Iowa 2004 presidential primary precinct caucus and caucuses news, reports and information on 2004 Democrat and Republican candidates, campaigns and issues

Iowa Presidential Watch's

The Bush Beat

Holding the Democrats accountable today, tomorrow...forever.

Official portrait of President George W. Bush.George W. Bush

excerpts from the Iowa Daily Report

October 1-15, 2003

…On the Wall Street Journal’s Best of The Web, “Plame-Out?”. Excerpts: “Anti-Bush partisans are really piling on thick over the purported scandal involving the "outing," supposedly by White House officials, of Valerie Plame, who may or may not have been a covert CIA operative, and who is married to a critic of the administration named Joe Wilson. Josh Marshall blogged himself into such a frenzy yesterday that he almost matched Glenn Reynolds's output on a slow day. One random left-wing blogger sums up the tone of the attacks: "Conservatives have a long history in America of resorting to traitorous acts to further their own private agendas." We're half-expecting the bestseller lists to feature a book called "Leaks and the Leaking Leakers Who Leak Them." But it's not clear if there's anything to this at all. The whole thing got started in July, when Robert Novak published a column mentioning that Plame was a CIA "operative." Then, as we noted yesterday, various left-wing journalists, apparently egged on by Wilson, started claiming that Plame was a covert operative--and therefore that blowing her cover was potentially illegal--even though neither Novak nor Wilson nor the CIA has identified her as such. Yesterday on CNN's "Crossfire," of which he is a co-host, Novak had this to say: “Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this. In July, I was interviewing a senior administration official on Ambassador Wilson's report when he told me the trip was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official told me the same thing. As a professional journalist with 46 years experience in Washington, I do not reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA in July, they confirmed Mrs. Wilson's involvement in a mission for her husband on a secondary basis, who is--he is a former Clinton administration official. They asked me not to use her name, but never indicated it would endanger her or anybody else. According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative, and not in charge of undercover operatives.” That last sentence is the key: If Novak's source is telling the truth, then there's no crime, and the "scandal" is utterly phony.” (10/01/2003)

Union Leader online article by senior political reporter John DeStaso, “Bush expected to visit Granite State on Oct. 9”. Excerpts: “President George W. Bush is expected to make his fourth visit to the Granite State as the nation’s chief executive on Thursday, Oct. 9, with the prime event expected to be a business luncheon at Manchester’s Center of New Hampshire Holiday Inn. The plans were not definite yesterday, and sources cautioned that they could still change. But invitations for the luncheon are expected to be sent out as soon as tomorrow, sources said. A second Bush stop is possible in the southern or central part of the state, but the site had not been decided upon by planners last night, sources said. An administration spokesman yesterday neither confirmed nor denied The Union Leader’s information, saying only, “We’ve made no announcement about the President’s travel plans beyond the end of this week.” Tentative plans call for Bush to deliver an economic and foreign policy address at a midday luncheon co-sponsored by the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce and the Business and Industry Association of New Hampshire. Other organizations, including the New Hampshire High Technology Council, also may be involved in sponsorship. (10/01/2003)

YahooNews is carrying a report by Associated Press writer Tom Raum, “Bush Promises to Tackle Economy, Iraq”. Excerpts: “CHICAGO - President Bush pledged to finish what his administration had begun, both abroad and at home, as he raised $6 million more for his re-election campaign with visits to two electorally pivotal Midwestern industrial states. Brushing aside rising Democratic criticism about his handling of the economy and Iraq, the president told supporters on Tuesday, "We're laying the foundations for greater prosperity and economic vitality and more jobs across America." The president spoke following disappointing reports on consumer confidence and Midwest business activity. Bush was traveling later to Cincinnati for another fund-raiser, and was expected to have raised his campaign bank account to over $82 million by day's end. Together, Illinois and Ohio, two Rust Belt industrial states, have lost 280,000 manufacturing jobs since Bush took office. "So long as anybody in America who wants to work is looking for a job, I will work hard to make conditions for economic growth positive," Bush told about 1,700 supporters at a hotel luncheon. He also addressed business leaders at the University of Chicago School of Business. Bush pressed ahead with his re-election fund-raising tour in the face of slumping job approval ratings and new questions about his administration's conduct in making its case for war in Iraq. Before leaving Washington, Bush instructed his staff to cooperate with a Justice Department investigation into whether the administration improperly disclosed the name of a covert CIA officer whose husband had criticized Bush's war rationale. "If there's a leak in my administration, I want to know who it is," (10/01/2003)

Washington Times Inside Politics by Greg Pierce -- excerpts: "The media's new word for President Bush is 'vulnerable,' " Fred Barnes writes in the Wall Street Journal. "A Gallup Poll last week found he trails Democrats Wesley Clark (49 percent to 46 percent) and John Kerry (48 percent to 47 percent) in presidential race matchups. His job approval rating dipped to 49 percent in a Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey," Mr. Barnes said. "A more accurate word for President Bush's political condition is 'normal.' Mr. Bush has slumped in his third year in office just as most recent presidents have. A slump is the rule, not the exception. "Still, there's far more reason than not to expect him to recover and win re-election, perhaps easily. His slump, assuming it's hit bottom, has been milder than the slumps other presidents faced and his prospects are brighter. President Bush is lucky on the economy. His recession came early, giving the economy time to revive before his re-election campaign in 2004. And his foreign policy crisis is hardly as threatening as Vietnam was for Presidents Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. The economy is almost certain to look better in 2004 than today and chances are Iraq will, too." (10/02/2003)

Washington Post’s OnPolitics article by Mike Allen, “Bush Bests His Own Fundraising Record”. Excerpts: “CHICAGO, Sept. 30 -- President Bush broke his own one-day record for fundraising with a two-stop, 12-hour visit to the Midwest, but he could not leave the leak investigation behind. Bush, speaking to 1,700 supporters who had paid $2,000 each for a sandwich and a 28-minute speech, condemned "needless, partisan bickering that dominates the Washington, D.C., landscape and the zero-sum politics of Washington." "Washington is a town where there's all kinds of allegations," Bush said. "We'll get to the bottom of this and move on." … The fundraisers were held at a hotel here and at a castle-like Lindner family mansion in Cincinnati. The receptions raised a total of $5.3 million on the final day for candidates' third-quarter financial disclosure reports. That edged the $5.2 million Bush raised on one day in California in June, and brought his campaign total to nearly $84 million, according to Bush-Cheney 2004 officials.   (10/02/2003)

Unemployment increase in September concerns White House -- Duo fund-raising: Bush heading to Wisconsin, Cheney going to Iowa & Pennsylvania. “Both Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney planned to hit the money trail Friday to raise more campaign cash. Bush was headed to Wisconsin, while Cheney had stops scheduled in Iowa and Pennsylvania. The unemployment rate, now at 6.1 percent, was expected to nudge up to 6.2 percent for September when new figures are made public. The economy also was expected to have lost around 25,000 jobs last month, which would mark the eighth consecutive month of job losses. [Bush] was renewing his call for six steps he says would build confidence among employers and strengthen the economy, ranging from health care measures, streamlined regulations and restrictions on medical lawsuits to a comprehensive energy plan, expanded trade and tax breaks. He has challenged Congress to make recently enacted tax cuts permanent rather let them expire on schedule. Cheney’s visit to Iowa is also an attempt to shore up Iowa for a strategic win for Bush’s reelection. Iowa fell in the Al Gore column by only thousands of votes. There was discussion regarding a recount in Iowa and Wisconsin to offset possible loss in Florida. Now, both parties see Iowa and Wisconsin as critical to the 2004 Presidential Campaign. In a Des Moines Register story, Thomas Beaumont explores the difficulty of Bush winning Iowa. "It's not a foregone conclusion Iowa will go Republican for the presidency," said Republican National Committee member Steve Roberts of Des Moines. Leach said. Compounding the issues weighing on Bush in Iowa is the drumbeat of criticism leveled at him weekly by Democratic presidential candidates campaigning for the lead-off nominating caucuses. "Then the advantage the party out of power has, particularly in Iowa, is that all the fun in the caucuses goes to the non-incumbent's party. And so this is a fun year for Democrats," Leach said. "This gives a certain momentum to the Democratic Party." Marshalltown Republican Mary Schendel said Bush has to start fighting back against the barrage of attacks Democrats are delivering every week in Iowa as they campaign for the caucuses. (10/03/2003)

Good news - sort of --  Miami Herald reports Bush campaign signed chairman of  Hispanics for Bush. “TAMPA - A leading Cuban-American legislator on Wednesday joined President Bush's reelection campaign committee -- but only after an emotional closed-door debate over whether the Bush administration was committed to sharpening its Cuba policy. Following intense negotiations with Bush campaign officials and his own peers in the state Legislature, Rep. Gaston Cantens agreed late Tuesday to attend Wednesday's news conference with Gov. Jeb Bush, Bush-Cheney 2004 manager Ken Mehlman and other GOP luminaries. Cantens, a Miami Republican, stood on stage to express his support as a chairman of ``Hispanics for Bush.'' (10/03/2003)

On the campaign trail in Des Moines, Iowa, Vice President Cheney said the war on terror will be the centerpiece issue. According to a Thomas Beaumont article in the Des Moines Register, Cheney also issued a challenge to the Dem candidates to come forward with a better plan. "It's important to remind people, if they are tempted to listen to the other side, to ask the questions: What's their strategy? How did they deal with this when they were in charge?" Cheney said of Democrats running to challenge the Republican incumbent next year. He also cited as justification for the war an interim report by U.S. weapons inspector David Kay, who testified to members of Congress on Thursday that Saddam Hussein was working to develop weapons of mass destruction. "One of the debates you've seen in recent days is maybe Saddam didn't really have any" weapons of mass destruction, Cheney said. "I think the record is overwhelming that he had in fact had the major investments in weapons of mass destruction." Though Cheney's 20-minute speech focused on fighting terrorism, he also offered hope that the sluggish economy was improving. Cheney cited the addition of 57,000 new jobs in September as proof of an economic recovery, although the jobless rate was unchanged for the month at 6.1 percent.  (10/04/2003)

Campaigning in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, President Bush expressed his optimism on the economy. Figures released earlier by the Department of Labor showed the unemployment rate for September had held steady. WashingtonPost On Politics article by AP writer Jennifer Loven. Excerpts: “Bush spoke just a few hours after the Labor Department reported that the unemployment rate held steady in September at 6.1 percent of the labor force and that businesses added some 57,000 jobs. As evidence of progress toward a recovery, the president cited the new report. Economists had expected the overall civilian unemployment rate to rise to 6.2 percent, with a loss of 25,000 more jobs. "Things are getting better," Bush said, "But there's still work to do," he said. That work includes lawsuit reforms to lower health care costs, streamlined regulations, a comprehensive energy plan, expanded trade and more tax breaks, said Bush. He challenged Congress to make recently enacted tax cuts permanent rather let them expire on schedule. The president's trip to Wisconsin was his eighth to the state, which he lost narrowly in 2000.” (10/04/2003)

Des Moines Register columnist Rekha Basu calls for an independent investigation of the White House/CIA leak allegation. Excerpts from the editorial: “The latest evidence suggests the Bush administration was so hell-bent on starting a war with Iraq that it was willing to go to any length - deception, fabrication, persecution of doubters and their families. To drum up support for the war, the White House spread bogus information about its weapons program and suggested nonexistent links to Sept. 11. Then, when a scientist hired by the CIA to investigate claims about Iraq's weapons program discredited them, some White House officials may have launched a campaign to punish him. They did it, the theory goes, by "outing" his wife as a CIA operative. … the question is whether someone in the White House leaked Valerie Plame's identity as an undercover CIA employee to get back at her husband, Joseph Wilson, when his findings didn't support Bush's weapons claim. Plame's job in intelligence involved weapons of mass destruction. Her husband, a former diplomat in Iraq, was hired by the CIA to travel to Niger last year to investigate claims that Iraq was trying to buy enriched uranium for its weapons program. He found that never happened, and he said so in the New York Times. Soon after, columnist Robert Novak revealed that Wilson's wife, Plame, was a CIA operative. Novak has acknowledged administration officials fed him that information, but won't say who.

[EDTOR’S NOTE: as reported in our Oct. 1st Report… “Yesterday on CNN's "Crossfire," of which he is a co-host, Novak had this to say: “Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this. In July, I was interviewing a senior administration official on Ambassador Wilson's report when he told me the trip was inspired by his wife, a CIA employee working on weapons of mass destruction. Another senior official told me the same thing. As a professional journalist with 46 years experience in Washington, I do not reveal confidential sources. When I called the CIA in July, they confirmed Mrs. Wilson's involvement in a mission for her husband on a secondary basis, who is--he is a former Clinton administration official. They asked me not to use her name, but never indicated it would endanger her or anybody else. According to a confidential source at the CIA, Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative, and not in charge of undercover operatives.” That last sentence is the key: If Novak's source is telling the truth, then there's no crime, and the "scandal" is utterly phony.”]  (10/05/2003)

The Bush fundraising roars on, raising an interesting comparison by Scott Reed – Republican Bob Dole’s 1996 presidential campaign manager. According to an article in today’s Boston Globe, by Brian Mooney, Reed recalls the battle between Bill Clinton and Bob Dole by saying, “Clinton had about a 10-to-1 cash advantage. The media focused on it, and it drove the debate for about six weeks, creating this impression that it was impossible for Dole to win." With Howard Dean as the biggest Dem wannabe fundraiser at $15M (last quarter), and George Bush at around $50M for the same quarter… well, you get the picture. And folks are guesstimating Bush could receive as much as $200M by the first part of next year. The Boston Globe article further reports that according to Kevin Madden, Bush-Cheney reelection committee spokesman, the president's campaign is hiring field directors to build a grass-roots network and stockpiling money in anticipation of heavy spending of "soft money" by independent committees hostile to Bush. (10/05/2003)

Los Angeles Times article says there’s doom and gloom in Republican hearts regarding Bush’s re-election prospects. Excerpts: “…In a sharp reversal, Republicans who just months ago daydreamed about a 2004 election landslide now worry that President Bush is losing control of events at home and abroad and faces a real chance of leading the party to defeat. At home, anxiety about the economy is escalating and respect for Bush is sinking. His domestic agenda has stalled in Congress. Abroad, troubles in Iraq and Afghanistan have eroded Bush's traditional Republican advantage on foreign policy. His calls for international help in Iraq have gone unanswered. And in both countries, Americans continue to die in guerrilla attacks.” The article goes on to say that there’s time for things to improve, but Bush2 needs to push hard to escape Bush1’s re-election flop. A Capitol Hill quote shows up from Republican Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia, “They need to get a handle on these things…we have a saying around here – don’t let your monkeys turn into gorillas.” The article seems to dismiss the report on Friday that the nation’s businesses had added 57,000 new jobs in September (the first gain in jobs in eight months…) and casts it as falling into a ‘wait and see’ status regarding public opinion.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: check out Wall Street’s reaction to the job increase report. No ‘wait and see’ there!] (10/05/2003)

NBC’s Meet the Press yesterday showcased ex-diplomat Joseph Wilson. As reported by WashingtonPost.com, writer Walter Pincus, Wilson stated, “I do believe, however, that the president would never have condoned or been party to anything like this.” (10/06/2003)

Could a Schwarzenegger win in California be a bad deal for Bush? New York Times’ Adam Nagourney writes today: “President Bush's political advisers have long yearned to win back this most Democratic of states. Accordingly, while wary of the unpredictable forces unleashed by California's tumultuous recall, they were roused by the prospect that Arnold Schwarzenegger could topple Gov. Gray Davis, providing at least a psychic lift to Republicans and a demoralizing blow to Democrats going into 2004. But now, in the final days of what has turned out to be a very messy election, even some Republicans are wondering if a victory by Mr. Schwarzenegger would be such a good thing for Mr. Bush. … Some were quick to recall that Mr. Bush, in running for president in 2000, would frequently end speeches by raising his right hand in the air and pledging to "return honor and dignity to the White House" — a not-too-subtle reference to President Bill Clinton's sexual exploits (10/06/2003)

President Bush toughened his stance on his support of the investigation of a White House leak allegedly done by a ‘senior administration official(s).’ An article in today’s New York Times reports Bush as saying it was a “very serious matter” and “a criminal action”.  According to the article, the White House announced yesterday that at least 500 of its 2,000 employees had responded to the Justice Dept demand for documents. Excerpts: “Mr. Bush, in his most extensive comments about the leak to date, urged the person who disclosed the information to come forward. “If anybody has got any information inside our government or outside our government who leaked, you ought to take it to the Justice Department so we can find the leaker,” he said. The White House has given its employees until 5 p.m. on Tuesday to comply with a Justice Department demand that they turn over ‘all documents that relate in any way’ to the disclosure of the officer’s identity.” (10/07/2003)

President Bush is heading to Hew Hampshire tomorrow to speak to the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce and the N.H. Business and Industry Association. According to an article in today’s UnionLeader.com, President Bush’s focus will be on job creation, improving the U.S. economy and winning the nation’s war on terror. The article takes note of Bush’s lower job-approval ratings and New Hampshire’s importance in the 2004 presidential race -- a narrow win for Bush in the 2000 election.  Excerpt quote from Rep. Charles Bass: “I never believed President Bush would retain a 70 or 80 percent approval rating through the election. All these (Democratic) candidates have been tearing him [Bush] down, and the press has been unfair in its coverage of the situation in Iraq.” (10/08/2003)

A Bush-Schwarzenegger meeting may be in the works for next week. President Bush will travel to California next week before he heads to Tokyo. It is expected that Bush will make a couple of $-raising stops while in California. AP writer Scott Lindlaw reports that two California Republicans ‘with ties to the White House’ say Bush and Schwarzenegger are ‘likely to make a joint public appearance in Riverside, California, next Wednesday.’ And reported that the Schwarzenegger campaign for governor of California spurred an increase of some 130,000 GOP-registered voters in that state. Article excerpts: President Bush called Schwarzenegger yesterday to offer his congratulations on winning the recall. White House spokesman Scott McClellan, “The president said he was proud of the race he ran, and he looked forward to working with him.” … Schwarzenegger said, “He promised me he would do everything possible to help California, and so I’m looking forward to working with him and asking him for a lot, a lot of favors.”  (10/09/2003)

… President Bush was in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, yesterday – the six-month anniversary of the victory in Baghdad. An article in today’s WashingtonTimes.com by Bill Sammon reports on a confident President, firing back at the Democratic presidential candidates. Here are excerpts of what the President had to say:

  • The challenges we face today cannot be met with timid actions or bitter words."
  • "I acted [regarding decision to wage war on Iraq] because I was not about to leave the security of the American people in the hands of a madman. I was not about to stand by and wait and trust in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein. So in one of the swiftest and most humane military campaigns in history, we removed the threat."
  • “When you become the president, you can't predict all the challenges that will come. But you do know the principles you bring to office. And they should not change. They shouldn't change with time and they shouldn't change with polls."
  • “I took this office to make a difference, not to mark time. I came to this office to confront problems directly and forcefully, not to pass them on to future presidents and future generations. These committed killers will not be stopped by negotiations. They won't respond to therapy or to reason."
  • "Our challenges will be overcome with optimism and resolve and confidence in the ideals of our country. Our work in Iraq has been long and hard, and it is not finished.”
  • "Last month, the economy exceeded expectations and added net new jobs. Just as our economy is coming around, some are saying now is the time to raise taxes. To be fair, they [Democrats] think anytime is a good time to raise taxes. At least they're consistent. But I strongly disagree.”

 (10/10/2003)

… USA Today: a news analysis by Judy Keen is taking a look at Team Bush. Headline: “White House moves fast to manage the debate.” Excerpts: “President Bush's fierce defense Thursday of the war with Iraq was part of an effort to regain control of the debate over the wisdom of the conflict. It also was an acknowledgment that he must act quickly to confront some of the problems that could jeopardize his political future. The administration offensive continued Friday as Vice President Cheney gave a speech on the war against terrorism in Washington to the conservative Heritage Foundation. … "We've got to step up our efforts to explain what's at stake, to lay the predicate for why we're doing what we're doing and to be clear with the American people," a high-level Bush adviser says. Bush is facing a slow pace of progress in Iraq, sliding approval in opinion polls, high unemployment and a criminal inquiry into whether administration officials blew the cover of a CIA officer. More immediately, he is focused on winning two vital votes: one in Congress on his request for $87 billion for military operations and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan, and one in the United Nations Security Council on a resolution that could push more countries to send troops and money to Iraq. That explains the urgency in Bush's rhetoric, the deployment of other administration officials to give high-profile speeches and even a rare public fissure this week between two top aides. … The coordinated PR offensive will continue for several weeks. Bush's Saturday radio addresses will focus on Iraq this month. Rice will appear on Oprah Winfrey's TV talk show Oct. 17. Cabinet secretaries will visit Iraq and boast about progress. In Baghdad, there soon will be regular briefings for reporters to highlight progress. …In speeches at campaign fundraisers, Bush often says, "The political season will come in its own time" and adds that he's focused "on the people's business." But his strong words Thursday suggest that he and his advisers believe it's time to take on critics, including the Democrats who want his job. Bush aimed a question at them when he asked, "Who could possibly think that the world would be better off with Saddam Hussein still in power?"  (10/11/2003)

… New poll, released yesterday, shows President Bush easily outdistancing his 2004 Dem rivals. Highlights from the Associated Press article: “Wesley Clark and Howard Dean fare well when matched against Democratic rivals in national and state polls, respectively, but they face an uphill fight against President Bush. Bush easily outdistanced Dean, 50 percent to 32 percent, in a poll conducted by Ipsos Public Affairs for the Cook Political Report and released Friday. Bush bested Clark, 48 percent to 33 percent. Dean, the former Vermont governor, is tied for the lead among Democrats in Iowa polls and leads in New Hampshire surveys. Clark holds a slight lead over his Democratic foes in national polls. Four in 10 in the poll — 39 percent — said they would definitely vote to re-elect Bush, while 34 percent said they would definitely vote for someone else. Twenty-four percent said they would consider voting for someone else. The poll of 787 registered voters was conducted Oct. 7-9 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.  (10/11/2003)

Criticism of President Bush’s handling of the Iraq reconstruction now comes from within his own party. High-ranking Republican Senator Richard Lugar (Indiana), appeared on NBC’s “Meet the Press” yesterday and spoke of his concerns. The WashingtonPost.com ‘OnPolitics’ column carried the story, titled, “Senators Say Bush Needs to Take Control.” Excerpts: “A key Republican lawmaker urged President Bush yesterday to take control of his fractious foreign policy team and plans for Iraq's reconstruction… "The president has to be president," Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "That means the president over the vice president, and over these secretaries" of state and defense. National security adviser Condoleezza Rice "cannot carry that burden alone." … Lugar noted that Vice President Cheney, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and Rice had given speeches whose tone "was distinctly different" and that senators were rightly concerned about "the strength, the coherence of our policies." … He and the ranking member of the committee, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), predicted narrow approval of the $87 billion Iraq reconstruction request. … Biden, responding to news that Bush had asked Rice to unify the differing views on Iraq, said Bush had to "take charge, settle this dispute. Let your secretary of defense, state, and your vice president know, 'This is my policy. Any one of you that divert from the policy is off the team.' "  (10/13/2003)

President Bush made sure the nation, and the world, understood one thing veeeery well yesterday – he in charge. The Washington Times reports on Bush’s strong stance today in an article by Bill Sammon, titled “Bush vows he’s in charge.” Excerpts: “President Bush yesterday asserted his authority as the chief decision maker on postwar Iraq and lashed out at critics for portraying his advisers as paralyzed by political infighting. "The person who is in charge is me," Mr. Bush said in an interview with Turner Broadcasting. "In all due respect to politicians here in Washington, D.C., who make comments, they're just wrong about our strategy. We've had a strategy from the beginning." Mr. Bush was referring to Democrats as well as fellow Republicans like Sen. Richard G. Lugar of Indiana, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The senator suggested on Sunday that Mr. Bush was losing control of Iraq policy to squabbling subordinates. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said last week he had not been informed that Miss Rice was being put in charge of a new task force to cut red tape in the reconstruction and democratization of postwar Iraq. Democrats and journalists pounced on the revelation as evidence of disarray within the administration. Mr. Bush insisted he was making the decisions about Iraq, based largely on advice from envoy L. Paul Bremer. "Jerry Bremer is running the strategy and we are making very good progress about the establishment of a free Iraq," the president said. He also gave a speech praising Americans who "are willing to sacrifice for the country they love." Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, had accused the president Sunday of failing to protect U.S. troops in Iraq. Mr. Bush said GIs and other Americans "remember the lessons of September the 11th, 2001. And so do I. It's something we should never forget." His remarks came 24 hours after Mr. Kerry, a presidential candidate, accused the White House of treating the Iraq war like a political "product," not a matter of life and death. "It's not a product," Mr. Kerry said on ABC's "This Week." "It's the lives of young Americans in uniform." He said Mr. Bush had created a "mess" in which "young Americans are dying by the day in Iraq." … "He ought to be apologizing to the people of this country, because what they've done now is launch a PR campaign instead of a real policy," Mr. Kerry said. "They rushed the war without a plan for the peace, and we are paying an enormous price for that now," he added. "This is haphazard, shotgun, shoot-from-the-hip diplomacy, and I think it's causing us great risk." But it was Mr. Kerry who was accused of shooting from the hip yesterday by rival Democrat Howard Dean, a former Vermont governor, whose presidential campaign released numerous conflicting quotes by Mr. Kerry on the subject of Iraq. For example, last month Mr. Kerry said: "It was wrong to rush to war without building a true international coalition — and with no plan to win the peace." The campaign for Mr. Dean said in a statement: "Perhaps the Senator should re-read the resolution that he voted for." It then cited the congressional authorization for Mr. Bush to wage war: "The president is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq." (10/14/2003)

President Bush’s re-election campaign has released last quarter’s fundraising numbers, showing $49.5 million for the period. This puts the Bush total at $70 million, thus far, according to the Des Moines Register. Today is the FEC deadline for filing of campaign finance reports. As expected, President Bush’s campaign will not be taking public financing for the 2004 race. Democratic rivals Howard Dean and John Kerry have also indicated the possibility of  opting out of public financing – a move that could position them with more, rather than less, ‘war chest’ money.(10/15/2003)

Bush and Schwarzenegger to meet tomorrow in Riverside, California to test the waters of mutual support. In an article in today’s Los Angeles Times, the first meeting of President Bush and California governor-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger is characterized as holding great potential for both men. Excerpts: “When President Bush shakes hands with California Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday in Riverside, the event will be as scripted as if Bush were meeting a foreign head of state. There will be attire to coordinate: Bush is usually buttoned-down and wearing a tie; Schwarzenegger tends to distain neckwear. There will be the setting to arrange — one that doesn't dwarf the president's runner-trim frame to disadvantage against the bodybuilder governor-elect. More important, for the last several days, both sides have been carefully negotiating what each can deliver politically. Schwarzenegger has made clear that he wants Bush to help cover California's budget deficit — the issue that looks likely to decide the success or failure of his governorship. For his part, Bush wants Schwarzenegger to lead a resurgence of the Republican Party in California — a movement that might just allow the president to win the state's large number of electoral votes in his reelection bid next year. … some California officials clearly are excited by the meeting. "It's the start of turning the economy around in California," said Kevin McCarthy of Bakersfield, the incoming state Assembly GOP leader. "You've got to have a dialogue start with Washington." It's a dialogue Bush also is eager to begin. The White House believes that the recall election has fundamentally shaken the political status quo in California — so much so that Bush stands a chance of carrying the state in 2004.”  (10/15/2003)

Bush main page         Homepage

top of page

Paid for by the Iowa Presidential Watch PAC

P.O. Box 171, Webster City, IA 50595

privacy  /  agreement  /    /  homepage / search engine