to cooperate with a Justice
Department investigation into whether the
administration improperly disclosed the name of a
covert CIA officer whose husband had criticized
Bush's war rationale. "If there's a leak in my
administration, I want to know who it is,"
(10/01/2003)
… Washington Times
Inside Politics by Greg Pierce -- excerpts:
"The media's new word for President Bush is
'vulnerable,' " Fred Barnes writes in the
Wall Street Journal. "A Gallup Poll last week
found he trails Democrats Wesley Clark (49 percent
to 46 percent) and John Kerry (48 percent to 47
percent) in presidential race matchups. His job
approval rating dipped to 49 percent in a Wall
Street Journal/NBC News survey," Mr. Barnes said. "A
more accurate word for President Bush's political
condition is 'normal.' Mr. Bush has slumped in
his third year in office just as most recent
presidents have. A slump is the rule, not the
exception. "Still, there's far more reason than
not to expect him to recover and win re-election,
perhaps easily. His slump, assuming it's hit bottom,
has been milder than the slumps other presidents
faced and his prospects are brighter. President Bush
is lucky on the economy. His recession came early,
giving the economy time to revive before his
re-election campaign in 2004. And his foreign policy
crisis is hardly as threatening as Vietnam was for
Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. The
economy is almost certain to look better in 2004
than today and chances are Iraq will, too."
(10/02/2003)
… Washington Post’s OnPolitics article by
Mike Allen, “Bush Bests His Own Fundraising Record”.
Excerpts: “CHICAGO, Sept. 30 -- President Bush
broke his own one-day record for fundraising with a
two-stop, 12-hour visit to the Midwest, but he
could not leave the leak investigation behind. Bush,
speaking to 1,700 supporters who had paid $2,000
each for a sandwich and a 28-minute speech,
condemned "needless, partisan bickering that
dominates the Washington, D.C., landscape and the
zero-sum politics of Washington." …
"Washington is a town where there's all kinds of
allegations," Bush said. "We'll get to the bottom of
this and move on." … The fundraisers were held
at a hotel here and at a castle-like Lindner family
mansion in Cincinnati. The receptions raised a total
of $5.3 million on the final day for candidates'
third-quarter financial disclosure reports. That
edged the $5.2 million Bush raised on one day in
California in June, and brought his campaign total
to nearly $84 million, according to Bush-Cheney 2004
officials. (10/02/2003)
… Unemployment
increase in September concerns White House -- Duo
fund-raising: Bush heading to Wisconsin, Cheney
going to Iowa & Pennsylvania. “Both Bush and
Vice President Dick Cheney planned to hit the money
trail Friday to raise more campaign cash. Bush was
headed to Wisconsin, while Cheney had stops
scheduled in Iowa and Pennsylvania. The
unemployment rate, now at 6.1 percent, was expected
to nudge up to 6.2 percent for September when new
figures are made public. The economy also was
expected to have lost around 25,000 jobs last month,
which would mark the eighth consecutive month of job
losses. [Bush] was renewing his call for six
steps he says would build confidence among employers
and strengthen the economy, ranging from health care
measures, streamlined regulations and restrictions
on medical lawsuits to a comprehensive energy plan,
expanded trade and tax breaks. He has challenged
Congress to make recently enacted tax cuts
permanent rather let them expire on schedule.
Cheney’s visit to Iowa is also an attempt to shore
up Iowa for a strategic win for Bush’s reelection.
Iowa fell in the Al Gore column by only thousands of
votes. There was discussion regarding a recount
in Iowa and Wisconsin to offset possible loss in
Florida. Now, both parties see Iowa and Wisconsin
as critical to the 2004 Presidential Campaign.
In a Des Moines Register story, Thomas
Beaumont explores the difficulty of Bush
winning Iowa. "It's not a foregone conclusion Iowa
will go Republican for the presidency," said
Republican National Committee member Steve Roberts
of Des Moines. Leach said. Compounding the
issues weighing on Bush in Iowa is the drumbeat of
criticism leveled at him weekly by Democratic
presidential candidates campaigning for the lead-off
nominating caucuses. "Then the advantage the
party out of power has, particularly in Iowa, is
that all the fun in the caucuses goes to the
non-incumbent's party. And so this is a fun year for
Democrats," Leach said. "This gives a certain
momentum to the Democratic Party." Marshalltown
Republican Mary Schendel said Bush has to start
fighting back against the barrage of attacks
Democrats are delivering every week in Iowa as
they campaign for the caucuses.
(10/03/2003)
…
Good news -
sort of
--
Miami Herald
reports Bush
campaign signed chairman of Hispanics for Bush.
“TAMPA - A leading Cuban-American legislator on
Wednesday joined President Bush's reelection
campaign committee
-- but only after an emotional closed-door debate
over whether the Bush administration was committed
to sharpening its Cuba policy. Following intense
negotiations with
Bush campaign
officials
and his own peers in the state Legislature,
Rep. Gaston Cantens
agreed late Tuesday to attend Wednesday's news
conference with
Gov. Jeb Bush,
Bush-Cheney 2004 manager Ken Mehlman and other GOP
luminaries.
Cantens, a Miami Republican, stood on stage to
express his support as a chairman of ``Hispanics for
Bush.'' (10/03/2003)
… On the campaign trail in Des Moines, Iowa, Vice
President Cheney said the war on terror will be the
centerpiece issue. According to a Thomas
Beaumont article in the
Des Moines Register, Cheney also issued a
challenge to the Dem candidates to come forward with
a better plan. "It's important to remind people,
if they are tempted to listen to the other side, to
ask the questions: What's their strategy? How did
they deal with this when they were in charge?"
Cheney said of Democrats running to challenge the
Republican incumbent next year. He also cited as
justification for the war an interim report by U.S.
weapons inspector David Kay, who testified to
members of Congress on Thursday that Saddam Hussein
was working to develop weapons of mass destruction.
"One of the debates you've seen in recent days is
maybe Saddam didn't really have any" weapons of mass
destruction, Cheney said. "I think the record is
overwhelming that he had in fact had the major
investments in weapons of mass destruction."
Though Cheney's 20-minute speech focused on fighting
terrorism, he also offered hope that the sluggish
economy was improving. Cheney cited the addition of
57,000 new jobs in September as proof of an economic
recovery, although the jobless rate was unchanged
for the month at 6.1 percent. (10/04/2003)
…
Campaigning in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, President Bush
expressed his optimism on the economy. Figures
released earlier by the Department of Labor showed
the unemployment rate for September had held steady.
WashingtonPost On Politics article by AP
writer Jennifer Loven. Excerpts: “Bush spoke just a
few hours after the Labor Department reported that
the unemployment rate held steady in September at
6.1 percent of the labor force and that businesses
added some 57,000 jobs. As evidence of
progress toward a recovery, the president cited
the new report. Economists had expected the overall
civilian unemployment rate to rise to 6.2 percent,
with a loss of 25,000 more jobs. "Things are
getting better," Bush said, "But there's still work
to do," he said. That work includes lawsuit reforms
to lower health care costs, streamlined regulations,
a comprehensive energy plan, expanded trade and more
tax breaks, said Bush. He challenged Congress to
make recently enacted tax cuts permanent rather let
them expire on schedule. The president's trip to
Wisconsin was his eighth to the state, which he lost
narrowly in 2000.” (10/04/2003)
…
Des Moines Register columnist Rekha Basu calls
for an independent investigation of the White
House/CIA leak allegation. Excerpts from the
editorial: “… The latest evidence suggests
the Bush administration was so hell-bent on starting
a war with Iraq that it was willing to go to any
length - deception, fabrication, persecution of
doubters and their families. To drum up support
for the war, the White House spread bogus
information about its weapons program and suggested
nonexistent links to Sept. 11. Then, when a
scientist hired by the CIA to investigate claims
about Iraq's weapons program discredited them, some
White House officials may have launched a campaign
to punish him. They did it, the theory goes, by
"outing" his wife as a CIA operative. … the question
is whether someone in the White House leaked Valerie
Plame's identity as an undercover CIA employee to
get back at her husband, Joseph Wilson, when his
findings didn't support Bush's weapons claim.
Plame's job in intelligence involved weapons of mass
destruction. Her husband, a former diplomat in Iraq,
was hired by the CIA to travel to Niger last year to
investigate claims that Iraq was trying to buy
enriched uranium for its weapons program. He found
that never happened, and he said so in the New York
Times. Soon after, columnist Robert Novak revealed
that Wilson's wife, Plame, was a CIA operative.
Novak has acknowledged administration officials fed
him that information, but won't say who.
[EDTOR’S NOTE:
as reported in our
Oct. 1st Report… “Yesterday on CNN's "Crossfire,"
of which he is a co-host, Novak had this to say:
“Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak
this. In July, I was interviewing a
senior administration official on Ambassador
Wilson's report when he told me the trip was
inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on
weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official
told me the same thing. As a professional journalist
with 46 years experience in Washington, I do not
reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA
in July, they confirmed Mrs. Wilson's involvement in
a mission for her husband on a secondary basis, who
is--he is a former Clinton administration official.
They asked me not to use her name, but never
indicated it would endanger her or anybody else.
According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs.
Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert
operative, and not in charge of undercover
operatives.” That last sentence is the key:
If Novak's source is telling the truth, then there's
no crime, and the "scandal" is utterly phony.”]
(10/05/2003)
…
The Bush fundraising roars on, raising an
interesting comparison by Scott Reed – Republican
Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign manager.
According to an article in today’s
Boston Globe, by Brian Mooney, Reed
recalls the battle between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole
by saying, “Clinton had about a 10-to-1 cash
advantage. The media focused on it, and it drove the
debate for about six weeks, creating this impression
that it was impossible for Dole to win." With
Howard Dean as the biggest Dem wannabe fundraiser at
$15M (last quarter), and George Bush at around $50M
for the same quarter… well, you get the picture. And
folks are guesstimating Bush could receive as much
as $200M by the first part of next year. The
Boston Globe article further reports that
according to Kevin Madden, Bush-Cheney reelection
committee spokesman, the president's campaign is
hiring field directors to build a grass-roots
network and stockpiling money in anticipation of
heavy spending of "soft money" by independent
committees hostile to Bush. (10/05/2003)
…
Los Angeles Times article says there’s
doom and gloom in Republican hearts regarding Bush’s
re-election prospects. Excerpts: “…In
a sharp reversal, Republicans who just months ago
daydreamed about a 2004 election landslide now worry
that President Bush is losing control of events at
home and abroad and faces a real chance of leading
the party to defeat.
At home, anxiety about the economy is
escalating and respect for Bush is sinking. His
domestic agenda has stalled in Congress. Abroad,
troubles in Iraq and Afghanistan have eroded Bush's
traditional Republican advantage on foreign policy.
His calls for international help in Iraq have gone
unanswered. And in both countries, Americans
continue to die in guerrilla attacks.” The article
goes on to say that there’s time for things to
improve, but Bush2 needs to push hard to escape
Bush1’s re-election flop. A Capitol Hill quote shows
up from Republican Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia,
“They need to get a handle on these things…we have a
saying around here – don’t let your monkeys turn
into gorillas.” The article seems to dismiss the
report on Friday that the nation’s businesses had
added 57,000 new jobs in September (the first gain
in jobs in eight months…) and casts it as falling
into a ‘wait and see’ status regarding public
opinion.
[EDITOR’S NOTE: check out Wall Street’s reaction to
the job increase report. No ‘wait and see’ there!]
(10/05/2003)
… NBC’s Meet the Press yesterday showcased
ex-diplomat Joseph Wilson. As reported by
WashingtonPost.com, writer Walter Pincus,
Wilson stated, “I do believe, however, that the
president would never have condoned or been party to
anything like this.” (10/06/2003)
… Could a Schwarzenegger win
in California be a bad deal for Bush?
New York Times’ Adam Nagourney writes today:
“President Bush's political advisers have long
yearned to win back this most Democratic of states.
Accordingly, while wary of the unpredictable forces
unleashed by California's tumultuous recall, they
were roused by the prospect that Arnold
Schwarzenegger could topple Gov. Gray Davis,
providing at least a psychic lift to Republicans and
a demoralizing blow to Democrats going into 2004.
But now, in the final days of what has turned out to
be a very messy election, even some Republicans are
wondering if a victory by Mr. Schwarzenegger would
be such a good thing for Mr. Bush. … Some were
quick to recall that Mr. Bush, in running for
president in 2000, would frequently end speeches by
raising his right hand in the air and pledging to
"return honor and dignity to the White House" — a
not-too-subtle reference to President Bill Clinton's
sexual exploits (10/06/2003)
… President Bush toughened his stance on
his support of the investigation of a White House
leak allegedly done by a ‘senior administration
official(s).’ An article in today’s
New York Times reports Bush as saying it was
a “very serious matter” and “a criminal action”.
According to the article, the White House announced
yesterday that at least 500 of its 2,000 employees
had responded to the Justice Dept demand for
documents. Excerpts: “Mr. Bush, in his most
extensive comments about the leak to date, urged the
person who disclosed the information to come
forward. “If anybody has got any information inside
our government or outside our government who leaked,
you ought to take it to the Justice Department so we
can find the leaker,” he said. The White House has
given its employees until 5 p.m. on Tuesday to
comply with a Justice Department demand that they
turn over ‘all documents that relate in any way’ to
the disclosure of the officer’s identity.”
(10/07/2003)
… President Bush is heading to Hew Hampshire
tomorrow to speak to the Greater Manchester Chamber
of Commerce and the N.H. Business and Industry
Association. According to an article in today’s
UnionLeader.com, President Bush’s focus
will be on job creation, improving the U.S. economy
and winning the nation’s war on terror. The
article takes note of Bush’s lower job-approval
ratings and New Hampshire’s importance in the 2004
presidential race -- a narrow win for Bush in the
2000 election. Excerpt quote from Rep. Charles Bass:
“I never believed President Bush would retain a 70
or 80 percent approval rating through the election.
All these (Democratic) candidates have been tearing
him [Bush] down, and the press has been unfair in
its coverage of the situation in Iraq.” (10/08/2003)
… A Bush-Schwarzenegger meeting may be in the
works for next week. President Bush will travel
to California next week before he heads to Tokyo. It
is expected that Bush will make a couple of
$-raising stops while in California.
AP writer Scott Lindlaw reports that two
California Republicans ‘with ties to the White
House’ say Bush and Schwarzenegger are ‘likely to
make a joint public appearance in Riverside,
California, next Wednesday.’ And reported that
the Schwarzenegger campaign for governor of
California spurred an increase of some
130,000 GOP-registered voters in that state.
Article excerpts: President Bush called
Schwarzenegger yesterday to offer his
congratulations on winning the recall. White House
spokesman Scott McClellan, “The president said he
was proud of the race he ran, and he looked forward
to working with him.” … Schwarzenegger said, “He
promised me he would do everything possible to help
California, and so I’m looking forward to working
with him and asking him for a lot, a lot of
favors.” (10/09/2003)
… President Bush was in Portsmouth, New
Hampshire, yesterday – the six-month anniversary of
the victory in Baghdad. An article in today’s
WashingtonTimes.com by Bill Sammon reports on a
confident President, firing back at the Democratic
presidential candidates. Here are excerpts of what
the President had to say:
-
“The
challenges we face today cannot be met with timid
actions or bitter words."
-
"I
acted [regarding decision to wage war on Iraq]
because I was not about to leave the security of
the American people in the hands of a madman. I
was not about to stand by and wait and trust in
the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein. So in
one of the swiftest and most humane military
campaigns in history, we removed the threat."
-
“When
you become the president, you can't predict all
the challenges that will come. But you do know the
principles you bring to office. And they should
not change. They shouldn't change with time and
they shouldn't change with polls."
-
“I took
this office to make a difference, not to mark
time. I came to this office to confront problems
directly and forcefully, not to pass them on to
future presidents and future generations. These
committed killers will not be stopped by
negotiations. They won't respond to therapy or to
reason."
-
"Our
challenges will be overcome with optimism and
resolve and confidence in the ideals of our
country. Our work in Iraq has been long and hard,
and it is not finished.”
-
"Last month, the economy exceeded expectations and
added net new jobs. Just as our economy is coming
around, some are saying now is the time to raise
taxes. To be fair, they [Democrats] think anytime
is a good time to raise taxes. At least they're
consistent. But I strongly disagree.”
(10/10/2003)
…
USA Today: a news analysis by Judy Keen is
taking a look at Team Bush. Headline: “White House
moves fast to manage the debate.” Excerpts:
“President Bush's fierce defense Thursday of the war
with Iraq was part of an effort to regain control of
the debate over the wisdom of the conflict. It also
was an acknowledgment that he must act quickly to
confront some of the problems that could jeopardize
his political future. The administration offensive
continued Friday as Vice President Cheney gave a
speech on the war against terrorism in Washington to
the conservative Heritage Foundation. … "We've
got to step up our efforts to explain what's at
stake, to lay the predicate for why we're doing what
we're doing and to be clear with the American
people," a high-level Bush adviser says. Bush is
facing a slow pace of progress in Iraq, sliding
approval in opinion polls, high unemployment and a
criminal inquiry into whether administration
officials blew the cover of a CIA officer. More
immediately, he is focused on winning two vital
votes: one in Congress on his request for $87
billion for military operations and reconstruction
in Iraq and Afghanistan, and one in the United
Nations Security Council on a resolution that could
push more countries to send troops and money to
Iraq. That explains the urgency in Bush's
rhetoric, the deployment of other administration
officials to give high-profile speeches and even a
rare public fissure this week between two top aides.
… The coordinated PR offensive will continue for
several weeks. Bush's Saturday radio addresses
will focus on Iraq this month. Rice will appear
on Oprah Winfrey's TV talk show Oct. 17. Cabinet
secretaries will visit Iraq and boast about
progress. In Baghdad, there soon will be regular
briefings for reporters to highlight progress. …In
speeches at campaign fundraisers, Bush often says,
"The political season will come in its own time" and
adds that he's focused "on the people's business."
But his strong words Thursday suggest that he and
his advisers believe it's time to take on critics,
including the Democrats who want his job. Bush
aimed a question at them when he asked, "Who could
possibly think that the world would be better off
with Saddam Hussein still in power?" (10/11/2003)
… New poll, released yesterday, shows President Bush
easily outdistancing his 2004 Dem rivals.
Highlights from the
Associated Press article: “Wesley Clark and
Howard Dean fare well when matched against
Democratic rivals in national and state polls,
respectively, but they face an uphill fight against
President Bush. Bush easily outdistanced
Dean, 50 percent to 32 percent, in a poll
conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for the Cook
Political Report and released Friday. Bush bested
Clark, 48 percent to 33 percent. Dean, the
former Vermont governor, is tied for the lead among
Democrats in Iowa polls and leads in New Hampshire
surveys. Clark holds a slight lead over his
Democratic foes in national polls. Four in 10 in the
poll — 39 percent — said they would definitely vote
to re-elect Bush, while 34 percent said they would
definitely vote for someone else. Twenty-four
percent said they would consider voting for someone
else. The poll of 787 registered voters was
conducted Oct. 7-9 and had a margin of error of plus
or minus 3.5 percentage points. (10/11/2003)
… Criticism of President Bush’s handling of the
Iraq reconstruction now comes from within his own
party. High-ranking Republican Senator Richard Lugar
(Indiana), appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press”
yesterday and spoke of his concerns. The
WashingtonPost.com ‘OnPolitics’ column carried
the story, titled, “Senators Say Bush Needs to Take
Control.” Excerpts: “A key Republican lawmaker
urged President Bush yesterday to take control of
his fractious foreign policy team and plans for
Iraq's reconstruction… "The president has to be
president," Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on
NBC's "Meet the Press." "That means the president
over the vice president, and over these secretaries"
of state and defense. National security adviser
Condoleezza Rice "cannot carry that burden alone."
… Lugar noted that Vice President Cheney,
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Rice had given
speeches whose tone "was distinctly different" and
that senators were rightly concerned about "the
strength, the coherence of our policies." … He
and the ranking member of the committee, Sen. Joseph
R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), predicted narrow approval of
the $87 billion Iraq reconstruction request. … Biden,
responding to news that Bush had asked Rice to unify
the differing views on Iraq, said Bush had to "take
charge, settle this dispute. Let your secretary of
defense, state, and your vice president know, 'This
is my policy. Any one of you that divert from the
policy is off the team.' "
(10/13/2003)
… President Bush made sure the nation, and the
world, understood one thing veeeery well yesterday –
he in charge. The
Washington Times reports on Bush’s strong stance
today in an article by Bill Sammon, titled “Bush
vows he’s in charge.” Excerpts: “President
Bush yesterday asserted his authority as the chief
decision maker on postwar Iraq and lashed out at
critics for portraying his advisers as paralyzed by
political infighting. "The person who is in charge
is me," Mr. Bush said in an interview with Turner
Broadcasting. "In all due respect to politicians
here in Washington, D.C., who make comments, they're
just wrong about our strategy. We've had a strategy
from the beginning." Mr. Bush was referring to
Democrats as well as fellow Republicans like Sen.
Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee. The senator suggested
on Sunday that Mr. Bush was losing control of Iraq
policy to squabbling subordinates. Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld said last week he had not been
informed that Miss Rice was being put in charge of a
new task force to cut red tape in the reconstruction
and democratization of postwar Iraq. Democrats and
journalists pounced on the revelation as evidence of
disarray within the administration. Mr. Bush
insisted he was making the decisions about Iraq,
based largely on advice from envoy L. Paul Bremer.
"Jerry Bremer is running the strategy and we are
making very good progress about the establishment of
a free Iraq," the president said. He also gave a
speech praising Americans who "are willing to
sacrifice for the country they love." Sen. John
Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, had accused the
president Sunday of failing to protect U.S. troops
in Iraq. Mr. Bush said GIs and other Americans
"remember the lessons of September the 11th, 2001.
And so do I. It's something we should never forget."
His remarks came 24 hours after Mr. Kerry, a
presidential candidate, accused the White House of
treating the Iraq war like a political "product,"
not a matter of life and death. "It's not a
product," Mr. Kerry said on ABC's "This Week." "It's
the lives of young Americans in uniform." He said
Mr. Bush had created a "mess" in which "young
Americans are dying by the day in Iraq." … "He ought
to be apologizing to the people of this country,
because what they've done now is launch a PR
campaign instead of a real policy," Mr. Kerry said.
"They rushed the war without a plan for the peace,
and we are paying an enormous price for that now,"
he added. "This is haphazard, shotgun,
shoot-from-the-hip diplomacy, and I think it's
causing us great risk." But it was Mr. Kerry who was
accused of shooting from the hip yesterday by rival
Democrat Howard Dean, a former Vermont governor,
whose presidential campaign released numerous
conflicting quotes by Mr. Kerry on the subject of
Iraq. For example, last month Mr. Kerry said: "It
was wrong to rush to war without building a true
international coalition — and with no plan to win
the peace." The campaign for Mr. Dean said in a
statement: "Perhaps the Senator should re-read the
resolution that he voted for." It then cited the
congressional authorization for Mr. Bush to wage
war: "The president is authorized to use the Armed
Forces of the United States as he determines to be
necessary and appropriate in order to defend the
national security of the United States against the
continuing threat posed by Iraq." (10/14/2003)
… President Bush’s re-election
campaign has released last quarter’s fundraising
numbers, showing $49.5 million for the period. This
puts the Bush total at $70 million, thus far,
according to the
Des Moines Register. Today is the FEC deadline
for filing of campaign finance reports. As expected,
President Bush’s campaign will not be taking public
financing for the 2004 race. Democratic rivals
Howard Dean and John Kerry have also indicated the
possibility of opting out of public financing – a
move that could position them with more, rather than
less, ‘war chest’ money.(10/15/2003)
… Bush and Schwarzenegger to
meet tomorrow in Riverside, California to test the
waters of mutual support. In an article in
today’s
Los Angeles Times, the first meeting of
President Bush and California governor-elect Arnold
Schwarzenegger is characterized as holding great
potential for both men. Excerpts: “When
President Bush shakes hands with California
Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday in
Riverside, the event will be as scripted as if Bush
were meeting a foreign head of state. There will be
attire to coordinate: Bush is usually buttoned-down
and wearing a tie; Schwarzenegger tends to distain
neckwear. There will be the setting to arrange — one
that doesn't dwarf the president's runner-trim frame
to disadvantage against the bodybuilder
governor-elect. More important, for the last several
days, both sides have been carefully negotiating
what each can deliver politically. Schwarzenegger
has made clear that he wants Bush to help cover
California's budget deficit — the issue that looks
likely to decide the success or failure of his
governorship. For his part, Bush wants
Schwarzenegger to lead a resurgence of the
Republican Party in California — a movement that
might just allow the president to win the state's
large number of electoral votes in his reelection
bid next year. … some California officials
clearly are excited by the meeting. "It's the start
of turning the economy around in California," said
Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, the incoming state
Assembly GOP leader. "You've got to have a dialogue
start with Washington." It's a dialogue Bush also is
eager to begin. The White House believes that the
recall election has fundamentally shaken the
political status quo in California — so much so that
Bush stands a chance of carrying the state in 2004.”
(10/15/2003)
Bush
main page
Homepage
top
of page
|