Hillary Clinton’s April fools
Sen. Hillary Clinton and Dick Durbin took to the floor
of the U.S. Senate to offer a Bush bashing of the the
President’s credibility. The Democrats still target
President Bush’s credibility as the best way to defeat
him.
Here is a copy of the transcript that Hillary mailed to
her supporters:
Many, many years ago when I was a school girl, on this
day, someone might come up to me in the hallway and say,
"Hillary, your skirt is ripped." I would turn around in
panic and they would say "April Fools." Or maybe someone
would stop me after class and say, "Hillary I heard that
Janie is really mad at you and I don't know what you did
to her but you better talk to her," and I would feel
terrible and before I could do anything about it someone
would say "April Fools." So today is April 1st, and
there is a long tradition of people playing jokes on
each other, pulling stunts, and then causing someone to
be upset, worried, anxious or maybe even happy that they
have been told something is going to happen, only to
have the rug pulled out from under them when someone
says either jokingly or sometimes a little cruelly,
"April Fools." Well, thankfully that day only came once
a year. And so you only had to endure your friends or
maybe your not so friendly classmates, jokes and stunts
for 24 hours. But you know, Mr. President, you sometimes
feel like it is "April Fools" day every single day here
on Capitol Hill, on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue
in the White House, because on issue after issue after
issue of profound importance to the American people, our
government is basically saying, "April Fools."
Do you remember when they introduced their budget in
2001, and said you know, if you drastically cut taxes on
the wealthiest of Americans, why my goodness revenues
will increase in the budget. You don't have to worry
about all the expenses that we have keeping this great
country going, because this will work. Well, three years
later we are facing a $500 billion deficit. Guess what?
April Fools on us. Remember when they said our policies
are going to generate jobs? Well, we saw during the
1990's 22 million new jobs created in America, and what
a difference that made in so many people's lives. What
have been the results of this administration's economic
policies? Well, the loss of nearly three million jobs.
So for all those Americans who believe, believe that
this administration's policies would work to create jobs
and economic opportunity, guess what? April Fools on
you.
When it comes to the Medicare prescription drug benefit
the administration knew there was an estimate by the man
responsible for calculating how much Medicare will cost
that was much higher than what had been discussed in the
debate over the bill. Here in this chamber we were told
the bill would cost $400 billion. That's a lot of money.
And it was a lot of money for what frankly our seniors
are going to get, which is going to be a lot of
confusion because so much of the money is going to drug
companies and insurance companies, but lo and behold we
wake up and find out it wasn't a $400 billion bill, it
was a $534 billion bill, and the man, the actuary, the
civil servant, he is not political, he just works year
in, year out for whoever is in office over in Medicare
was ordered not to tell the truth to the American
Congress or people about the cost of the Medicare
prescription drug benefit, or he would be fired. So we
pass this bill -- I didn't vote for it, but a majority
did -- we passed this bill. The President signs it,
guess what? April Fools. It is not going to cost $400
billion, it is going to cost $534 billion. And then of
course we’ve got No Child Left Behind—which many of us
so hoped would really make a difference in the education
of our children. But we conditioned our support on this
education reform on the promise by the president that it
would be fully funded. That the money that our teachers
and principals and superintendents and school boards,
but particularly our children would need, would be
there. Well, no longer is that promise even credible.
The president signed the bill and then presented a
budget didn't provide the money that is required to
fully implement No Child Left Behind. Once again, April
Fools on us.
You know, Americans have been fooled time and time again
by this administration. Fooled by promises and fooled by
predictions. Indeed, for three and a half years, this
administration has said one thing and done something
else. And the list is far longer than what I have even
mentioned. You know this was an administration which
said we are going to do something about global climate
change and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, that is
warming our climate and we just got a report from the
Pentagon talking about what that means to our national
security. The president gave speeches when he was
running for office saying we are going to deal with
that. Lo and behold he gets into office, forget it.
April Fools, climate change, no such thing as -- thing
as going forward under this president. We have just seen
some recent examples with respect to the gas prices that
are going up. That's a big concern. It is a concern in
my State; it is a concern around our country. You know
we are seeing OPEC cutting production, which will cause
even higher prices for gasoline, and you know when the
president was running for office, he said "Why doesn't
anyone do anything to get these gas prices down?" "When
I'm legislated," he said, "I will make sure OPEC doesn't
raise gas prices on us." Well, OPEC went and did it.
They cut the production. And all the President said was
how disappointed he was. It doesn't sound like much of a
strong case being made on behalf of the American people.
But again, what should we expect? It is the same story
from this administration. Say one thing, do something
differently. Fool the people, not just one day a year,
but every single day. You know, it is as if words don't
matter anymore with the administration or regrettably
with the Republican leadership in congress. There are a
lot of serious issues facing the people I represent. We
are losing jobs. A lot of people are losing their health
care benefits. The cost of education to send a child to
college is going up. We have a lot of challenges that I
think we should be working together to meet. You know on
this side of the aisle why have we done that? Because it
hasn't been raised for about eight years or so, and
there are a lot of really decent hard-working people who
are falling further and further behind because you know
their costs are going up but there incomes sure aren't.
We also want to do something about overtime, because
what this administration has done is to say we want to
change the rules which would take away overtime
compensation from about eight million Americans. Can you
imagine what a horrible experience that would be for
somebody working a shift as a police officer or
firefighter or nurse to be told, well, your government;
your president doesn't want you to be paid for the hours
you have to work extra. April Fools on you. You are
going to work but not get paid for it. So we don't like
that. Now, is that obstructionist that we Democrats
think it is not fair people should have to work and not
be paid for it? I don't think so. I think that's in the
tradition of American fair play. But we can't get a vote
on it here because you know. Why? The Republicans know
that if they had to have a vote on it would actually
pass. And that would really embarrass the president and
his administration. So they don't want us to vote on it.
Unemployment benefits, the same thing. You know a lot of
people are not only out of work but they can't find work
because there are so few jobs being created in this
economy. The administration doesn't want to help these
people. They don't want to give them that extra
unemployment benefit that can tide them over until maybe
we can see some jobs created that will put people back
to work, so our friends on the other side of the aisle
don't want to vote on that, because the administration
would be embarrassed. Because they know that if
Republicans had to vote on it they would actually vote
for it. So they don't really want that to happen. Time
and time again, we have seen the president and the
majority say one thing and do something else, and you
know, it is April Fools Day today, but that's no way to
run a government. It is no way to run a great country.
Mr. Durbin: Will the Senator yield for a question?
Mrs. Clinton: Yes.
Mr. Durbin: I would like to ask, isn't there an
important issue here that affects families and
businesses across the United States with the increase in
gasoline prices? And if I recall correctly, Governor
Bush, when he was a candidate for president, said in
Manchester, New Hampshire that he thought in that
circumstance that the president should use the power of
his office to force the OPEC nations to try to expand
their exports of oil so that gasoline prices did not go
up in America. And isn't it true at this point in time
that this administration not only has failed to do what
the president promised as a candidate he would do, but
in fact OPEC has announced that it is going to reduce
their exports to the United States, and even force
greater increases in gasoline prices which will hurt the
American economy and American families?
Mrs. Clinton: The Senator from Illinois is absolutely
right. Not only did the president when he was running
for office say he would jaw bone and really fight back
hard against OPEC if they tried to limit supply or raise
prices, but he even said he would use his connections in
the oil industry to make sure that got done. We all know
about his connections and the vice president's
connections. There has never been an administration in
our history that is so closely connected to big oil and
big gas and big coal and everything else. So what
happens? OPEC meets, whatever they try to do behind the
scenes sure didn't work because they voted to cut
production by 4%. And when that was announced, what did
the president do? He said he was disappointed. There was
also never a president or anyone in an administration
who is closer or whose family is closer to many of the
big oil producing countries like Saudi Arabia. They have
connections and relationships and friendships going back
decades. So one would think that if any president could
nurse OPEC not to make take damaging position against
the American consumer, it would be this president. But I
see no sign action of that. I see no effort of that, and
once again it is say one thing, do something else. April
Fools on the American people.
Mr. Durbin: I also feel in the state of Illinois as I
travel around and speak to families and businesses there
is one consuming issue and that is the cost of the cost
of health care. Cost of insurance. Businesses see
dramatic increases in health insurance premium. With the
table prospect of reducing or eliminating coverage for
their employees and that is unfortunately led to more
and more uninsured Americans. Is it not true that given
the chance on the floor with the prescription drug bill,
where the Bush Administration could have stepped forward
and spoken for these families and businesses and said to
the pharmaceutical companies, you have to, as Canada
done, restrain price increases so that drugs are
affordable. Is it not also true that on this issue which
relates directly to the competitiveness of American
products, the welfare of American families and the
future of businesses and jobs, that this administration
has once again caved into the special interest groups,
the drug companies in this case, and HMO's at the
expense of the American economy?
Mrs. Clinton: Once again -- once again the Senator from
Illinois is absolutely correct. As you well remember, on
the floor concerning the prescription drug benefit had
many opportunities to try to rein in the cost of
prescription drugs. To try to give permission to
Medicare to negligent, as any big institutional buyer
would have the right to do. And also to import the drugs
that are American made, American approved back from
Canada so that they could get the lower prices. But
again this administration and the republican majority
steadfastly stood against the American public, stood
against our seniors, and stood for the pharmaceutical
industry. And as a result, the cost is going to be so
much greater and so much of that increased cost is not
going to go help our seniors and to lower drug costs so
that we can perhaps have even more prescription drugs
available for our people. But it will go right into the
pockets of the pharmaceutical companies and the
insurance companies.
Mr. Durbin: Is it not also the case this administration
took tax payer dollars to buy advertising on television
for their prescription drug program, and frankly
misrepresenting what the program meant in terms of
savings for seniors? So bad enough that the bill itself
did not keep the cost of prescription drugs under
control, the administration took taxpayers dollars and
used them to basically put a message out that at least
wasn't complete and perhaps was distorted are,
misleading many seniors into believing this prescription
drug bill is going to be of some benefit?
Mrs. Clinton: The senator from Illinois raised another
important issue, because the administration is using
taxpayer dollars to convey a misleading impression of
the Medicare prescription drug benefit, and to do so as
a way of boosting the president's reelection
opportunity. So taxpayer dollars instead of his campaign
dollars are being used to try to persuade the American
people against the evidence that this massive bill, with
so many benefits for the pharmaceutical industry and the
insurance companies, is good for them. And it is
regrettable as the senator knows, because many of us
tried to prevent that from happening. To say let do this
right. Let's do this in a bipartisan, unified manner
where we really do provide a prescription drug benefit
for our seniors.
But you know as the senator also is aware in the last
several weeks, the president's campaign has been
accusing one of our colleagues, the Democratic nominee
for president, of flip-flopping. Of saying one thing one
day and saying something else at a later dates. It is
the pot calling the can he tell black at the very least
because it is this administration which on every
important issue to the American people has either
changed position or has persisted in providing a
misleading and inaccurate argument on behalf of a
position that they have taken. And the distinguished
career and public and military service of the senator
from Massachusetts, Senator Kerry, is one that needs no
defense from me or anyone else. It stands on its own
merits. But it is regrettable that an administration
increasingly known for its two-sided approach to its
talking out of both sides of the mouth at the same time,
of saying one thing and doing something else, would be
accusing anyone of engaging in that kind of behavior. So
Mr. President, it is April Fools Day once a year.
Thankfully that's only once a year in most of our lives,
but here in Washington, it is every single day. It is
365 days a year. The administration has engaged in April
fool tricks on the people of this country repeatedly.
But I think people are waking up. They are starting to
say wait a minute. You know, where is that you know big
surplus that you promised if we did everything you said?
How come my taxes are going up as a middle-income
American while the taxes on the richest are going down?
How come this is the first president in our nation's
history that has led us to war and cut taxes at the same
time? How come the White House didn't tell us the truth
about the cost of the Medicare prescription drug? How
come the administration didn't fund No Child Left Behind
the way it had promised? How come we are having a
transportation bill that the president has threatened to
veto when it is the only jobs bill on the horizon that
can put people to work be repair the infrastructure and
modernize our transportation system in a way that will
make us richer and stronger in the future? Well, the
April Fools Day jokes are coming to an end.
You know, fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,
shame on me. And the American people are starting to ask
the hard questions. They are not just questions coming
from Democrats but from Independents and Republicans,
coming from long time government employees who don't
have any partisan affiliation like Richard Clarke,
asking hard questions that deserve honest answers,
because at the end of the day, Mr. President, what
really matters is that the American people have trust in
their government and believe their president when he
talks to them about matters of life and death. Because
that's what we are talking about. Life and death. And
so, let's hope that when this day ends, maybe we can
have some good news from this administration in the form
of some admissions and some corrections that will put us
back on the path of unit. That will create the tone the
president promised. That would be a positive tone here
in Washington where we could deal with the real problems
facing Americans. I am not optimistic but I am hopeful
that we could see that happen, because these are matters
of profound importance. And it is imperative that we, as
a nation, have faith in our leaders in these dangerous
and difficult times. Thank you. I yield the floor.
(4/2/2004)
New York beware
Does NY want an abuser?
There is talk about Bill Clinton (the lover not a
fighter, or at least in the oval office) becoming Mayor
of New York City.
However, New York might want to checkout Dick Morrison’s
article about how then Arkansas Governor Clinton
attacked Morris. He offers the article to correct lies
in Hillary Clinton’s book, Living History.
The real reason I was reluctant was that Bill Clinton
had tried to beat me up in May of 1990 as he, you,
Gloria Cabe, and I were together in the Arkansas
governor's mansion. At the time, Bill was worried that
he was falling behind his democratic primary opponent
and verbally assaulted me for not giving his campaign
the time he felt it deserved. Offended by his harsh
tone, I turned and stalked out of the room.
Bill ran after me, tackled me, threw me to the floor of
the kitchen in the mansion and cocked his fist back to
punch me. You grabbed his arm and, yelling at him to
stop and get control of himself, pulled him off me. Then
you walked me around the grounds of the mansion in the
minutes after, with your arm around me, saying, "He only
does that to people he loves."
I continued to work for Bill since I felt a
responsibility to do so until Election Day in 1990. But
our relationship was never close and never the same.
After the 1990 campaign we parted ways as a direct
result of the altercation. (3/10/2004)
Give me the money
Bill Clinton is still the key fundraiser for Democrat
National Committee still. He recently was used in a
fundraising letter from the DNC asking for money to
attack Bush. Here are some of the letter’s appeals for
funds:
"Our Republican opponents know that they can't possibly
succeed if they run on their record," Clinton argued.
"They'd be trying to defend the indefensible."
The former president specifically identified the
oft-quoted "tax cuts for the wealthy" as evidence of an
"indefensible" record. He also described the economy
under Bush as "the worst economic record since Herbert
Hoover."
On the environment, Clinton says Bush's policies "would
give polluters more freedom to dirty our air and timber
companies more opportunity to ravage the last road-less
areas in our national forests."
He also noted "senseless attacks on civil liberties,
needless provocation on civil rights, and dangerous
tactics in foreign policy."
Describing America as moving "in the wrong direction,"
Clinton says Republicans will choose to "go on the
attack" against the Democratic nominee rather than
debate him on ideas.
"It's our job to help our presidential candidate and
other Democrats caught up in tight races fight their way
through to victory," Clinton explained. "We've got to be
with them every step of the way, unfailing in our
loyalty, unyielding in our determination."
(3/3/2004)
Hillary main/archive page
P.O. Box 171,
Webster City, IA 50595